Talk:Appropriation bill

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Finance & Investment Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Economics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Category

The following sources contain public domain or freely licensed material that may be incorporated into this article: GAO guide to federal appropriations ‌

I'm not exactly sure what in Canada serves this purpose, we don't seem to identify with these terms, I assume it's just 'The Budget' SJrX10 (talk) 21:20, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In Canada a "money" bill that implements the budget speach is known as a Supply Bill. Parliament (and provincial legistlatures) must vote supply, thus a minority government can also fall it it fails to secure a majority vote on a supply bill.

An example, form the www.parl.gc.ca C-6R — The President of the Treasury Board — An Act for granting to Her Majesty certain sums of money for the federal public administration for the financial year ending March 31, 2010 Supplementary Estimates (C), 2009-2010 — Concurred in — March 23, 2010 (See Business of Supply No. 3) Read the first time; read the second time and referred to a Committee of the Whole; considered in Committee of the Whole; reported without amendment; concurred in at report stage; read the third time and passed Passed by the Senate — March 30, 2010 Adoption par le Sénat — 30 mars 2010 Royal Assent (Chapter No. 1) — March 31, 2010

From http://www2.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Language=E&Mode=1&Parl=40&Ses=3&DocId=4364458#DOC--4372591 Journals of March 23, 2010

Mr. Day (President of the Treasury Board), seconded by Mr. O'Connor (Minister of State), moved, — That this House do concur in Interim Supply as follows: M. Day (président du Conseil du Trésor), appuyé par M. O'Connor (ministre d’État), propose, That a sum not exceeding $27,249,740,435.50 being composed of:

(1) three twelfths ($19,721,272,993.00) of the total of the amounts of the items set forth in the Proposed Schedule 1 and Schedule 2 of the Main Estimates for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2011, which were laid upon the Table Wednesday, March 3, 2010, except for those items below: (2) eleven twelfths of the total of the amount of Canadian Grain Commission Vote 40, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Vote 15, Canadian Air Transport Security Authority Vote 25 and Treasury Board Vote 5 (Schedule 1.1), of the said Estimates, $1,009,187,981.08; (3) seven twelfths of the total of the amount of Canada Council for the Arts Vote 10, Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety Vote 25, Justice Vote 1 and Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission Vote 20 (Schedule 1.2) of the said Estimates, $282,925,437.67; (4) six twelfths of the total of the amount of Human Resources and Skills Development Vote 5 and Indian Affairs and Northern Development Vote 20 (Schedule 1.3) of the said Estimates, $1,071,498,468.50; (5) five twelfths of the total of the amount of National Arts Centre Corporation Vote 65, National Battlefields Commission Vote 70, Indian Affairs and Northern Development Vote 10, Statistics Canada Vote 105, The Jacques Cartier and Champlain Bridges Incorporated Vote 70 and VIA Rail Canada Inc. Vote 80 (Schedule 1.4), of the said Estimates, $2,963,624,841.24; (6) four twelfths of the total of the amount of Canadian Broadcasting Corporation Vote 15, Public Service Commission Vote 105, Citizenship and Immigration Vote 5, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency Vote 15, Foreign Affairs and International Trade Vote 1, Canadian International Development Agency Vote 20, Health Vote 10, Indian Affairs and Northern Development Vote 1, Industry Vote 1, Canadian Space Agency Vote 35, Library of Parliament Vote 10, Office of the Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner Vote 15 and Marine Atlantic Inc. Vote 40 (Schedule 1.5), of the said Estimates, $2,201,230,714.01; be granted to Her Majesty on account of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2011. The question was put on the motion and it was agreed to on the following division:

Quinteperegrine (talk) 12:01, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I can tell, there's no article dedicated to the Federal (i.e. United States) appropriations process. The public-domain source I've included above should provide good seed material. Agradman ^talk/_contribs 02:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This article says "According to the United States Constitution (Article I, Section 7, clause 1), all bills relating to revenue, generally tax bills, must originate in the House of Representatives, consistent with the Westminster system requiring all money bills to originate in the lower house which is why the appropriations bills that are enacted begin with "H.R.", indicating a bill that originated in the House." It starts out talking about revenue bills, and then jumps to appropriations without mentioning constitutional or statutory authority.

In addition, HR stands for House Resolution, and isn't confined to money bills, to my knowledge; again, there's no Constitutional mandate that I'm aware of requiring appropriation bills also to be initiated by the House.Georgia Yankee (talk) 20:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Constitution says that Congress has power "To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years." Appropriations for the Navy, and the Air Force can be for more than two years. Congress has power "To provide and maintain a Navy" but that clause follows the earlier one on Armies. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:53, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Australian Parliament uses these terms but there is no content on the Australian system other than the vague mention of Whitlam's Dismissal by Sir John Kerr. Could someone please add appropriate content?

Is this another name for a money bill? Both articles even refer to the same term, "supply bill". Should they be merged? —ajf (talk) 21:27, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose. A money bill is about taxation (revenue) or spending, while an appropriation bill, especially in the United States, is only about spending (although it seems that an appropriation bill in New Zealand can be about both taxation and spending). --Neo-Jay (talk) 03:39, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Appropriation bill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060821155154/http://zfacts.com/p/272.html to http://zfacts.com/p/272.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:32, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]