Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2010 June 29

< 2010 June 28

2010 June 29

2010 June 30 >

Back to main feedback page

Index of all pages

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PubWatch

Hello, This is my first article. I would appreciate feedback from anyone that has the time. Thank you.

~~Steved1973 (talk) 00:12, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please try and add categories to the article. This enables the article to be listed with similar articles, increasing the amount of viewers to the article. You can start your search for appropriate categories , if you would like to do so. Chevy monte carlo 05:34, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:AriZonaRosa/John_Dougherty_%28Journalist%29

Ready to go live?

~~AriZonaRosa (talk) 00:14, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent article. I fixed the category links for you and added a link to another article, and I think it's ready to go live. Shall I move it for you, and if so where? Please send me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Chevy monte carlo 05:36, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First Presbyterian Church (Hartford City, Indiana)

New article. What do you think?

~~TwoScars (talk) 02:10, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good work. I think it just requires a little bit of tweaking - such as adding additional references to the opening paragraph and other paragraphs, as there are only a few. Chevy monte carlo 05:39, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Guam_Memorial_Hospital

Please review.

~~202.151.76.28 (talk) 03:18, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please try and add additional links if you can, and maybe some more pictures. Chevy monte carlo 05:47, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Raj6644/Tamil_Nadu_Newsprint_and_Papers_Limited_(TNPL) - Feedback

Dear Wikipedians,
This is my First Wikipedia Article.
It's my long time desire to write a Quality & standard Article for Wikipedia.

Is the Article Ready enough to go live?
Is the Article is organized Properly?
Is the Article's citation is enough to justify the contents

I have spend nearly 4 days in learning before posting my article. please have a review my article & provide your 'valuable feedback'. ~~Raj6644 (talk) 11:20, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You need to change the section names into lower-case (upper-case section titles are not really encouraged on Wikipedia). Also please try and give some more descriptive names to references 1, 2 and 3. Also I think the article is too long (condensing parts into one paragraph would be a good idea) and you need some additional reliable references. Chevy monte carlo 15:01, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cascade_Park,_New_Castle,_Pennsylvania

I just moved this from user to mainspace, figuring it was good to go as a start while I continue to research/expand it with more source info and references (three references so far). Any feedback/suggestions would be most appreciated. :) Thanks, and all the best!

~~Pianotech (talk) 11:52, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article. Please consider adding a picture and categories, if you can. Chevy monte carlo - alt 12:12, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback! :) Are the categories not visible, or did you mean add more of them? Pictures will be coming. I couldn't find any public domain images of the park that I could use, so I am going to snap a few of my own and then just release them to pd after I upload them. Those will be coming soon. Thanks again for the review and helpful suggestions! Pianotech (talk) 12:17, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The categories are not visible - I will fix that for you. Uploading your own photos is a great idea! Good luck :) Chevy monte carlo 14:49, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you seem to have corrected the categories yourself, never mind :) Chevy monte carlo 14:54, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doug_Biro

I've created a short article for a producer/director with reliable sources (newspapers, magazines, links to other notable people he's connected professionally). I would love some feedback on it. I would also like to know why at the top of it, it says "This is not a wikipedia article...". How do I get this published properly so that it does not have this note at the top? Thanks in advance for your help, Annunziata

~~webmistress 12:13, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

You might want to separate the article into sections, and maybe add an infobox. I recommend maybe Template:Infobox director or something like that. Chevy monte carlo 14:55, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel_Isenberg

I added reliable sources and I believe that the article is validly important. Please contribute any feedback. Thanks.

~~Elmopuck (talk) 17:11, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:James_Murday/James

Please review this article and let me know this can be accepted for Wikipedia. Thanks James

~~James Murday 17:41, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joel_Lion

Please check if this Article is suitable for Wikipedia. Thanks.

~~68.161.240.31 (talk) 18:21, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preston_Bailey_%28Event_Designer%29. I want to know why this is still considered a draft and not yet published?

Why is this page still considered a draft, and not yet officially published?

~~Preston.bailey.intern (talk) 19:43, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Rosenlund

Information

I am currently starting to write about semi professional and professional soccer players. I have begun starting with a local talent Matt Rosenlund who has played all throughout the ranks in the native of my country and has a very promising future.

This article will bring him more exposure and see him get more opportunities then ever before. Currently playing in the Premier Development League of North America. He is playing at one of the highest levels in North America and should be shown exposure for that.

~~Mraju01 (talk) 20:45, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]