Talk:CoreLogic

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 April 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments

I examined the references for this article and discovered that many of them were faulty and did not back up what was in the article, so I also challenged and removed the information, which looks like it was written by public relations people for this organization. There were some dead links, which I also marked. The article claims that it serves 40,000 customers, so that claim rules out a WP:Speedy deletion. Nevertheless, the rest of the article does not demonstrate that this business is WP:Notable in any way, so I will propose that it be deleted after discussion. Thank you. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 17:38, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added a good source for the revenue, and even added a photo of their HQ building from the highway. I notice the deletion discussion was closed as keep but I'm still going to see what history and additional product info I can add to make this a better article.Timtempleton (talk) 19:23, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should “Traded as NYSE:CLGX” be removed because it is no longer a private company? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GameOfAwesome (talk • contribs) 18:37, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@GameOfAwesome: Good catch - I removed it. Coincidentally, I read about their acquisition and just created an article draft about their new owner, Stone Point Capital. SPC was salted years ago for not being notable and being repeatedly recreated, so I'm waiting for the draft to be approved and moved to mainspace. Draft:Stone Point Capital. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 23:36, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]