Rabid

David Cronenberg is incapable of making a bad film, he only makes average and very above average films and Rabid is unfortunately an average one for me, regardless of the fact that it copies Shivers. While there is no danger of boredom, the film doesn't offer much action or gore. 60% (04/24/2014)

Psychology has been present in Cronenberg's work since the beginning; his films are not just simple, soulless horrors but powerful pieces distinguished by their absolutely outstanding special effects. Any human mutations in Cronenberg's films look truly realistic, which only amplifies their bizarreness and the revulsion that the viewer feels. Interestingly, despite what his films might suggest, Cronenberg never studied psychology at university; surprisingly, he holds a degree in literature. It doesn’t change the fact that his films are truly powerful, and you’ll take away impressions from each of them that can’t always be considered positive. Not because they are bad films, but because they force us to reflect on our darker sides. Rabid is no exception. (11/22/2013)

I didn’t like Rabid very much. Even though it has a pretty gloomy atmosphere full of uncertainty, the film didn’t leave any deeper impression. The story is a clear copy of Shivers, but that infection worked better in the enclosed space of a residential complex than in the streets of Montreal. What I liked the most was the first part set in a clinic, but afterwards I almost got bored at times. That said, the internal transformation from human to monster was good. 7/10 (03/17/2008)