This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
I reorganized the sections a bit to put the earlier (Hinayana) interpretations together (notably moving the 'Nirvana' section there) and bumped
the section headings down 1 level for the Mahayana paragraphs; added a few wikilinks and added (I hope) clarifications here and there. Good article! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.139.6.67 (talk) 04:29, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please note, using Thanissaro's translation in this topic allows bias to creep in, as he is a well-known exponent of the "original mind" thesis. In particular, the Pali passage from the Anguttara says pabhassaram idam bhikkhave cittam, "This mind is radiant", not "*the* mind is radiant" per Thanissaro. Pali lacks a definite article. Here, idam serves to particularize and specify the kind of mind that is under discussion, i.e. the mind that is "developed" in meditation aka jhana. It is not a general statement about the nature of the mind. This error has been refuted countless times, nevertheless, it persists.