User talk:BigHairRef

I patrol Wikipedia using Huggle, and previously using VandalProof before it broke. If, while doing so, you believe I have made a mistake, please note: Most Huggle work I do involves patrolling new pages. Because of the IRC feed it is possible to review upwards of 30 pages per minute using this tool and tag up to 15 ppm if a page is obviously going to fail a speedy deletion. Huggle allows me to tag and leave messages whilst looking at other pages, just because of my speed does not mean I just tag pages for the sake of it without reading. If I am wrong then all I can say is sorry but I made a mistake like we all do and hopefully the tag, PROD or XFD will fail. I am not on Wikipedia 24/7. I've I have made a mistake I usually realise my error and revert it. If I haven't after a few minutes feel free to leave a message If I don't revert a bad edit after a few minutes I made feel free to point it out. I usually spot when I've made bad edits so at least give me a minute to revert any tagging if it's clearly wrong. If your article is sub stub, but you're going to improve it, please make sure you tag the article so I know you're not just going to leave it like most of the new pages I come accross. If I see it's not intended to be the finished product then I'll back off.

If you leave a message on my talk page I will leave replies on your talk page

Vandal Count vn- 8 This user talk page has been vandalized 8 times.

BigHairRef is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This user is in college. This user is taking a wikibreak and may be away or inactive for varying periods of time. Although they may occasionally be able to do some editing, messages left for them may not be replied to for a while. They will be back on Wikipedia when college is over.

Archives

December 2006 - January 2008 February 2008 - July 2008

Welcome!

Hello, BigHairRef, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  bibliomaniac15 Review? 01:09, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you claim stating a fact about ray comfort is a breach of neutral point of view facts are never in breach of neutrality!--203.192.91.4 (talk) 13:00, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"The reason is that you added an unsourced statement" Nice statement apart fromt he fact its wrong. So how does being neutral overide the truth?--203.192.91.4 (talk) 15:04, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You might also want to have a look how wikipedia rules say not to include unsourced material! Oh wait you where claiming I did that before, but you put back referenced material I delted, so you know the rule! So why are you breaking it?--203.192.91.4 (talk) 15:07, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok so your saying you dont know ray comfort is a fundamentalist, then maybe you should not stick you ideas on a topic you do not know about and are unwilling to educate yourself on! You could email him and ask him yourself if thats what it takes! The fact he is a fundamentalist and people do not like it is not in the rules to remove to remove a fact that was referenced!

"I have read the policies you cite and I suggest you read the ones I have mentioned as they clearly encompass this situation"

Thats lawyering and your opinion on the rules, which is offcoruse wrong.

Show me in the rules where it says to exclude a verified fact?--203.192.91.4 (talk) 07:46, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Creations of satyajit ray, though not a good title, does not fit into the critria established for WP:CSD A1, No context. the context is clear and obvious. Similarly The Billy Goat Caller though an impossibly bad article, also does not meet that definition. Also For a no construction tag, it is usual to allow 7 days for completion of the article, not 2 hours. I see a number of other people have mad similar complaints about your speedy deletions.

Now, I note you were using Huggle. If you are going to use automated tools, you have a special responsibility to make sure to use them correctly. I would strongly advise you (and for that matter everyone) to stop using it for speedy deletion marking. DGG (talk) 09:30, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Thanks for the review of Bradford City A.F.C. season 2007-08. I was very surprised to see it all passed when I logged on. I'll see if there are any more images possible, though I'm not sure there are. But would you have any other recommendations for pushing towards FAC. Peanut4 (talk) 10:30, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Basically VP is dead, and I did communicate with amidaniel about it, but he doesn't appear to have done anything about that. I would strongly recommend WP:HUGGLE as a much better and up to date tool. Prodego ^talk 14:42, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I offered to do as you suggest a while ago, but amidaniel indicated that he would like to do that himself, so I am reluctant to. And he is still around, but rarely edits. Prodego ^talk 00:41, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed this edit and wondered where the discussion regarding it was? --Dweller (talk) 15:24, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Might have been an idea to drop a line to the creator or the main contributor... oops, that's me twice :-) No worries. The title's not really appropriate, as I don't think it's ever called "cricket clothing" that I know of, but I've kicked off a debate at WT:CRIC to find its best home... it might end up being merged. --Dweller (talk) 18:57, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I moved your review from the article talk page to Talk:James Nesbitt/GA1 as per Wikipedia:Good article nominations process. I came by to learn how others do it! Hope you don't mind. Edmund Patrick – confer 17:28, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, he was editing the page and noticed the message above and attempted to fight the deletion. Or at least that is what i believe. Please consider the page ignore the other person. I begun the page and really believe it is a page the deserves to be there. thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mido z05 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well,I just removed duplicate sections from this article. This is no vandalism. But yes i did not write about it in the reasons field. I will take care next time. Nitinbajaj1 (talk) 05:29, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for marking the page with Speedy Delete, it si defenetly time for that to go since the project happened and was successful.

Thanks Stealth (talk)

Hi BigHairRef, you prodded this article but I note that it has been speedied and re-created numerous times. I listed it at AfD. Regards, Accurizer (talk) 00:08, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I was the prod2 guy. After looking at the user's talk page I reconsidered that approach. Have a good one. Regards, Accurizer (talk) 00:15, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No worries! Take care. Accurizer (talk) 00:20, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BigHairRef! Aiav is not a spelling mistake, it's redirect to Wikipedia:AIAV! The Ogre (talk) 20:58, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well... I always type aiav (which is rendered as Aiav, as you know), so I thought it could be a good redirect... But if you really think it's not a good idea, please feel free to delete it. Cheers! The Ogre (talk) 21:06, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not speedy incomplete articles the same minute (literally, in this case) they are created, but allow time for people to finish writing the article. But even in the very first version, the article not only asserted notability through exhibitions, but proved it sufficiently to pass WP:AFD: A "solo museum exhibition at the Tang Center and was included in the 1991 Whitney Biennial" together with the multiple good RS references there was almost certainly sufficient to meet the requirements. The additional information provided since shows clear and undoubted notability.

many of your speedies are good, and I want to encourage you to continue patrolling, but you are going too fast, as easily possible with Huggle. Consider the desirability of using WP:PROD if the article might be fixable or is in process of construction and has any potential promise at all . DGG (talk) 22:26, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

From: Michael

Please delete Whit Hertford and make it redirect to Whitby Hertford.

MHLU (talk) 15:46, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestionis is spelled suggestions. No I.

MHLU (talk) 23:16, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BigHairRef. Something happened:

Someone edited just today, just as I logged in, edited [that I have a penis.] I like it reverted. If I see he edited again, I will ask for revertion on my talk page.

It is not funny. It's serious. He might get fired.

Thanks, MHLU (talk) 01:48, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, BigHairRef! Both your user page and your user talk page has both been vandalized. You may wish to read the IP's talk page.

MHLU (talk) 13:51, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Read your your nomination for being an adminstrator!

AHLU (talk) 21:44, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, would you like to be a sysop someday?

AHLU (talk)

		The VG Barnstar
		You have earned this award for improving video game articles. AHLU (talk) 17:52, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi BigHairRef, how do you even have BigHairRef | Talk instead of BigHairRef (talk)? I really want to know that. AHLU (talk) 18:09, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you upload a picture to this article: Brazil–Hungary relations ? Thanks your hardship! --Tamás Kádár (talk) 16:03, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please upload a picture to this article: Hungary–Sri Lanka relations --Tamás Kádár (talk) 17:13, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed your improperly-placed {{prod}} tag from the Sequoyah High School (Claremore, Oklahoma) article. It has long been established by precedent that articles about American public high schools are inherently notable. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 00:32, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:SCHOOL. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 00:37, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

All you'll do is end up with an AfD discussion where everyone will tell you that high schools are notable by long-established precedent. Check some AfD archives and you'll see. I know there's a page aside from WP:SCHOOL that sets this out, but I can't find it right now. But trust me on this, because I've been down this road myself and learned the hard way. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 00:49, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been paged because a user has reported a high level of vandalism and you are listed as a contact.

This is an automatically generated message. If problems occur, please contact User:nathanww. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The King's a-poopin' (talk • contribs) 12:27, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The VG Barnstar
		For your work on the British Academy Video Games Awards articles, and to encourage you towards creating the other three. X201 (talk) 19:34, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you need any help with them, just let me know. - X201 (talk) 19:34, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

listen. Miss snit. I dont care what u and anyone else thinks so please leave me be. 173.55.170.16 (talk) 01:09, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What does Template:Vandalism information do? --Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 06:47, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On March 23, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 5th British Academy Video Games Awards, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royalbroil 02:28, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On March 24, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 4th British Academy Video Games Awards, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:47, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 March, 2009, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Houphouët-Boigny Arena stampede, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 12:20, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for supporting the Oxford bid to hold Wikimania 2010! We're currently in the final stages of the bid process - the jury will be announcing their decision by the 16th April. We're currently putting together the local team for the bid (who will do what if the bid wins); if you're able to be on the local team, please put your name in the appropriate place on m:Wikimania 2010/Bids/Oxford/Team. We'd also welcome anything you can do to help refine the bid in these last few days. If you have any questions, please let me or User:Seddon know. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:51, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:VideoJug Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:26, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:VideoJug Screenshot.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:26, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in the recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:

• Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
• Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

—WikiProject Video games (delivery by xenobot 03:21, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Admin Coaching has been removed from the request list. This is because you have not visited the page for at least 6 months (or your account has been inactive for at least 4 months). You are welcome to re-submit a request should you wish to, but please note that you are expected to regularly check the page (and to update the "last visited" field of your request). If you do re-submit, please carefully re-read the instructions for submission as they may have changed since you last visited! If you no longer require admin coaching, I hope that you continue to enjoy editing Wikipedia! Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 09:18, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear BigHairRef,

You are receiving this message because either [[Category:WikiProject Video games members]] or {{User WPVG}} is somewhere in your userspace, and you are currently listed in the "Unknown" section on the project's member list.

The member list is meant to provide a clearer picture of active membership. It is recommended that you update your status if you plan to regularly:

• Edit video game-related pages in the Article namespace
• Participate in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Members listed in the "Unknown" section will be removed from the membership list and category at the end of January 2010. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

Sincerely, the Video Games WikiProject (delivery by xenobot 21:42, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BigHairRef! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 317 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Mark Steele - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:06, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Harry and Ruth Final Spooks Episode.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:09, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.

You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:10, 30 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Harry and Ruth Final Spooks Episode.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:01, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Spooks Final.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:02, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About those edit,why are you deleting them,It was not a test?74.178.172.143 (talk) 20:14, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get it,I was just telling about what they were based on.74.178.172.143 (talk) 20:23, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Would you be interested in attending one of the next wikimeets in the north of England? They will take place in:

• Leeds on 12th April 2015
• Manchester on 26th April 2015
• Liverpool on 24th May 2015

If you can make them, please sign up on the relevant wikimeet page!

If you want to receive future notifications about these wikimeets, then please add your name to the notification list (or remove it if you're already on the list and you don't want to receive future notifications!)

Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:06, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox British Academy video games awards has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox award. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 12:45, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]