User talk:Katharineamy/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Katharineamy. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 7

Just wanted to say thanks for adding so many links to articles I'd created from the DNB. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 09:18, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Likewise for the Harold Barnwell article. Shipsview (talk) 21:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

I notice you do a lot of red links. I understand the purpose is to encourage an article one day. But isn't too many red links - how to put it, indecorous? Slightsmile (talk) 01:52, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi it's me again. Doesn't Ephraim Stern still need a ton of wikifying work? The Layout is a disaster. Wikifying isn't just adding links, but lots of things. Slightsmile (talk) 00:00, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Wikify's February 2011 Wikification Backlog Elimination Drive. We'll be trying to reduce the backlog to 18,000 articles and clear the 2008 backlog, and we need your help! Top participants in the drive will receive barnstars for their contributions! If you have a spare moment, please join and wikify an article or tell your friends. Thanks! Note: The drive starts February 1, but you can sign up today!

Guoguo12--Talk--  20:59, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Category:Jerusalem albums, which you created, has been nominated for renaming to Category:Jerusalem (Swedish band) albums. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:23, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you everyone who participated in the January Collaboration, it was quite a success with 5 new C class articles, 3 stub kills and several articles were removed from our backlogs. In support of the Great Backlog Drive, the WikiProject Novels Collaboration for February is going to help remove backlog candidates in the backlogs related to WikiProject Novels. Please join us, and help us wikify, reference, clean up plot sections and generally improve Novels content, Sadads (talk) 21:50, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

You are recieving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Novels according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Members

I have a request. Could you not add red links to the song titles in a track listing for an album, such as you did in Hawaii (album). Per WP:NSONGS, "most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article" so it is quite unlikely that articles will ever be created for them, making red links completely unnecessary in these cases. Also, some of the links point to other non-related articles due to an ambiguous title, which is not helpful to the article. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 04:43, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I noticed all the red links you put into Roberta Gellis with this edit [1]. Please can you not create so many red links (as others have requested above). Also, those book links that aren't red are wrong links (i.e. links to DAB pages, or wrong articles). I have reverted your edit and merged the good links in the header. Widefox (talk) 08:36, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Roberta Gellis, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. and other articles (e.g. Maximum allowable operating pressure), where a link was created without checking that it is a redirect to itself. Please slow down adding links, as it is generating a lot of extra effort to fix wrong links, remove excessive red links etc, as mentioned above. Widefox (talk) 09:44, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

I notice that you made several more links to Capa vehicle after I (accidently) included the {{deadend}} parameter to {{multiple issues}}. The article clearly had many links already, including many redlinks. You should therefore have queried the {{deadend}} (eg by checking the article's talk page, edit history, or with the user who added it), rather than just adding more.

A check at the article's talk page (Talk:Capa vehicle) in this case might have shown it was possibly added by accident with all the others.

The only link I've unlinked is the circular link to Capabus, which redirects back to the same article (see WP:OVERLINK). Tim PF (talk) 00:07, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

With all the power invested in me (which is none, sadly), I now pronounce you the Internal Link Queen!

I just wanted to say that, in my opinion, your name is synonymous with quickly and accurately adding internal links to pages. There are very few Wikipedia wide tasks that are synonymous with a username but you and internal links have cemented that association in my mind. I've never been into Barnstars but if there was one to give you, I'd give it. Keep up the good work! OlYeller^Talktome 22:39, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

The article Kieu Tri Nguyen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find reliable, secondary sources to verify the existence of this artist.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. joe decker^{talk to me} 14:49, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kieu Tri Nguyen is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kieu Tri Nguyen until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. joe decker^{talk to me} 15:33, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Hey Just wanted to thank you for adding some links to the Broken Mammoth site page. Nerwen Aldarion (talk) 04:31, 9 April 2011 (UTC)Nerwen Aldarion

I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on List of parks in Pittsburgh, as the given deletion rationale was A3, but there was indeed content on that page. Apparently it was a redirect to Category:Parks in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and at some point a bot edit broke the redirect. I have reinstated the redirect. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 13:59, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

I just wanted to thank you for adding links to the Induced Pluripotent Cells Cure Disease article. It's a group project for my college bioengineering class and none of us are really familiar with editing wiki. So this is just a huge thank you from me and my teammates! Mahill104 (talk) 13:37, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Why didn't any of the others that had done tidying up on The Beast spot that it was a load of old shoe repairers? Makes a nice change to delete something for you that isn't a dry bit of housekeeping. (If I see your name, I know I don't have to worry over much about deleting something.) As hoaxes go, that obviously wasn't bad - it had been up since February. Equally obviously, it wasn't good enough to fool thee and me..... I've just been inspired by your userpage to add a new Non-Boxy Thing to mine. (That's things there aren't userboxes for yet.) Keep up the good work. Peridon (talk) 20:28, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for working on Glossary of card games. Unfortunately I made a mistake with that: I meant to create this in user space and take my time completing it before moving it to main space, as I usually do. Now that I have become aware of the mistake I moved it to my user space at User:Hans Adler/Glossary of card games and proposed the resulting redirect for deletion. I hope that's OK with you. Hans Adler 22:40, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

The page Frat Life Productions looks like it may be a valid CSD, but I prefer not to delete a page unless the creator has been notified. I understand that sometimes automated tools fail to do the notification for some reason. Not sure if that was the case, but could you make the notification?SPhilbrickT 20:23, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi, since you've withdrawn your candidacy, I've closed you RfA. If I may say so, your withdrawal seemed very speedy and it would be wise not to consider four comments to be a complete cross-section of community opinion. Not having bumped into you until now, I honestly don't know how you would have fared had it stayed open longer. If you decide, down the line somewhere, that you would be more useful to the project with a few extra buttons, then it might be worth looking at some recent successful RfAs to get a feel for what's expected of a candidate during an RfA. I may be overstepping my bounds here, but I would also suggest that, if you choose to have another editor nominate you, it's usually best (with no disrespect to your nominator) to pick somebody who is well known and experienced at RfA. Anyway, I do hope your brief RfA hasn't left a bitter taste in your mouth—RfA can be tough, but many of the project's best editors are not administrators, so you shouldn't see it as a reflection on you as an editor. If you need anything, my (metaphorical) door is always open. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:16, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Indeed as one of the oppose commenters, I was surprised to see you withdraw so soon. I feel that with some project space experience under your belt that you'll make a good admin in the future, if you want to. Hang around one or two of the XfD pages and give your opinions. RfD can always use more eyes, AfD and the administrators' noticeboards are good places to see wide range of wikilife. Also, I note you're in London - you'd be more than welcome to come along to the meetup in Holborn this afternoon if you're interested. They're primarily social events but they are good ways to meet other Wikipedians. Thryduulf (talk) 09:18, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

(from my talk) Sorry that link should be m:Meetup/London/45, a typo my part. I understand about saving money! Thryduulf (talk) 11:18, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

I was surprised to see that I missed an RfA from you! While it's a shame you withdrew so soon, I understand your reasons why, and I'm sure that you'll make a good admin someday if you choose to run again: you can count on my support. Best. Acalamari 10:08, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

mauchoeagle _(c) 23:49, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

mauchoeagle _(c) 21:24, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In one of your recent edits, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:10, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Bard गीता 23:32, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

		The Wikilink Barnstar
		In recognition of your work in adding links to thousand of articles. This barnstar is long overdue. Keep up the good work! mauchoeagle (c) 00:38, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

at Furio Piccirilli. It was a throw-together piece and needs all the assistance that it can get. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 21:03, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

I have requested an account on the ACC account creation interface. Katharineamy (talk) 22:04, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Katharineamy thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request so welcome to the team. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide thoroughly to familiarize yourself with the process.

You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on IRC where a bot informs us when new account requests come in and to get any advice on requests as well as the mailing list. Please note that we have implemented a policy of zero tolerance on mishandled requests, and that failure to assess correctly will result in suspension. I would like to emphasize that it is not a race to complete a request, and each one should be handled diligently and thoroughly.

Currently you are allowed to create up to six accounts per day, although you won't be able to create an account with a similar name to that of another user; these requests are marked "Account Creator Needed" by the bot and "Flagged user needed" in the tool. However, if you reach the limit frequently, you can request the account creator permission at WP:PERM.

Please keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse will result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for participating in the account creation process. Again welcome!

Mlpearc powwow 18:51, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Category:Novels by Angelo Tumino, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Skomorokh 18:33, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

The article Australian Defence Force Basic Flying Training School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

After 20 months this article is little more than two sentences. No attempt has been made to demonstrate notability or to identify the source of the content.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dolphin (t) 07:46, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello! You amended some categorisation on an article I've written up (thanks by the way!) - it's still sitting as a new, unreviewed article... Would you be able to have a glance over it as an independent person and remove the tag for me? It's been sitting for a while now and nobody's done anything yet! Thanks.... Amor Group is the one in question! stephenmcleod (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 13:10, 13 June 2011 (UTC).

Nice work! I was wondering today how Category:Uncategorized_pages is so small, now I realise it's your good work. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 22:32, 16 June 2011 (UTC)

Do you only do {{uncategorized}} or also {{catimprove}}? Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 19:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi, yes, the situation is I'm checking newly created articles for unreferenced BLP's(bio of living person), to help the searching it's using some automatic tools that use the categories, either the lack of them, living person, year of birth, year of death. When I find a uncategories bio and the person is dead, i.e Lau Bun,Angelo Messedaglia,Syed Mohsin Nawab Rizvi I've added a year of death so it no longer can be considered a BLP. The downside is that by adding one category I can then only mark it {{catimprove}}, which in turn may mean that it doesn't get categoried correctly for some time. Regards, SunCreator ^(talk) 19:26, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for adding those categories to the Antiguo Autómata Mexicano article. That article needs a lot of love, and as the creator I hope it doesn't get deleted; I'll be very sad if it does. I'm just curious, how did you find out about it? Bravo! Alfa! Papa! 20:20, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip; I'll try to do that. Lighthead ^þ 20:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Good news: I found a reference from (get this!), URB magazine. I couldn't believe it! He's more popular than I thought. Thanks for the tip. Bravo! Alfa! Papa! 21:22, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

This text is enquired to ask you a question. This questions consist in one (01) question, titled "question number one", represented by the following symbols:

"1" and ")" together and side by side, as a result: "1)" followed by a setence.

So now, Please answer question number one.

1) Where are you from?

Thank you very much. You can go choose your guerdon now. Go on.

Oneness01 (talk) 15:58, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

naveenpf (talk) 03:57, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for adding four categories to this article. But I've got a problem with the previous automatic edit of citations by another editor which I would like to undo but can't because of your subsequent edit. So I am going to undo your four categories in the hope of reinstating them after cutting the automatic edits? Hope you can understand this :) All the best --Rskp (talk) 03:42, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for the categories added to the article "Marvin Berry and The Starlighters". George Rodney Maruri Game (talk) 18:01, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Saw you included my submitted page in a roundup of companies based in Mass, etc. Might you review the page so I can get on with my life? ;) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Events_inc Thank you! Carmdru (talk) 02:49, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

thank you for editing 'Claire Holley'... rapbishop

Rapbishop (talk) 06:34, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Category:Lee Perry albums, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:22, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Dear Katharineamy:

I just visited my Wikipedia page (David Scott Milton), which has been in existence for I don't know how long, a couple of years I suspect. (Just checked. It's four years) I found that the page has been essentially deleted. It now says this: "This article is an autobiography, or has been extensively edited by the subject or an institution related to the subject, and may not conform to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy." In looking at the history of what was left of the article I found your edit of the article. I'm not sure if you designated the article as autobiography or not-- I am essentially illiterate in these computer matters. Perhaps you can help me.

The article is certainly not an autobiography. I have no idea how one even enters a Wikipedia article or writes a Wikipedia article. It says that the article has been extensively edited by the subject or an institution related to the subject and may not conform to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Again, I have never edited anything concerning me & have no idea how one even does that. As far as an "institution related to the subject"... again, I am not a member of any institution that would have a reason for writing about me. I've always assumed that I was in Wikipedia because of my accomplishments as a writer and actor, six novels, play on Broadway, awards, etc. It's embarassing to think that people are looking me up on Wikipedia and being told that I have written my own entry! Who on earth came to this conclusion? How can I demonstrate that this is not so? I don't want to appear paranoid but it seems as though someone with an axe to grind with me has purposely set about to embarrass me.

I hope I'm not jumping to loopy conclusions, but this is all very unsettling. Can you tell me how I can resolve this? Again, I am virtually illiterate when it comes to technology and computers. Please explain to me in the clearest, simplest language what I must do and how this came about. Were you the editor who designated my article as "autobiography" or was it someone else? Who should I contact? What should I do?

Sincerely, David Scott Milton — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.105.58.150 (talk) 10:42, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Dear Katharineamy: I posted the following entry and neglected to type in a headline & it ended up following someone else's post. Sorry.

Dear Katharineamy: I just visited my Wikipedia page (David Scott Milton), which has been in existence for I don't know how long, a couple of years I suspect. (Just checked. It's four years) I found that the page has been essentially deleted. It now says this: "This article is an autobiography, or has been extensively edited by the subject or an institution related to the subject, and may not conform to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy." In looking at the history of what was left of the article I found your edit of the article. I'm not sure if you designated the article as autobiography or not-- I am essentially illiterate in these computer matters. Perhaps you can help me. The article is certainly not an autobiography. I have no idea how one even enters a Wikipedia article or writes a Wikipedia article. It says that the article has been extensively edited by the subject or an institution related to the subject and may not conform to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy. Again, I have never edited anything concerning me & have no idea how one even does that. As far as an "institution related to the subject"... again, I am not a member of any institution that would have a reason for writing about me. I've always assumed that I was in Wikipedia because of my accomplishments as a writer and actor, six novels, play on Broadway, awards, etc. It's embarassing to think that people are looking me up on Wikipedia and being told that I have written my own entry! Who on earth came to this conclusion? How can I demonstrate that this is not so? I don't want to appear paranoid but it seems as though someone with an axe to grind with me has purposely set about to embarrass me. I hope I'm not jumping to loopy conclusions, but this is all very unsettling. Can you tell me how I can resolve this? Again, I am virtually illiterate when it comes to technology and computers. Please explain to me in the clearest, simplest language what I must do and how this came about. Were you the editor who designated my article as "autobiography" or was it someone else? Who should I contact? What should I do? Sincerely, David Scott Milton DSM! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.105.58.150 (talk) 10:50, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

thank you so much for helping the page I started by adding categories 1888 births and 1961 deaths I think you also helped in entering the category for people from Kotel (my grandfather's birthplace) and Bulgarian economists so thank you thank you, I am a newbie and am learning and although printed out all the instructions from wikipedia still have trouble in uploading files onto the page; linking; categories, formatting; and have much editing to do still, thanks! you are a wonderful star in the ether...snejanac 00:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dobrevasnejana (talk • contribs)

Thank you very much for your contribution :-) Sgarod (talk) 21:32, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Would appreciate your review of Events inc page -- innovative events mgt company in MA. Yourscoutpr (talk) 16:03, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

I suggest we divide the letters up so we're not falling all over each other trying to edit the same articles. Why don't you pick a couple of letters? --THE FOUNDERS INTENT ^PRAISE 21:16, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Actually it did happen, but I'm knocking off for a while so no worries. --THE FOUNDERS INTENT ^PRAISE 21:29, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi, This is a random survey regarding the first sentence on the Wikipedia policy page Verifiability.

"The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth—whether readers can check that material in Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true."

In your own words, what does this mean? Thank you. Regards, Bob K31416 (talk) 01:11, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Davison Associates is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davison Associates until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Edcolins (talk) 19:21, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello, i made an article containing a video game character. It's already in a plausible manner but it said i need a third party, i see that you once edited the page for John Mactavish and this page is very similar to what i just made, named Captain Price (Call Of Duty). I need help please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Godzilladude123 (talk • contribs) 12:26, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi Katharineamy! I just wanted to let you know, when you need to categorize a disambiguation page, you should do so by adding the {{disambig}} template to the page, instead of the category directly. The template adds the category for you. Thanks! --JaGa^talk 03:26, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

All that's being done to the disambig pages right now is because an article on various 9/11 memorials already exists. | ^help_dןǝɥ | 17:59, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Please contact me at resourcesecon@yahoo.com for further discussion on article Robot economics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 1.23.182.117 (talk) 17:21, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for adding the categories onto DC Tenz's article. MetaCow (talk) 04:23, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ADFM. As a contributor to the article, you might have interest in it. Sincerely, SamBlob (talk) 16:10, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks Katharine, Your work and edits are truly appreciated. Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nil pat13 (talk • contribs) 21:11, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Also thanks from me for the Norman & Beard cat. I knew it should have one, but had no idea what Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:53, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

It's interesting, but rather sad, to see that you and 3 other editors (as well as a bot) edited this stub without realising it should have been redirected to the long-established article at Government College of Technology, Coimbatore! 85.211.13.188 (talk) 13:47, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for redirecting the pages about football in Cocos Islands — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.71.8.154 (talk) 19:19, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

		100000 Edits
		Congratulations on reaching 100000 edits. You have achieved a milestone that very few editors have been able to accomplish. The Wikipedia Community thanks you for your continuing efforts. Keep up the good work!

Buster Seven Talk 14:06, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi there. I've just cleaned up George Butterworth (psychologist), which was an article contributed by a new user using the Article Creation Wizard. However, the text submitted was copied from the source provided, which is a problem (I've just deleted the revisions that are copyright violations, and left the original editor a note). I'm also leaving notes with those who edited the article since its creation, as I want to try and work out what went wrong here. I've been told there was a big backlog at new pages patrol in September and October (may still be one for all I know), so maybe that was it. You did work on categorising and wikilinking the article, but the article text itself was obviously a copyright violation (it was written in the first person). Also, you marked the article as a living person with birth year missing, but it was not too difficult to find his obituary and birth and death year, which I've now added. Others should have spotted this as well, but could I ask that you look more closely at new articles that you work on to make sure this sort of thing gets caught earlier in future? Thanks. Carcharoth (talk) 20:45, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

for the band Star FK Radium, an image file was successfully uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, here is the url http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Star_FK_Radium.jpg

and here is the image

could you upload this image to Star FK Radium's Wikipedia page, thanks, Drynevada — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drynevada (talk • contribs) 19:10, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

Low-level equilibrium trap (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Consumption, Endemic, Vicious circle, Arable

Genecia Luo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Enneagram, Fitness

Lingala village, Vatsavayi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Multiplex, TDP

Claudia Luke (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Coastal prairie

Elliot London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Branding

Load pull (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Superposition

Lower Sepik Languages-Ramu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Mongol language

Lowestoft Chronicle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to World domination

Lucknow Mahotsav (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Tehzeeb

Tom Lovatt-Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

was linked to Painter

Any suggestions for improving this automated tool are welcome. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:14, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I'm the creator of DPL bot, which just left the message above. I want to apologize for it and offer a solution. The message is intended as a service to people writing articles, not people doing maintenance work like yourself. I don't want you to think you're expected to fix dablinks on top of your wikilinking work.

The solution is to put a template anywhere on your talk page that tells DPL bot not to leave messages for you. Here's the syntax:

{{bots|deny=DPL bot}}

Another thing you might be interested in is Anomie's Link classifier, which gives you a tab you can use to color-code wikilinks by type (redirect, up for deletion, disambig, etc.)

Thanks, --JaGa^talk 15:25, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for having that user label - I was already doing it myself and didn't realize that there was anyone else doing it! It's now on my user page... Allens (talk) 21:34, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

thanks for touching/editing the page I posted. I could not help but notice a few postings about the article, including "it reads like a student essay" and "does not cite references". Well, I suppose that is because I am aware of no references. These facts I learned after attending electronics school and working in the field for many years. There are no references that I am aware of (NEW information?). "reads like an essay", well, it IS an essay! Perhaps you know of an EE professor who would like to chime in?.. maybe not.. I am aware of at least several EE professors who have desigend and built (even sent into production designs of) equipment who were apparently unaware of these things. thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.78.199.134 (talk) 05:14, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

hello

bhushanrm.mech (talk) 14:56, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	For your great work in adding links to Wikipedia articles. How hard to read would articles be if they weren't there? The Evil IP address (talk) 12:40, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Council on Foundations (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Networking, Diversity, Foundation, Compensation, Conference, Endowment, Donor, Voluntarism and Benefactor

Aldo Zelnick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Clandestine, Audacious, Bully and Duplicity

Belgitude (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Dutch, French, German and Marginality

Cuisine of East Timor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Jelly, Lime and Mint

Aldo Capitini (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Conference and Conflict

Dvir Abramovich (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Diatribe and Melbourne Film Festival

The Leslie Cantwell Collection (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links to Space travel and Transcendence

Boeing 797 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Widget

CIGREF (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Intangible

Calgary Islamic School (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Islamic education

Canezou (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Belt

Chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Fatigue

Conjunctival concretion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Abrasion

Consensus conferences (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Conference

Creole Giselle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Creole

Cultural probe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link to Artifact

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Robert Hart Baker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Conductor, Poulenc and Dvorak

B Sides (Security Conference) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Conference

Benjamin Graham formula (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Growth rate

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

An important historical figure and authority on Malcolm X, Abdullah H. Abdur-Razzaq's Wikipedia Page is long overdue. As a novice to Wiki, my brief biographical account of Mr. Abdur-Razzaq's life - as it relates to Malcolm X - was accepted by Wikipedia with the help of technical assistance by more experienced contributors such as yourself. Might I ask what brought you to the page and inspired you to contribute? T.Diva 19:29, 31 December 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taina.diva (talk • contribs)

at Sir Richard E. Beatmont - how did that last 2 months?! SmartSE (talk) 00:08, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

I'd be happy if you'd contribute more to the Lego Ninjago: The Series article. Your original help was great, thanks. I posted some suggestions on the discussion page as well.

If you want you can watch more episodes of the series on youtube. I believe a user named XmasToys has several uploaded.

Mike44456 (talk) 04:22, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	for work on categorisation! Zymurgy (talk) 20:54, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Hey thanks for categorising the Godsized article! It's only the second Wikipedia article I've created, in about a decade of using Wikipedia. I'm going to make it awesome over the next few months. I would give you a barnstar if I knew what the hell they were, or if they were valuable or something. 213.105.1.168 (talk) 01:07, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	I just wanted to praise you for your work on Prabudh nagar district. I have been trying to work on the article, but you, you just upgraded the article! WeirdnSmart0309 (talk) 21:36, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank You for editing, now can you please review this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajayupai95 (talk • contribs) 12:12, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Rodeo Cove, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Rupert Clayton (talk) 00:47, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Your Edit of Mitsuo Aoki article:

Hi Katharine. Thank you for your edit/improvement of the article I drafted on Mitsuo Aoki. He is a well-known theologian, and we are looking to improve it. Just today we received a request for information from someone who's doing another article on him, and when that's finished we'll link it too.

You might enjoy a project I'm doing other than on Wikipedia. It's at www.montereybaybotanicalgarden.com. If you want to email me, there's a Contact Us page, and send your email c/o Oldnoah, and it will get to me. I haven't been to London since 1968, which I believe was a few years (like maybe 17!) before your time, but I'm sure the City hasn't lost its charm.

Warmest regards,

Oldnoah (talk) 02:10, 9 February 2012 (UTC)Oldnoah

		The Categorisation Barnstar
		Our editing paths cross frequently, and I'm always impressed with your speed, efficency, and accuracy when it comes to categorisation. Your work in this area goes over and above the call of duty, where many others simply add the minimal obvious and remove the tag as they drive by. You're well deserving of some praise, and this barnstar from me is long overdue. Keep up the good work! :)  -- WikHead (talk) 01:55, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Nice Job! Thank you. P10kaka (talk) 19:56, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Just wanted to drop by and say thanks for helping me on that page. It still is not finished, but I appreciate the help! LegacyOfValor (talk) 07:40, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Just wanted to thank you for your contributions to Edward DeMarco. Ottawahitech (talk) 18:55, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

Thanks for categorising {{Incat catamarans}}. However, in this edit you removed the noinclude tags, which meant that every page that the template was transcluded on was added to Category:Wikipedia templates. Obviously it's onyl the template itself which belongs in that category, so the cat should be placed within noinclude tags. I've gone and done that now, along with adding some more precise categorisation (which I suppose I should have done at the time). Anyway, just a heads-up for the future. Cheers. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:51, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Who do I go to about getting that page set up? I noticed that all the pages up to 1999 are set up. Is 1998 going to be set up? I just think that it should have been set up since all other years have been set up. And I know that you have done work on some of these pages, so I was wondering if you were interested in helping. Arjoccolenty (talk) 23:10, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your help in categorizing the page i started "May I Hebb your Attention Piss" ;). Ayanosh (talk) 21:25, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for categorizing my newly created article" May I Hebb Your Attention Pliss".:) Ayanosh (talk) 23:18, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BikerOrNot.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BikerOrNot.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dennis Bratland (talk) 04:20, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi Katherineamy, you categorized my item on lithium battery packs for oceanographers as lithium ion batteries. However, they are primary lithium batteries. Lithium ion batteries are rechargeable and primary lithium batteries are not. For oceanographers, the advantage is that primary lithium cells store about 3x the energy. I'm now to Wikipedia and I haven't figured out categorization yet. Rlgordon3 (talk) 22:37, 22 March 2012 (UTC) Lee Gordon 22 March

CristinaStroe72 (talk) 04:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Golden Wiki Award Thanks for your recent contributions! 66.87.2.193 (talk) 16:36, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Did you write the article on Katherine Force Spencer?

I am her grand-daughter and wanted to point out some dramatic inaccuracies.

You are mixing-up Katherine and her mother-in-law! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.74.49.197 (talk) 19:02, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello, I've come across a couple of articles that you added links to but didn't remove the {{wikify}} tag. Feel free to remove the tag after you wikify an article. Ryan Vesey Review me! 00:52, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi, how are you? I saw that you watched this article. I want to say you that this article would be redirected to Ocotea foetens I am from Spain and I sure you that this tree is an old name for Ocotea foetens. This species not exist. You can check it in Canary islands or Azores Islands or even in Madeira island. Besides, I want your help for edit whatever tropical tree species. I ask you to enlarge articles related with tropical botany or tropical genus or families of trees. My first language is spanish, so I have a bad english. Please, please help us with tropical species little knows.Curritocurrito (talk) 19:11, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

This article was lifted almost verbatim from this site. Katharineamy 21:13, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

This species is Ocotea foetens this article is duplicate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.120.185.55 (talk) 14:05, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

• The previous statement cites no sources, and as far as I can tell there is no reputable source that makes this synonymy. The Plant List has it as a synonym of Agathophyllum persoonianum Blume, but the circumscription of that species is still not entirely resolved, so any changes would be premature. I am therefore reverting the redirect to Ocotea foetens. Ocotea (talk) 00:38, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Could you please delete the article "Mary Mediatrix of all graces"? since those proposed dogmas have now been integrated into the apparition, recently seen by Pope Benedict XVI during the 2011 Ad Limina Visit and presented in Wednesday General Audience. Though still pending at the Holy See, it is approved by the Archdiocese of Manila? That way it is cleaner. Thanks for your help. :) HeartyBowl1989 (talk) 18:11, 5 June 2012 (UTC)HeartyBowl1989