Jump to content

Talk:Curt Anderson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeCurt Anderson was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 6, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed

Comment

[edit]

I created this page for Delegate Anderson. As I am new to Wikipedia, i would appreciate any constructive critcisms. I tried to follow your format and provide verifications when available.Administrative Aide Caryn YorkMarylandstate 22:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After a very quick reading, it looks pretty good to me; however, I would remove the small "43rd District team at the Charles Village parade" photo, as it is very tiny even when not viewed in thumbnail mode, and just clutters the page, in my opinion. It's a scrapbook type of photo that detracts from the encyclopedic content. - Itsfullofstars 22:20, 24 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice!Marylandstate 04:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The section about the electric rate increase does not tell both sides of the story. It makes the legislature out to be the saviours of the situation, when they actually just took the Gov's plan and removed the option to enroll in the deferred payment plan and made it mandatory for everyone.70.161.115.212 (talk) 04:37, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Anderson78.jpg

[edit]

Image:Anderson78.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:35, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A Wikipedian?

[edit]

http://www.abc2news.com/news/local/story.aspx?content_id=43d116f7-10ca-4b47-9319-35f57a9a025bRandom832 17:10, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Curt Anderson GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:Curt Anderson/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I shall be reviewing this page against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:41, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quick fail criteria assessment

  1. The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
  2. The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
  3. There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
  4. The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
  5. The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.


OK when checking against quick fail criteria, passing on to substantive review. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:51, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    • Th legislative notes section is an embedded list which does not accord with the MoS. This material should be rewritten as prose and incorporated into the previous section Done. legislative notes section has been stricken and incorporated in previous section--..BlackThorTalkContribs 01:06, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    • ref #10 [1] does not support the cited statement ref#10 has been redone--..BlackThorTalkContribs 01:35, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      ref #7 links to material which appears to be a copyright violation - if it is to remain we need clear proof that this is not such a violation; ref #16 [2] appears to be a self published source - find the actual publication of this this; ref #26 [3]is a copy of a newspaper article on another site - please cite the original; ref #28 [4] is over two years ago - is the bill still sitting on the geovernors desk?; ref #29 [5] links to material which appears to be a copyright violation - if it is to remain we need clear proof that this is not such a violation; EL to Facebook should not be there, see Wikipedia:EL.
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    • See above
    c (OR):
  2. It is broad in its scope.
    a (major aspects):
    • No mention of his divorce - the whole article reads like a CV as I said above. It would be good to see some other viewpoints on his career.
    b (focused):
    • Too many minor details such as the number of doors knocked on, e.g. The team knocked on more than 20,000 doors, mailed nearly 100,000 thousand pieces of literature.... Also the sentence Other news anchors in Baltimore during Anderson's tenure included Oprah Winfrey, Jerry Turner, Mike Hambrick, Ron Smith, Sue Simmons, Vince Bagli and Spencer Christian. is not necessary. Neither is This first campaign coincided with the entry into electoral politics of fellow Baltimore City politician and eventual mayor Kurt Schmoke. The sentences listed above have been stricken.--..BlackThorTalkContribs 01:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC) The whole section on slots could be summarised as "Anderson was a prominent opponent of the propsals."[reply]
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    • No representation of opposing points of view about the subject
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  5. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  6. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    • After due consideration I am not going to list this article at the present time as there are a large number of issues cited above. Primarily the question of neutrality of an article created by and largely edited by an aide. There are a number of dead links and others which do not support the stated facts. It may be best to enlist a neutral editors and work with them to bring this up to good article standards. Jezhotwells (talk) 15:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.examiner.com/a-1250279~Md__Democrats_headed_to_Ohio_for_presidential_campaigning.html
    Triggered by (?<=[/@.])examiner\.com(?:[:/?\x{23}]|$) on the local blacklist
  • http://www.examiner.com/a-1213276~Obama_s_surge_could_change_Md__s_political_future.html
    Triggered by (?<=[/@.])examiner\.com(?:[:/?\x{23}]|$) on the local blacklist
  • http://www.examiner.com/a-1250279~Md__Democrats_headed_to_Ohio_for_presidential_campaigning.html
    Triggered by (?<=[/@.])examiner\.com(?:[:/?\x{23}]|$) on the local blacklist
  • http://www.examiner.com/a-636809~Maryland_House_rejects_parole_for_drug_offenses.html
    Triggered by (?<=[/@.])examiner\.com(?:[:/?\x{23}]|$) on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:38, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Curt Anderson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:54, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Curt Anderson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:53, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Curt Anderson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:40, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Curt Anderson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:48, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]