Operatőr:
Stirling BancroftZeneszerző:
Tim WynnSzereplők:
Emile Hirsch, Bruce Dern, Lexy Kolker, Grace Park, Amanda Crew, Kwesi Ameyaw, Matty Finochio, Michelle Harrison, Aleks Paunovic, Aria Birch (több)Tartalmak(1)
A 7 éves Chloe-t apja bezárva tartja. A lányba félelmet plántált a külvilággal kapcsolatosan, s a lány úgy hiszi, a rendellenességek állandó veszélyt jelentenek rá. Amikor egy titokzatos idegen segítségével Chloe-nek lehetősége lesz megtudni, mi is zajlik börtöne falain kívül, rájön, hogy bár az igazság nem egyszerű, a veszély nagyon is valóságos. (Filmcafe)
(több)Videók (3)
Recenziók (10)
A hollywoodi blockbuster-motívumok legeredetibb feldolgozása egy kis indie-filmben, amely egyszerre tart tőlük távolságot és néz le rájuk a maga szellemességével. Az év meglepetése. Úgy kitalálva, hogy először kérdéseket tegyen fel és művészi módon csaljon a testével, majd meglepjen egy eredeti filmes világ feltárásával, ezután érzelmileg bevonja a nézőt és a lehető legigazságosabb módon - egyetlen jelenet kizárólagos hatása nélkül - játsszon vele, hogy újszerű ötletek vízesésével bombasztikus élményt közvetítsen. Kicsi Lexy Kolker kiváló teljesítményt nyújtott. Ne nézz trailereket, ne olvass szinopszisokat! [Sitges FF] ()
At least once a year, there is a film that no one expects much from, but in the end it is a pleasant surprise and Freaks delivers a lot of value for money. A beautifully crafted mystery film that is strange, unsettling, and secretive from the start, but also suspenseful and entertaining. The film raises some interesting questions and gradually answers them with unexpected and imaginative twists as it progresses. The performance by the young Lexy Kolker is perhaps the best by a child actor since Jacob Tremblay in Room, and the finale is unexpectedly quite action-packed and bloody. If the film had, say, a $20 million higher bigger budget, we'd all be sitting in the cinema right now applauding, but maybe we'll see that in a possible sequel! The less you know, the better for you. Best mystery flick of the year. 8.5/10. ()
Freaks slightly fools the viewer – in the first half, it lets them wonder what exactly is happening in the film, overwhelming them with a bunch of confusing motifs and weird characters (basically every single character feels disturbing and puzzling). In the second half, however, the film introduces a surprising outcome that gives the previous plot meaning and plays nicely with the viewer’s emotions. Bruce Dern as a cynical crude-ish ice-cream man is incredibly cool and his interaction with Emil Hirsch fills the film with witty lines and lots of fun, especially towards the end. And I believe we will be hearing a lot more about little Lexy Kolker. [Sitges 2018] ()
Throughout the first half the film is set in a world whose laws are kept under wraps from the audience with surprising perseverance at least until halfway through, thus making it minimalist by simply having the father and daughter hiding from the surroundings in a boarded-up house, and it creates an atmosphere of uncertainty, which is perhaps justified, but also perhaps only amounts to paranoid fear of an unknown enemy. In the second half, the truth comes out in full, while a number of hitherto vague, unclear, and illusory motifs are finally supplemented by meaning and context, the characters are assigned specific goals and finally, more action-packed trick scenes take place, which do serve the story and they are never used just for effect. Elements we know from American feature films with budgets in the hundreds of millions are used imaginatively and originally for the benefit of a remarkably told and cleverly constructed story, which deserves several sequels or a TV series, and is dominated by the great acting of the talented nine-year-old Lexy Kolker. ()
Just in case anyone is reading this comment as the first, I’d like to repeat the advice of previous commenters: if you don’t know anything about this film, avoid finding anything about it and, for God’s sake, do not watch the trailer. At least the entire first half greatly capitalises from throwing the viewer into the whirlpool of a weird story where they can’t figure anything out – who, what, why, how? At the beginning, the only thing we know is that a little girl called Chloe lives together with her strangely behaving father (?) in a kind of dilapidated building, and that she’s forbidden to go outside. And this dark paranoia, which is soon complicated by a series of other mysterious motifs, is only very slowly given some order. What is not slow at all, though, is the pace at which the plot moves forward. There’s always something happening; twists alternate twists, ideas alternate ideas. Although in the end the main motif turns out to be ordinary and trite, the way it’s presented, from its point of view and with such balls, is something that we’ve probably never seen before. There are times when you can see that a million or two more in the budget wouldn’t have hurt, but overall it’s a lot of fun. ()
Hirdetés