User talk:Szczepan1990

...

Archive 1 || Archive 2 || Archive 3 || Archive 4 || Archive 5

Odwołując się do twojej wypowiedzi na mojej stronie dyskusji przytoczę przysłowie: ,,Panienka uparta, trzech groszy niewarta. Damianwiszowaty12 22:33, 12 Wrz 2010 (UTC)

Man... the picture that you deleted from BRILAT is not license you say... but it is my Spanish army unit emblem.It is mine, I have it on my arm, on my uniform and for my service and all those years serving I have the right under Spaniards laws to use such emblem... This is the first time in my life than I hear it is necessary a license for using a military emblem like example into a unit article. Well, then all Spaniards news papers are violating the Spanish Army licenses rights... Great... What about if I take a Picture of my arm... My arm is mine so can I publish that picture or I need a permit from God??? So He is suppose to have all human body rights... Maybe you are not a believer (so I'm not)... on that case I can ask for permission to my DNA...

Ah!!! one question... Need I a license permit too for using my Country Flag picture???

Thanks bro. 4/15/08

Why are you removing my comments from another user's page, and with popups all the more? You have no right. Patstuart 19:01, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

then why the hell you say things like that to person who just uploaded photo from en.wiki where it stand as free-license photo? calm down --Szczepan talk  19:06, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because it was clearly a copyvio, as it's been marked no the page. People should not just blindly upload from another Wikipedia. Patstuart 19:07, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have been unblocked, but I am going to quit for today. I apologize for getting angry and reporting you to the pump. Patstuart 19:32, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Witaj. Usuń proszę obrazki: Image:McEnroe_John.jpg, Image:Ivanisevic_Goran.jpg i Image:Costa_Albert.jpg. Oryginały na flickru mają nieodpowiednią licencję (nie dojrzałem... mea culpa). Pozdrawiam, pjahr ۞ 07:10, 20 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chodzi mi o plik Raslogo.jpg potrzebuje go do zilustrowania artykulu o RAS na wiki, ale faktycznie nie jestem tworca obrazu. Co zrobic by teb plik zalegalizowac? zalatwic oswiadczenie tworcow ze nie maja nic przeciwko temu? Przerysowac ? Z gory dziekuje --Vtg 21:01, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jasne. Postaram się jutro bo dzisiaj nie będę miał czasu. Pozdrawiam Poznaniak 12:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dziękuję. Takich odpowiedzialnych ludzi oby więcej. Nie wiem co wg Ciebie ma moja praca na commons do tego co zrobiłem i za co odebrano mi uprawnienia na plWiki. Widać masz mierne pojęcie o mojej działalności a głos Twego pokroju jest postrzegany przez niektórych zadufanych w sobie użytkowników commons za dobry omen.

Dla wytłumaczenia Twego odpowiedzialnego głosu wstawiam Tobie zgodę otrzymaną od WKU na wykorzystywanie ich materiałów. Ale nie wiem, czy będziesz na tyle chętny aby przejrzeć do jakich wstawionych zdjęć kilku mądrali się z tego projektu czepia: File:Zgoda Komendanta WKU Gdynia - Wikipedia.jpeg oraz File:BiuroHydrograficzneMarynarkiWojennej - zgoda.JPG. Tak się składa, ze tego typu zgody, trzeba wychodzić i być upierdliwym do bólu. Działania GeorgeHH, Siebranda, którzy nawet nie pofatygowali się aby wysłać maila w języku angielskim do ww. instytucji (są na stronach internetowych) a zarzucają mi łamanie praw autorskich są nikczemne. Nikczemny był również Twój głos, bo nawet nie spojrzałeś o co chodzi. Doprawdy przestaje mnie dziwić opinia o Polakach na świecie... Joymaster 18:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jesteś zwykłą .... Ot, co! Cieszysz się? Jesteś dla mnie nikim po tym jak pokazałeś jakie wartości dla Ciebie są ważniejsze! A teraz słowo od serca: jednostki Twego pokroju powinny podlegać eksterminacji, niestety, nikomu tego nie powiedziałem, ale ktoś musi być pierwszy. Joymaster 20:08, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Widać, że jesteś totalnym ignorantem. Nawet nie pokwapiłeś się by sprawdzić lub zapytać o licencję - najprościej zniszczyć i usunąć. Powodzenia w działaniach destrukcyjnych.

P.S. Zdjęcia były mojego autorstwa - ale nie chce mi się ich ponownie zamieszczać bo nie mam czasu stimoroll 07:37, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

"Jesli nie umiesz przeczytac czegos, co masz na dyskusji przez 3 tygodnie to pretensje mozesz miec tylko do siebie --Szczepan talk  15:51, 22 November 2007 (UTC)"

Podkreślasz swoją ignorancję. Myślisz, że jak ty siedzisz całymi dniami na Wiki to każdy tak robi ? Zaglądam na commons raz na miesiąc na 2 miesiące może nawet raz na pół roku. Każdy poświęca tyle czasu ile może. Zastanów się nad sobą. stimoroll 07:54, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Cześć! Widziałem, że usunąłeś Image:Artur Balazs.jpg. Czy mógłbyś mi wkleić na stronę dyskusji zawartość strony tej grafiki (nie jestem adminem Commons, nie mogę tego sam zobaczyć). Chciałbym zobaczyć co źle zrobiłem w opisie licencji. Zdjęcie prawdopodobnie pochodziło z strony sejmu. Dziękuję z góry za pomoc. --kb 15:50, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nie rozumiem zatem dlaczego skasowałeś grafikę z szablonem {{SejmCopyright}}? Przecież źródło jest w tym przypadku oczywiste - strona sejmu. Możesz zrobić "undelete"? Poprawię opis i będzie ok. --kb 20:04, 24 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dziękuję. --kb 10:32, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Niewiem dlaczego skasowałeś MKDStruga1959.PNG, miałem pozwolenie autora, a zresztą to jest takie stare zdjęcie że.. PS: Czemu mnie zablokowałeś? (Tak jakis tam ostrzeżnia - tyle że ja don't' speak Engils ;])

Crusier= 83.24.99.123 19:41, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, why was this image deleted. I'm sure it had a license when I last looked at it. It was also used on Wikipedia. --Simonxag 20:40, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, thanks for the response. I think the image was unlicensed because Infrogmation blanked it and that's why you deleted it. I don't think he should have blanked it, but the license looks suspect and the image is up for deletion. Ah well, thanks anyway. --Simonxag 15:30, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Witam, usunąłeś fotografie kiedy było napisane w opisie, że uzyskano zgodę od autora do umieszczenia jej tutaj. O co chodzi? Dy-e 22:38, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rozumiem, wysłałem forwarda. Kiedy mogę oczekiwać reverta?Dy-e 22:56, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

forwardnij rowniez na mojego maila szczepan1990@gmail.com --Szczepan talk  22:59, 27 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for exhibiting trust in me in my recent request. I will do my best to continue to act in a way that will benefit the commons and the commons community. -- Avi 01:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

-N 07:30, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko 15:37, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The last three video files that I've uploaded are not "fair use", as I've emailed the author concerning whether he chose to license his works under a Commons-permissible license (specifically: GFDL, cc-by-sa, etc.). He responded positively, and copyright was directed to Red Hat, at which point I forwarded the email to permissions-commons. I can't find the exact mailing list webpage where this email would be found, and I'm not clear on the process of OTRS or if I have permission to use it, but I can say with affirmation (if not complete knowledge, as the copyright thing is confusing) that these files are not "fair use", and have been granted uploading permission and a Commons-permissible license by the author, Jonathan Blanford. Please RSVP, thanks. --Rayne Van-Dunem 02:44, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jest zgoda na wykorzystanie grafik użytkownika. Wpłynęła na OTRS pod numerem 2008011510009198. Mozna odtwarzać i oznaczyć grafiki. Pozdrawiam. Wpedzich 13:20, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You blocked this user for "Uploading unfree files after warnings" but since they are the photographer of the same name as per the OTRS ticket I've linked from their user page, I've unblocked them and will be restoring their uploads as appropriate. Regards. Adambro 01:21, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mógłbyś mi wytłumaczyć, dlaczego w moich grafikach, które należały do kategorii:Szopienice-Burowiec, zmieniłeś kategorię na: Szopienice? Przecież obecnie nie istnieje już dzielnica Szopienice, więc nowe grafiki nie mogą do niej należeć. Szopienice to historyczna dzielnica Katowic. Jednym słowem namieszałeś, a ja nie zwróciłam uwagi na to i też zaczęłam umieszczać w złej kategorii. Nawet już się nie dziwię, mam już doświadczenie do czego niektórzy są zdolni. Pozdrawiam Ewkaa 16:36, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for blocking me for no reason, jerk,

Gabriellerosey 05:21, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Gabriellerosey[reply]

Sorry Szczepan, i did not see the messages you leaved on my user page. i'm a newbe and do not understand the way wikipedia/wikimedia is working. i upload photos of my father that are mine. My Cosin Bruno Uderzo Junior took them in 1976. i scanned them. Do my father has to create its own user page to upload photos ? How can i upload frontpages from his books ? Scan them ? Thanks OlivierUderzo

Yeah, thanks for blocking me ONCE AGAIN. You must really hate me, don't you? PERSONAL ATTACK ON ME, much?

Oops, I said something about you again. Are you going to block me for that as well? Go shead, BLOCK ME, ANAL PROBE!!!

Gabriellerosey (talk) 22:39, 17 February 2008 (UTC)Gabriellerosey[reply]

Uwaga dotycząca Twego odzywania się do mnie dotyczy wszystkich projektów! Nie życzę sobie Twej obecności na stronach mojej dyskusji na żadnym projekcie należącym do Wikimedia! Joymaster 18:46, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Widzę, że czytanie tekstu z jednoczesnym jego zrozumieniem sprawia Ci olbrzymi problem... Ciekawe... Joymaster 21:49, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A jak jedziesz po epitetach, to powiem Ci tak, drogi Szczepanie - usunięto mi sajta dotyczącego ulic Gdyni - może łaskawie do sandboxa...? Joymaster 21:51, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, byłbym zapomniał, mam mały chyba zasób wiedzy z języka angielskiego - wytłumacz mi stwierdzenie "ANAL PROBE", które ktoś skierował ku Twej osobie? Mam kieszonkowe słowniki, nie obejmują one swym małym zasięgiem stwierdzenia probe (pierwsze to jak myślę dotyczy znanej sfery?). Joymaster 21:54, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A gdzie jest galeria pomników? Też Ci przeszkadzała? Brakowało dosłownie kilku i już do wycięcia? Wiesz, myslałem, że może mozna się obejść dookoła, ale jesli Ty to usunąłeś to napisz jakim prawem! A jeśli nie Ty, to odtwórz, bo zjeździłem ponad połowę Gdyni aby poznajdywać pomniki i powoli je wstawiam a jakiś maniak przycisku "delete" pokazuje nim wyższość. Joymaster 14:39, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A od utworzenia strony do możliwości jej skasowania ile jest czasu? Czyli konsensus. Dzięki.

Hi!

I noticed the deletion of Image:Archlinux-official-fullcolour.svg (log). I had the trouble of checking with Judd Vinet, one of the copyright holders, before uploading (still have that e-mail, heh). His answer at the time was that the arch logo was under the FDL license! Now they have it under CC noncommercial, but how does that relate to us having to remove it?

Please contact me at my discussion page, over at pt:Usuário Discussão:Jp. Thanks!

PS: You might want to check File:Archlinux logo.svg too.

Dear Szczepan1990,
Thank you for supporting my Request for Adminship. I’m honored by your trust and will do my best to help build a better site. Durova 21:02, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Start small, close obvious deletion discussions. Get bolder with experience. Pretty soon Commons will have ten thousand images! (giggles, flees) ;)

na stronie Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Przeobrażenia.jpg napisałeś, że skasowane, ale potem zmieniłeś zdanie. Zmień więc wpis także na stronie deletion requests. Julo 09:51, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I expect you have a good reason for blocking him indefinitely. If so, I'd like to hear it. --Janneman 23:18, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As it seems Szczepan is not online, so I'll try to answer for him.

As far as I can see the reason was continued trolling and a repeated personal attack on his talk-page after I blocked him for a day. Because Mutti is also blocked indef on de and en he is known as a wikimedia-troll, so there was no need of beeing verry nice with the duration of the block. It was shown in past that he often attacks users, wich is inappointelbly on a wiki where community-teamwork is as important as on commons.

Finally I totaly agree to the block. Tnaks, Szczepan. Regards, abf /talk to me/ 12:36, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

abf, I did not ask you. For good reasons, too, as there is no need to be especially nice to you either. I cannot find a single personal attack in his contributions since his initial block, least of all one that would warrant an indefinite block, just like that, without due process. It does not matter in the least what he did on w:de: months or even years ago. So, what's the story here, Szczepan? --Janneman 16:16, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do not care who you asked. And no *ironically* there was no new attack, he yust repeated the old one on his talk-page and threatened me. Beeing as forward + indef block on two other projects really justifyes a indef block here. Regards, abf /talk to me/ 18:37, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The so-called "attack" was labelling a picture of a canary as Jimbo. That little joke justifies no indefinite block IMHO. Having been blocked years ago (!) somewhere else also doesn't justify an indef block. Especially given the fact that Mutter Erde has been doing excellent work here on commons.

So, erm, are we waiting now for Szczepan1990 to return from his vacation to answer the question asked here (and it looks like he usually doesn't answer questions here anyway), or what's going to happen? PDD 22:01, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well; Szczepan seems to have time enough to complain about wrong license tags in the German Wikipedia on IRC this very minute, so I expect he'll find time to answer my question, will he now? --Janneman 22:10, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, schon gesehen? Offline-Sczepan ist wieder da. Hatte mir schon Sorgen um den gemacht Mutter Erde 19:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Witaj,

Zerknij na Image:Oscar cast max kolonko.jpg i Image:Odkrywanie ameryki.jpg - widzę, że dwukrotnie usuwałeś jako copyvio - zostało załadowane po raz trzeci. Pozdr Red 81 16:54, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

please stop deleting the files. This is our own graphic we own rights to it. Thez are used under fair clause condition on Commons. Please look it up.

Dzięki za poprawienie zdjęcie Roddy'ego Doyle'a. Pierwszy raz wrzucałam coś na Commons i wydawało mi się, że postępuję zgodnie z instrukcjami, a tu kaszana. --Hburdon 17:57, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

po co stale kasujesz grafiki kolonki? skasuj sie sam kolego.

sprawdzilem twoja history - reprezentujesz ideologie bedac administratorem - nie powinienes nim byc bo jestes uprzedzony. Wikipedia nie jest bna to miejscem. nie kasuj zatem grafik - dyskutuj ok? ty kasujesz - my ladujemy to nie prowadzi do niczego chyba jestesmy bardizej cywilizowani niz to? Poza tym grafiki sa wlasnoscia media 2000 i stad je mamy wiec jaki masz problem?

Hi, It has been brought to our attention that you have been deleting our uploads to commons regarding Max Kolonko.Please be advised that we (Media 2000 Communications based in NYC) are the copyright owner of these graphics allowing them for free wikipedia distribution. We are the producer of Max Kolonko programing in Poland. Please do not delete them. Should you have any questions regarding the grafics please contact me. best regards - yvette williams media2000

Hi, I uploaded that images some months ago. You deleted it three weeks later, and I'd like to know why: i released the image under the accepted licenses, so i supposed it was allowed? MADe 18:52, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Witaj. Czy mogę prosić o usunięcie grafiki? Pozdrawiam, Rudi pl 19:09, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dlaczego skasowałeś http://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Emilia_Szab%C5%82owska&diff=12257616&oldid=12148098 ? --79.162.14.185 05:26, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zdjęcie Image:Wojciech Cejrowski 1.jpg wysłał mi sam Cejrowski ze zgoda na publikację na licencji GNU FDL. Lzur 17:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

G'day

I just wanted to say a huge thanks for your support in my RfB. It just closed, and I'm now a bureaucrat. If you ever want to discuss any of my actions, as a 'crat, admin, or plain old user, please don't hesitate to leave a note on my talk page.

Cheers, giggy _(:O) 10:40, 24 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No nie rozumiem, a to może nadal pozostać? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Glassware_for_polish_bear_Królewskie_v1.jpg

Bo to poniżej usunąłeś. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Glassware_for_polish_bear_Królewskie_v2.jpg

FxJ 18:52, 6 CZE 2008 (UTC)

Witaj. Zgłaszam do usunięcia ten plik, który pochodzi stąd (ściągnij proszę ten plik, na stronie 8 znajduje się zdjęcie kościoła załadowane na commons). Pozdrawiam, pjahr ۞ 14:31, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Znalazłem stronę pinakoteka.zascianek.pl a w niej stronę czy mogę wykorzystywać obrazy artysty który już nie żyje? Jeśli tak to jakiego szablonu powinienem użyć? I jeszcze jedno pytanie jak założyć nową kategorie (dla fotek z tej strony jeśli można je wykorzystać).

Hello there! Thank you for supporting my request for adminship, which closed unsuccessfully. I appreciate people like you taking the time out to support my efforts to adding content to Wikimedia Commons, offering to translate picture captions on IRC at a moment's notice, deleting images, or cooperating with me on OTRS by getting free licensed permissions for hard to find pictures. Again, thank you for your support. Thanks for believing in me. Have a great day! Best wishes, miranda

Ten użytkownik był ponad rok temu zablokowany za lekceważenie licencji. Okres blokady minął, ale jak widać zaprzestał aktywności, przynajmniej z tego konta. Jeśli chcesz ocalić te zdjęcia, trzeba się raczej skontaktować bezpośrednio z ich autorem. A.J. (talk) 08:16, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was on the point of deleting Dendrobates castaneoticus since it's an emptied gallery, but I noticed you recently restored it. What was the reason for that ? :) Thanks, →Christian.И 12:12, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cześć! Dzięki za pionierską czujność ;). Ale mogłeś najpierw przeczytać art tyczący się tematu (a zwłaszcza ustęp o zgodzie przedstawiciela Lazarusa na publikację ich materiałów): pl:Baszta Panieńska (pod koniec artu). Tym niemniej przesyłam Ci także tekst maila z tą zgodą. Byłbym bardzo wdzięczny gdybyć mógł pozałatwiać to formalnie na commons bo nie bardzo oriętuję się jak to tutaj przprowadzić. Pozdrawiam serdecznie Electron (talk) 06:15, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Original Message-----

From: szlom@o2.pl [1] Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 2:14 PM To: Andrzej K. Subject: Re: Prośba o zgodę na wykorzystanie informacji i grafiki dotyczącej: Baszta Siedmiu Płaszczy

Witam. Jak najbardziej zgadzam się na wykorzystanie nawet całego tekstu. Ale mała prosba - jakaś adnotacja która by mówiła skąd sa te informacje. Szczerze to dośc długo wraz z braćmi zakonnymi szukaliśmy a właściwie kopaliśmy w resztach tego co ocalało po informacjach o baszcie, dlatego prosze o uszanowanie naszej pracy. Na przyszłośc MOżecie śmiało wykorzystywać materiały z naszej strony, ale prosba o wcześniejszą informacje o waszym zamiarze. POzdrawiam Serdecznie Grzegorz Kuklewski www.lazarus.zp.pl

Wiadomość Oryginalna ----

Od: "AK", akorol małpka o2 kropka pl Do: szlom@go2.pl Data: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:15:09 +0100 Temat: Prośba o zgodę na wykorzystanie informacji i grafiki dotyczącej: Baszta Siedmiu Płaszczy

> Witam! > > Prośba o zgodę na wykorzystanie informacji Nazywam się AK i jestem jednym z tworzących Wikipedię - polską, wolną od > opłat encyklopedię sieciową. > http://pl.wikipedia.org/ > > Zwracam się z zapytaniem o informacje i grafiki (zdjęcia) zawarte na > stronie http://www.lazarus.zp.pl/index.php?s=historia_b.html > Chciałbym zawarte tam informacje wykorzystać w tworzeniu artykułu, > dlatego proszę o zgodę na to. > > Ponieważ przykładamy dużą wagę do praw autorskich, to bez uzyskania > wyraźnej zgody autora, nie zamieścimy tych materiałów. Proszę > pamiętać, że tylko osoba posiadająca te prawa może wydać taką zgodę. > > Materiały zamieszczane na Wikipedii są umieszczane na zasadach > licencji GNU FDL (patrz http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_FDL ) Polskie > tłumaczenie znajduje się na > http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Free_Documentation_License_-_polskie_ > t%C5%8 > 2umaczenie > a dotycząca historii Baszty Siedmiu Płaszczy w Szczecinie. Tak się > nieszczęśliwie zdarzyło, że jeden z nieodpowiedzialnych wikipedystów > wykorzystał już te informacje w haśle: > http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baszta_Panie%C5%84ska > i jest podejrzenie że zrobił to bez udzielenia przez Pana zgody. > Są one bardzo dobrze zredagowane i cenne dla wikipedii, ale oczywiście > zostaną usuniete jeśli po wyjasnieniu sprawy okaże się, że nie ma na > to Pańskiej zgody. > > Brak odpowiedzi na ten mail będzie traktowany jako brak zgody na > wykorzystanie tych materiałów. > > Proszę pamiętać, że każdy może artykuły zamieszczone na Wikipedii > dowolnie modyfikować jak i zamieszczać nowe. Również Pan. > Jeśli zechce Pan redagować Wikipedię wraz z nami będzie nam bardzo miło. > > Proszę zwrócić też uwagę, że wyrażenie zgody oznacza, że materiał > będzie mógł być publikowany nie tylko na Wikipedii ale wszędzie pod > warunkiem zachowania licencji GNU FDL. Dlatego wydana zgoda nie może > być ograniczona dodatkowymi warunkami typu "tylko dla Wikipedii", > "tylko niekomercyjne wykorzystanie" ani "fair use". > > Pozdrawiam > > ======= AK ======== > ==========+ Electron +========== > ======== akorol małpka o2 kropka pl ======= > > > >

Aha... i wszystko jasne. Dzięki za treściwą odpowiedź... Tylko jak się tam zalogować? Bo inaczej to można oglądać tylko stronę startową... A ja nie jestem bywalcem i nie nie mam tam konta. Jak się na tym znasz to jak już pisałem nie obraził bym się jakbyś mi pomógł zrobić to co należy. Pozdrawiam 06:24, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

czesc

Autor zdjecia [2] wyraził zgode na publikacje zapytałem go tu [3] odesłał mi zgode w liscie z forum (patrz załącznik (poszedl w mailu))

mam jeszcze raz do niego pisac?

przy okazji skasuj prosze Image:FlagaMoraga.svg przesłałem juz pod poprawną nazwą Telewizjamsi (talk) 07:38, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi did you create Image:Ophiel.svg? If you did then please change the license to {{PD-self}}. If you didn't create it then please update the image so that it contains source info. /Lokal_Profil 00:19, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks =) /Lokal_Profil 01:20, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Grafiki podane w pierwszym linku nie są moje i nie ma też takich na commons - ja zrobiłem podobne, ale jednak inne. Wyglądają na zrobione tej samej nocy, więc najwyraźniej stąd podobieństwo. Te umieszczone na stronie Muzeum Lubelskiego robione są z okna zamku, natomiast moje z dziedzińca - przyjrzyj się proszę perspektywie. Natomiast zdjęcia w drugim linku jak najbardziej moje - wszystkie oprócz zdjęcia przedwojennego. Ktoś musiał skopiować z commons, ale to dobrze, bo po to dałem taką licencję a nie inną. Pozdrawiam, Szater

Czesc. Czemu skasowałes z commonsa P3050334.JPG. Cos nie tak? Pozdro Telewizjamsi (talk) 13:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

You are deleting a lot of files with just the simple comment "derivative work". But I cannot see any RfD or talk about it. E. g. The logo of Image:Flasche Veltins.jpg has no threshold of originality, see Commons:Derivative_works#Isn.27t_every_product_copyrighted_by_someone.3F_What_about_cars.3F_Or_kitchen_chairs.3F_My_computer_case.3F. I want you to stop deleting and request your activity on COM:DEL. Also I want to have the content of Image:Flasche Diebels Alt.jpg and Image:Flasche Jever.jpg, because I have no local copy these files and had no chance save it on my computer, in oder to move the to the German Wikipedia. --Euku:^⇄ 14:15, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am a user from Hungary, lawyer by profesion.

I am also really surprised and donT know why did you delete these illustrations.

I hope you know that Heineken owns several trade marks containing the red star. Trademarks are not "violations of copyright". Accordingly, you should consult lawyers about this topic.--84.206.41.238 14:29, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like a one-man action of you, Szczepan1990. Shouldn't there be some deletion requests about the images? --Tuvic (talk) 14:30, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please undelete all and open a regular deletion request. --Kjetil_r 14:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Szczepan1990__and_mass_deletions. --Kjetil_r 14:54, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

from http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Euku&diff=12994899&oldid=12273849

1. Hello, the result of this voting grants me leave to delete all images of this type
2. http://91.197.89.189/5elvpb49anu76rzmykh85byb6i9h8c7.jpg http://91.197.89.189/7tqst5wns106w9c16ra1iutwiodrffl.jpg

--Szczepan talk  14:23, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep discussions together..

A discussion is not a voting! I cannot see any comments or as you call it "votes", that grant you to delete all images of type X. Because

1. there were no discussion, no talk

2. each image is an individual case, that is worth to talk about. As you can see the logo of Veltins has no threshold of originality (de:Schöpfungshöhe) in Germany. The bottle is a daily object.

3. You must notify the file uploader. -> Help:Mass deletion request

4. The User:CommonsDelinker is causing harm in all Wikipedias.

You nominated this image and you are deleting other images by pointing on this discussion by your self. That means you are the nominator and the admin who is deleting the file. --Euku:^⇄ 15:03, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are wrong, Commons:Deletion_requests/Image:Żubr_beer.JPG request was closed by me. Design of label on this bottle is complex enough to be copyrighted. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What's that? Why did you delete the pictures Image:2007-11-14BlaueGlasflaschen04.jpg + Image:2007-11-14BlaueGlasflaschen07.jpg? There is not any reason for deleting, those were no derivate works at all! You even gave no information about your intention to delete them, that's really no good behaviour. So please undelete them immediately! --Wildfeuer (talk) 14:39, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please advise why this image was deleted as a derivative work, when it was uploaded under {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}}, without any notification being placed on my Talk page regarding it? Had someone queried me about it I would have had the opportunity to advise that I created the original image used for the label, therefore it was not a derivative work as claimed, note the bottle shape itself is generic and therefore not copyrighted. Could you please replace the image back on the database and also in my gallery! It also appears you have deleted about 95 other similar images for the same reason. This does seem extreme and based only on your own judgement, with no opportunity for the uploaders to challenge the deletions before they occured. Richard Harvey (talk) 15:03, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain why you deleted Image:Aecht schlenkerla rauchbier.jpg without a deletion request or without putting something like {{Derivative work}} on the imge page? Please restore the image and its usages and make a proper request. --ALE! ¿…? 16:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a discussion on Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#admin_User:Szczepan1990_is_deleting_a_lot_of_fotos_of_beer_bottles_without_proper_deletion_request on your behaviour. Please note: It is nothing personal against you but your actions seem to be out of the proper procedures. --ALE! ¿…? 16:10, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

	Thanks for taking part in my RFA. It passed 29-5-0, and I appreciate and will take to heart all of the feedback, and do my absolute best to better Commons with the trust placed in me by the community as a whole. rootology (T) 17:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gambrinus Can you tell me, why you deleted my can of Austrian Gambrinus beer? It is not derivative work, but my own picture of a can of beer. But I think you made upset more people. What can we do there will be always smarter people, who understand everything better like you. Thank you for your smart destructive activity.--Petrberka (talk) 07:49, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please return the semen2.jpg image that you recently deleted? The article has been used for quite a long time on the en.wikipedia semen article. It survived a deletion request in November of 2006. I object to it being deleted with no notification on the page where it was primartily used.[[4]] How could anyone partitipate in the deletion discussion if the articles that it was used on are not notified? Atomaton (talk) 03:30, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Semen2.jpg --Szczepan talk  18:05, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Would you vote to restore? It was obviously a mistake. Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#image:semen2.jpg

Hi Szczepan1990, thanks for participating in my RfA, which passed with all 26 participants supporting. I appreciate the trust that the community is put in me and I look forward to closing DRs and deleting obvious copyvios. Thanks, Anonymous101 ^talk 12:06, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Borrarla si quereis, la puse en un articulo wikipedia peor resultó ser de hace tres años, y la web de donde la saqué tampoco decia mucho. --Ravave (talk) 08:25, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Greetings, Was the result of this deletion proposal never administered? Smooth0707 (talk) 00:54, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Could you please take a look at this users actions and stop him causing his trouble (User:Thomas Gun), he has been banned indefinitely from EN:WP under his main username there of w:User:Yorkshirian See his:- EN Wiki Page, also see:- Arbcon He now appears to be causing his trouble here and seems to have targeted me. See:- Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Get_this_guy_off_Wikicommons and Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. At the present time he is reverting the changes I made to what I feel are his attempts at starting an edit war. I will not revert his current changes until the issue is sorted out, nor will I upload any further images as long as this disruptive editor remains on Wikicommons. Richard Harvey (talk) 13:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This image was deleted off commons but I'm wondering if it can be sent to wikipedia so we don't have to recreate each aspect including the work the graphics lab did? Benjiboi (talk) 01:30, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zrobilem sobie konto globalne jako "Tvmsi" a mam konto "Telewizjamsi". Moglbys zalatwic, zeby admini (biurokraci) to zintegrowali na "Tvmsi" ? Pozdro Telewizjamsi (talk) 16:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

About logotype of iperú in Commons. The "i" into a circle is a universal sign for "tourist information". The true Iperú Logotipe is the "i" into a circle (the universal sign) and bottom this, the word "perú". Therefore, iperu is a peruvian government bureau, like NASA in the USA.

So, I uploaded a pic with both signs but this one that I created with both signs. Is not the official and registered logo of iperú that appears in [5]. It is based in their logo. Because I used the "i" and next to the word "peru".

What can I do? I need a suggestion to add an good logotype, without problems of copyright.

Thank you for your help, and sorry by my bad English... :D --EdwinJs (talk) 22:57, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Jestem w kontakcie z panem Rynkiewiczem - ma załatwić pozwolenie od fotografa, który mu robił tą fotkę. Póki co można kasować zgodnie z zasadami Wiki. Pozdrawiam serdecznie, Vikom (talk) 14:52, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello Szczepan1990!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:19, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Image:Marta Walesiak.jpg is uncategorized since 2 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:19, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Image:Ubuntu610.png was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:QuickEK 3.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:QuickEK 1.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:QuickEK 4.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:QuickEK 5.PNG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
• Image:Prawostronny obszar krytyczny.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.

Jakim prawem usunąłeś zgody uzyskane przeze mnie? Nie jest to ważne czy były to zgody dobre czy złe. Ważne jest to, że skan mógł tu istnieć! Joymaster (talk) 13:23, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cze. Dzięki za maila, ale ja miałem zgodę na użycie tych zdjęć - napisałem o tym kilka lat temu na polskiej Wiki. Jak nie wierzysz, to możesz sam napisać do nich.

PS. Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku. WOLNA PALESTYNA! Pietras1988 18:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi! I wonder why this image was not deleted. Please note: it is not used anymore on any project. -- Basilicofresco (talk) 18:14, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ejże! Z jakiego powodu usunąłeś? Albertus teolog (talk) 18:54, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. dokonałeś nadinterpretacji wychodząc przed szereg,
2. istnieje mechanizm i dobry obyczaj powiadamiania przed usunięciem czegokolwiek Albertus teolog (talk) 21:59, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Co do T-19 - bazowałem na znalezionej w sieci wersji PNG na której (przynajmniej mi a wzrok mam dobry) trudno było zauważyć postrzępienie pędzla, ale skoro jest błąd to moge poprawić.

Natomiast jeśli chodzi o te białe prostokąty w D-39... odnosze wrażenie że w PNG-kach też są błędy. I co teraz?

Miko101 (talk) 11:02, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo,

as I see, you made some rash deletions and commited some few faults. You deleted these files:

• File:Znak ST.svg
• File:Znak STK.svg
• File:Znak SB.svg
• File:Znak STT-1.svg
• File:Znak STT-2.svg

even thought they was used in some article.

Please read Commons:Deletion policy#General procedure and Commons:Deletion policy#Duplicates. The deletion of duplicate is possible after checking of usage by CheckUsage. All its occurences have be redirected to the kept version. Used duplicate files may not be deleted.

You have disturbed this principle at least in these 5 cases, in result of which CommonsDelinker took out them from the article instead of replacing. In addition, you don't stated names of the new files into edit summary by the deletion.

I have fixed the article Signály pro tramvaje a veřejnou dopravu allready. Please, be more carefull for the next time. --ŠJů (talk) 15:40, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grafiki będzie trzeba usunąć. Autor nie ufa OTRS. Między innymi ze względu na ton w jakim jego członkowie pracują (przeczytaj sobie wpis jaki zostawiłeś na mojej stronie dyskusji - mało "user-friendly"). Jako jedynie władnej organizacji weryfikującej uprawnienia (sprawiacie wrażenie IPNu. Równie szczelnego i równie kompetentnego). No cóż. Przez ten "nowo-twór" nie jedna osoba już nie udostępniła grafik na wolnej licencji... Ja się mogę tylko przychylić do jego (autora fotek) opinii - system OTRS działa na szkodę projektu. Radomil talk 06:58, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:BEL Brussels flag.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 06:22, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Witaj!

Joymastera nie ma od 4 listopada. Wcześniej nie było go kilka miesięcy. Mówił, że spędził je w szpitalu. Więc martwię się. Zrób wyjątek i sam poproś o weryfikację pozwolenia. Sam widzisz, nie wiemy co z nim jest. Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 19:24, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wanna know the reason you deleting this file in 2007. I can't find any page which has described this operation. So can you provide me one? --PhiLiP (talk) 04:43, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Salut à toi. Désolé mais ta photo n'est pas celle du Mont Pelat (3050m) : il s'agit de celle de l'échine située à 650 mètres à l'Est et culminant à 2973 mètres. A toi d'en rectifier la légende. Bien cordialement. --André Payan-Passeron (talk) 20:07, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Au lieu de me remercier de vous avoir signalé votre erreur pour le "Mont_Pelat_6.jpg", vous préférez mettre en cause - de manière subjective et sans fondement juridique - les deux photos - Entraunes_Wikipédia_001d - et - Entraunes_Wikipédia_003a - pour lesquelles j'ai parfaitement respecté "les droits de la vie privée" conformément aux règles applicables en la matière. Merci d'être "fair play" et de modifier en conséquence votre appréciation. Bien cordialement. --André Payan-Passeron (talk) 08:17, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wydaje mi się że na Commons nie istnieje coś takiego jak Specjalna:Rejestr. Sugeruję zmianę na Special:Log. Dodatkowo, że jakoś wydaje mi się że większość stron na commons to właśnie "strony" to sugeruję również zmianę tego. Marcin Łukasz Kiejzik (T @) 06:11, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Szczepan1990. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you Trijnstel (talk) 21:46, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: [6]. Czy moglbys podac informacje, jak niedokladna byla licencja / opis? Bo tutaj osoba na zdjeciu publicznie skarzy sie, ze zdjecie wykonane przez jej meza bylo kasowane, i nie wie jak je udostepnic wikipedii. Czy ten blog nie wystarczy na dowod autorstwa? Najlepiej, jakbys mogl na blogu sam sie wypowiedziec, Przykuta juz tam wyjasnial jak nowe zdjecie dodac, ale warto by ktos wyjanil jej i swiatu, czemu stare zdjecie poszlo... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 17:36, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In 2006, you uploaded File:Relief.JPG, without actually describing it. I mean, it's a relief, yes, but... of what? We had three images called "relief dot jpg" (with various capitalizations), but the others at least had enough details provided so that I could determine that one was from an Indonesian temple and the other was from a Roman temple. This one has no information.

Do you remember what it was, where you saw it, etc? DS (talk) 15:26, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Szczepan1990, you contributed to MediaWiki:Sp-contributions-footer-anon/pl. I just wanted to tell you that the English version contains much more links. Either you update the Polish version or just delete the page - then all Polish users see the English version. I guess the links are not that hard to understand anyway. We also could integrate the translation of the link titles in the new link template which is in the English version. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 20:27, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! However, you did use fixed http: links for commons and toolserver - both should be protocol relative URLs to enable staying on https for users who use it. I have taken your translations and moved them to the common link template to have less work for future updates of URLs. --Saibo (Δ) 21:19, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Nunatsiavut flag.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 20:36, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You didn't provide a license of the flag of Nunatsiavut and it was deleted. Thanks to God archive.org exists and I saved the file. Should I upload it under name "Nunatsiavut flag.svg" or "Flag of Nunatsiavut.svg"? And could you help me with this file? Source is here. Thanks. Hosmich (talk) 14:51, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, there is a de-flag proposal at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag which affects your bot. Regards --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:26, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Szczepan1990, I'm writing to you because your bot Szczepan.bot (talk · contributions · Statistics · Recent activity · block log · User rights log · uploads · Global account information) (assign permissions) is about to be de-flagged as a result of inactivity. If you'd like to keep that account flagged as a bot, please speak up at Commons:Bots/Requests/de-flag#Discussion; otherwise, I'll remove the bot flag from that account in a week from now (20 February 2014). Thanks for your understanding, odder (talk) 22:32, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Czy mógłbyś przejrzeć i ewentualnie dodać odpowiednią kategorię? Zwiadowca ²¹ 20:12, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

prosze usun to moje zdjęcie jak w tytule, nie przemyślana decyzja z mojej strony a zastapiłem je już nowym Diabetes (talk) 13:27, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:POL Kobiele Wielkie flag.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Guanaco (talk) 04:38, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wiza białoruska.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Spartaz (talk) 22:12, 8 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]