Talk:Drusus Caesar

Drusus Caesar has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 22, 2018. (Reviewed version).

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Royalty and Nobility This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility. Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

"Drusus married Aemilia Lepida, daughter of Marcus Aemilius Lepidus, his second cousin." This seems to imply that Aemilia is his second cousin, although it could also mean Marcus is his second cousin. I think this should be rewritten to better clarify, eg:
    Drusus married Aemilia Lepida, his second cousin and daughter of Aemilius Lepidus.
    Drusus married Aemilia Lepida, daughter of his second cousin Marcus Aemilius. RealmRPGer (talk) 18:36, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is Drusus Caesar a satisfactory way of disambiguating this person from Drusus Julius Caesar, son of Tiberius, Castor in "I, Claudius"? PatGallacher (talk) 16:01, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Drusus Caesar/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 00:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 00:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• No DAB links Y (There is one DAB link but it is an other uses template).
• No Dead links Y
• Images appropriately licensed Y

• Sejanus had become powerful in Rome and is believed by ancient writers such as Suetonius and Tacitus to have been responsible for the downfall of Drusus the younger. suggest Sejanus, the prefect of the Praetorian Guard, had become powerful in Rome and is believed by ancient writers such as Suetonius and Tacitus to have been responsible for the downfall of Drusus the younger.

done

• Germanicus was for some time considered the new heir by Augustus, but Augustus later decided in favor of his stepson Tiberius. Was Germanicus considered the heir, but Augustus later declared it for Tiberius, or did Augustus consider Germanicus a potential heir, but later decided to choose Tiberius instead?

Germanicus was considered a potential heir. It's now explained in the article.

• Which had made him popular as he avenged the Roman defeat at the Battle of Teutoburg Forest. Might want to put an adjective on Battle of Teutoburg Forest, suggest the humiliating Roman defeat at the Battle of Teutoburg Forest.

done

• At the direction of Tiberius, Germanicus was dispatched to Asia to reorganize the provinces and assert imperial authority there. Was there a particular reason that imperial authority wasn't being asserted, or was it simply lack of attention?

the provinces were in a disarray - now in article

• whereas modern authors like Barbara Levick are more critical suggesting it may have been illness suggest whereas modern authors, such as Barbara Levick, suggest that it was may have been due to illness.

done

• @SpartaN: That is all my comments. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 15:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"@Iazyges: I think that's it. Thanks! SpartaN (talk) 15:24, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Iazyges and SpartaN: Bingham 1999 and Adams 2007 are not given bibliographical details for, please fix that. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:05, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Finnusertop: - done. Thanks for spotting that. Those sections were heavily edited and it slipped through I guess. SpartaN (talk) 16:11, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]