Réalisation:
Osgood PerkinsScénario:
Osgood PerkinsPhotographie:
Andrés ArochiMusique:
Elvis PerkinsActeurs·trices:
Maika Monroe, Nicolas Cage, Blair Underwood, Alicia Witt, Michelle Choi-Lee, Dakota Daulby, Lauren Acala, Kiernan Shipka, Jason William Day (plus)VOD (1)
Résumés(1)
L'agent du FBI Lee Harker, une nouvelle recrue talentueuse, est affectée sur le cas irrésolu d'un tueur en série insaisissable. L’enquête, aux frontières de l’occulte, se complexifie encore lorsqu’elle se découvre un lien personnel avec le tueur impitoyable qu’elle doit arrêter avant qu'il ne prenne les vies d’autres familles innocentes. (Metropolitan FilmExport)
(plus)Vidéo (4)
Critiques (13)
Osgood Perkins maîtrise totalement le style, ce dont on se rend compte dès les premières minutes, et il maîtrise certainement aussi le contenu, car ce film d'horreur criminel teinté de satanisme fonctionne très bien, tient en haleine, surprend et est déjà considéré comme l'un des événements du genre cette année. Je ne m'attendais vraiment pas à être scotché à ce point ! Encore une fois, Cage et sa performance sont légendaires. Par ailleurs, c'est assez amusant que Perkins parvienne à utiliser dans un film de ce type des éléments qu'on attribuerait normalement plutôt à James Wan (poupée démoniaque, personnage aux yeux lumineux sous un voile noir, maisons aux nombreux recoins sombres, chanson pop qui se répète), mais contrairement à Wan, il les utilise de manière tout à fait mesurée, non superficielle et intelligente (raison pour laquelle son prochain film sera produit par James Wan lui-même). Une excellente surprise donc, film d'horreur de qualité et décidément une œuvre qui vaut le déplacement au cinéma. ()
Un thriller psychologique atmosphérique et glauque avec une composition intéressante de Nicolas Cage et une Maika Monroe toujours aussi rêveuse, mais un scénario médiocre. Ce dernier combine le polar et le film d’horreur satanique et tente de surprendre et de choquer avec certains détails, mais il n’y parvient pas, et avec un travail insuffisamment imaginatif sur les clichés du genre, Longlegs ne reste donc attrayant que sur le plan audiovisuel. Un peu comme le film Black Phone, qui avait fait l’objet d’un battage médiatique similaire. ()
While the international acclaim and impressive trailers promised the event of the year and a film with a cult status in the style of Se7en and The Silence of the Lambs, the result is different and it shows in the final rating, which isn't around 80%. I for one have to say that I haven't enjoyed a crime film like Longlegs in a long time. There's more or less everything I love about the genre, the horror label is only there because of the satanic overtones and the supernatural, otherwise it's a proper crime thriller, with an increasingly better Maika Monroe on the hunt for a serial killer who is murdering families. Nicolas Cage doesn't appear until halfway through the film, but his devilishly creepy performance deserves praise. The atmosphere is suffocating and unpleasant, the audio-visuals are perfect (the sounds were very creepy), the acting is top notch, there were some nasty shots, though we don't get to see outright gore. I'm also happy with the ending, it gives the crime genre a completely fresh and original touch. I almost didn't breathe for most of the film despite the slower pace (I also praise the well written dialogues!). Good film. 8/10. ()
There's no denying Longlegs' awesome atmosphere and very impressive individuality, but I actually have more problems with the final film than I feared. Overall, it's kind of off-kilter, so it doesn't have the flow of a traditional horror-thriller film, but it's also literal, more or less predictable, and without any major surprises, so it doesn't even move within the confines of full-on psycho oddity. I found the whole investigative line of inquiry unsatisfying and futile, with Osgood Perkins basically faking a detective procedural with the birth dates and murders, the cryptic letters; it all sounds and looks cool, but what really came out of it and what was the point? I strongly missed those moments here, where the investigator figures something out and the film is able to explain how those findings move closer to the killer. Here, in contrast, the shifts in the investigation just "happen", or the titular Longlegs sends the protagonist a clue... Nicolas Cage is excellent, excellent, until suddenly he stops being excellent (about the time he starts "singing"), then his performance becomes rather distracting. I'm very hesitant to rate it between 3 and 4 stars, I've already clicked a couple of times. I guess the second screening, which won't be burdened by expectations (which were high now), will have to crack it definitively. ()
An atmospheric delight. The pacing is murderously slow, but it’s perfect for the bleak story; the vast majority of the film takes place at night, or in the darkness of houses, or - as in, say, The Silence of the Lambs - in the brisk autumn weather with overcast skies. Osgood Perkins works with the picture format in interesting ways and varies it, and it's all complemented wonderfully by the ominous music and shiver-inducing sound design. Admittedly, for the less knowledgeable, it would be a mistake to go into this as a "Nicolas Cage movie", he's only here for about five minutes in total, but his creation is still memorable and wrung to the marrow. Towards the end it was a little too contrived for me, but you can forgive such nits in a film when you're having such a great time. The fact that the main character is a woman then adds an extra layer of tension because you do worry about her. Perkins is a talent, his dad starred in one of the greatest thrillers of all time, and he makes great thrillers, so the cycle has come full circle. I'll continue to watch him, he’s one smart kid. ()
Annonces