User talk:Dantheanimator

Would you mind avoiding {{conv}} and writing {{convert}} instead. The saving in the amount of typing is inconsequential so conv has no benefit. The downside is that it causes confusion for other editors who know what convert is (or at least, could guess), but who may not know what conv is. There are over 3.2 million {{convert}} templates in articles but hardly any {{conv}}. A complication is that {{cvt}} is a useful abbreviation for convert and cvt has an extra property, namely that it sets |abbr=on so unit symbols are shown, not names. Some editors assume {{conv}} does the same, but it doesn't. Johnuniq (talk) 04:04, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Johnuniq: thanks for the message! :) I didn't realize {{conv}} was undesirable so many thanks for letting me know (and for switching it out in my past article creations too). I'll make sure to stick with the {{convert}} template (or {{cvt}} when appropriate) instead and sorry for the mistake in the first place. Cheers, Dan the Animator 22:44, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dantheanimator, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Hey man im josh (talk) 16:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article NAFO (group) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DocZach -- DocZach (talk) 04:41, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article NAFO (group) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:NAFO (group) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DocZach -- DocZach (talk) 05:01, 7 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 25th Airborne Brigade (Ukraine), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hvardiiske.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have recently updated and expanded the article on the Lady R incident as your banner requested. Thank you for doing that. I think it adds a lot to the article and I needed the prompted to get onto it. Please take a look at the article to see if the banner requesting the article expansion is still needed. Discott (talk) 14:26, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks @Discott: for adding in the background! :) I've done some minor reorganizing so that it flows better (and doesn't feel too excessively sectioned) but the background itself is great! In case you're interested in further improving the article, I'd recommend rewording and expanding the lead to fully/better cover the content in the Background, "2023 accusation...", and Inquiry findings sections. If it helps, some questions to consider that the lead should be able to answer: what was South Africa's de jure & de facto position on the Russian invasion at the time of the incident (e.g. the docking was controversial because South Africa had publicly declared its "neutrality" to the invasion so the alleged arms transfer would've violated this "neutrality")? How were Russia-South Africa relations prior to the incident (briefly mention ANC/Vekselberg)? Briefly mention other causes for US-South Africa tensions (e.g. Mosi II exercises) and some more specific domestic reactions by South African officials/journalists (briefly). Briefly mention Russian and Ukraine reactions and mention the inquiry and what it found and reactions to the findings of the inquiry. Aside from that, I think once the lead is expanded this article'll be ready for a GAN. Many thanks for improving it and feel free to reach out if you want any additional prompts/guidance with it. Cheers, Dan the Animator 21:05, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - I just finished off the copy editing of Jamie Doran as part of the GOCE drive; you did most of the work and should claim credit for the effort on the drive page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Guild_of_Copy_Editors/Backlog_elimination_drives Chaiten1 (talk) 22:36, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Chaiten1! :) I think you improved the article more than me honestly so feel free to take credit for it. Cheers, Dan the Animator 21:09, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Minor Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to Dantheanimator for copy edits totaling between 1 and 3,999 words (including bonus and rollover words) during the GOCE March 2024 Backlog Elimination Drive. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Dhtwiki (talk) 08:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dhtwiki!!! :) Dan the Animator 02:05, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often perform minor edits while leaving an edit summary of mnr edit. Given that you also check the minor edit box (which leaves an m icon next to the edit summary), this is effectively the same as leaving no edit summary. While some editors—including myself (and likely you)—review changes by looking at the diff, some do so simply by reading the edit summary and likely find it annoying when the edit summary does not provide information about what or why the edit was performed (e.g. "/* Section */ changed url status to dead" or "/* Section */ url is dead", respectively). Thanks, and happy editing!

—Daℤyzzos (✉️ • 📤) 13:32, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @DaZyzzogetonsGotDaLastWord:, thanks for the message! About edit summaries, like you said, they're mostly to help other contributors review/give oversight to edits (although there are other reasons too ofc). I have usually used "mnr edit" and "mnr fix" for miscellaneous, quick edits that have essentially no need of review/oversight imo (some examples include removing excess whitespaces, adding in minor bits of markup/code to fix/improve previous edits, straightforward copyediting, adding in 1-2 links (if I add more, I'd usually say so), and standard content/text rearrangements (like putting stub templates on the bottom)). I also use it often when editing my user pages (which is completely legitimate per WP:USERPAGE) plus also occasionally when updating article talk page classifications/templates. That said, I've recently been adopting some more varied, specific edit summaries where it makes sense (like with copyediting, where I usually say "ce" and links additions with "+links"). Looking forward, I'll probably be limiting my use of the "mnr fix" edit summary for small, quick immediate followup corrections to previous edits given there's very little need to or practical other way of describing it (I don't think saying "added in hyphen with en-dash on Line 17" has any meaningful value over "mnr fix", for example). Feel free to let me know if there's anything else I can do to improve yk and thanks for everything! :) Dan the Animator 22:45, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"added hyphen [per [insert MOS wikilink here] (optional)]" or "added hyphen to fix [wikilinked problem]". Thank you for increacing the specificity of your edit summaries! – Daℤyzzos (✉️ • 📤) 20:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC) Please do not ping on reply. I will still be notified.[reply]

Welcome to the 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest, Dantheanimator! The contest is now open for submissions. List your work at your submissions page to earn points. If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

• Got open nominations? List them at review requests.
• Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews.
• Not sure if your article qualifies? See the guidelines for more information or contact a coordinator for verification.
• New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions about the contest on the talk page.
• Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open until 15 July, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you good luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Dantheanimator! The list you nominated, List of cities in Luhansk Oblast, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for a month, and we've already seen some momentous improvement in the quality of many articles about underrepresented subjects! So far, our top-scoring participants are:

• Magentic Manifestations (submissions) – 338 points, mainly from nine good articles. He's a contender for the "most submissions for a single country" specialty award, with nine submissions for India.
• Arconning (submissions) – 305 points, including from six seasonally-appropriate Olympics-related good articles.
• Generalissima (submissions) – 290 points, the bulk from her featured article about Greenlandic interpreter Qalaherriaq and two China-related good articles.
• AirshipJungleman29 (submissions) – 245 points, mostly from the achievement of bringing Genghis Khan to featured status.
• Thebiguglyalien (submissions) – 144 points from three good articles, including two about Kiribati elections, and four reviews of good article nominees.

Looking for ways to climb up the leaderboard yourself? Help out your fellow participants by answering a few review requests, particularly the older entries. Several more nominations needing attention are listed at eligible reviews, and highlighed entries receive a 1.5× multiplier! The coordinators would like to extend a special thanks to Thebiguglyalien (submissions) for his commitment to keeping these review pages up to date.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:24, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Dantheanimator! The list you nominated, List of cities in Donetsk Oblast, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Dantheanimator. I'm just posting to let you know that List of cities in Luhansk Oblast – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for September 9. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 21:23, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Kyiv Metro stations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Subway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Dantheanimator! The list you nominated, List of cities in Crimea, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Developing Countries WikiContest has now been running for two months, and we've seen tremendous improvement in the encyclopedic coverage of several underrepresented areas from a wide range of editors! The coordinators would like to highlght some of the newer faces who have been making notable contributions in the contest, including but by no means limited to:

• Arconning (submissions) – 386 points, with several good articles primarily relating to the Olympics
• Vigilantcosmicpenguin (submissions) – 141 points, who created multiple articles about abortion rights and laws in African countries
• TheNuggeteer (submissions) – 126 points, who has contributed to several articles associated with the Phillippines
• Jaguarnik (submissions) – 125 points, with several good article reviews and an appearance in the In the news section of the Main Page
• Averageuntitleduser (submissions) – 119 points, and has written about several Haitian topics and historical figures.

Only one month remains until the end of the contest, so it's time to make your remaining nominations! Please consider answering some review requests, particularly the older entries, as a way of helping out your fellow participants and moving up the leaderboard. Good luck!

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:00, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you're interested in Pre-Columbian history, would you possibly be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 21:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of oral repositories, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 8 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Dantheanimator, and thanks for your participation in the Developing Countries WikiContest. You recently made a large number of article submissions, some of which were done well beyond the seven-day window allowed for submissions by the contest rules. After discussing with another coordinator, I've decided to accept your submissions this once, assuming good faith in case you were unaware of that limitation. I'd ask that you review the rules carefully and make sure that future submissions are made on time, as we will not be able to provide that leniency again. Please let me or another coordinator know if you have any questions. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 23:04, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TechnoSquirrel69! :) Thanks for the message and sorry about the mistake! I completely didn't know about the individual seven-day windows (which is completely my fault... sorry!!) so I thought since the contest submission phase would close at the end of September, it wouldn't be an issue to submit them later all at once. That said, if it helps, I'm okay with the nominations being rejected too. I would've done the FLNs regardless of the contest and still will be doing them for quiet a while so its alright with me tbh. I'll definitely make sure to be more careful in the future contests (also hopefully will get some GAs next time around). In any case tho, many thanks to you and the other coordinators for organizing DCWC, it's been really helpful and quiet fun too! ;) Dan the Animator 23:37, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dantheanimator, I hope to encourage you to collect all the research you have scattered around the lists about Russian administration and collate it somewhere. The obvious place is likely Russian temporary administrative agencies in occupied Ukraine, a very poor article which has very little information about the administration, that provides far less insight than your tucked away footnotes. It's an important topic that can be tricky to cover, and the Kherson summary is well written. I have a memory of Russia also adjusting their borders for either Donestk or Luhansk by shuffling some raions around but can't find exactly what that was right now. The article could probably use something about passportisation, although that's a separate topic from local administrative boundaries.

Also saw your conversation above, I too was completely unaware of the seven day rule until a couple days ago. Seems odd! CMD (talk) 07:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for the post and FLN review CMD! :) About Russian occupation administrations, I agree with consolidating the content into the article you linked though I wouldn't say its all my research. In the case of the Kherson note, I got most of that info & the sources from the Russian occupation of Kherson Oblast article, which is quiet good with its coverage imo. Some of the other Russian occupation articles also aren't too terrible with the coverage too. About the temporary agencies article you linked, I'll definitely take a shot at it after I finish my current projects (right now I've been trying to make some headway with lists for Ukraine's villages and occasionally with some other lists).

In my experience, a lot of relevant content is already on wiki but scattered across articles like you said and also among different languages. About Donetsk & Luhansk, I did a quick on-wiki search and for Luhansk I found some info here (under Административно-территориальное устройство) which might be what you're thinking of? Also recommend checking the Russian language LPR and DPR articles if you're particularly curious about those two oblasts' occupation subdivisions (Google Chrome's translate feature does a solid translation of the content imo). Content about passportization is probably better placed in Passportization for now since that article's very stub-ish tho a short bit about how local community resources/administrative structures are used to facilitate/promote passportization/Russification in the occupied territories makes sense. A lot of the issue with expanding articles about occupation administrations is the difficulty in accessing some of the sources: I remember when I worked on List of cities in Crimea, which I plan on working on more to add additional details with more footnotes, some occupation websites were only available through Wayback Machine or just not available at all (like sev.gov.ru, which based on the error message I assumed had restricted access to American IPs). Then there's also the issue of having PDF files instead of webpages, which makes it a lot tougher to translate and use the content.

Although not exactly your expertise, I think this might be something you might be interested/could help with HappyWith? I remember you working on articles about Ukrainian subdivisions and topics on occupied territories and having a lot of knowledge about post-invasion happenings so thought you might be interested (also I know it's been a long while so hope all's well :) Dan the Animator 06:58, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I have a memory of some border change, perhaps a raion changing or villages moving to a new raion. I tried another round of fruitless searching, so who knows, I could be making it up. I wouldn't not put passportization information in that article, but it seems a key part of administration, mentioned in the more detailed news reports (eg).

For PDFs I highly recommend just screenshotting them and dumping those screenshots into an image to text site. I believe generative AI sites have such features built in too, although you may need a paid version to do it multiple times there. I was having a look at your Odesa nomination as well, but my comments were much the same as Kherson so I decided not to duplicate them. CMD (talk) 14:08, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, it doesn't sound too far fetched. Maybe this is similar to the Russian occupation officials moving the capital to Henichesk where they'll say it briefly and then quickly walk back on it. In any case, hope the articles I linked were helpful. About passportization, seems you're right. Don't have an economist subscription unfortunately so didn't read the full article but the preview is great. And thanks for the suggestion! I think I'll try it out. About the Odesa nom, no worries. I'd recommend waiting until I resolve your suggestions on the Kherson nom (which I'll apply to the other lists including Odesa too) and then, if you want, you could add your support (although reviews are more helpful, its perfectably acceptable and still helpful to get a simple one-line support with no suggestions). I'll send a ping on the Kherson nom when its ready. Thanks, Dan the Animator 15:23, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I want to make a comment on the inclusion of Kyiv in the List of cities in Kyiv Oblast. While I see why Kyiv should be mentioned (it's the administrative centre after all), it is technically not a part of Kyiv Oblast so I think it shouldn't be on the list itself (in its current state, the page implies that Kyiv is a part of Kyiv Oblast, just not a part of any raion). This situation is not equivalent to Sevastopol in Crimea as the List of cities in Crimea lists the cities in, well, Crimea (the Crimean Peninsula - a geographic region, not an administrative division), a concept that covers the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and Sevastopol. Meanwhile Kyiv Oblast is exclusively an administrative division, not a geographic region like the page suggests ("the city of Kyiv... is the most populous city in the geographic area"). Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 11:32, 27 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Shwabb1, thanks for bringing this up! The Kyiv Oblast list is definitely in need of a lot of work and the lead/rest of the article is far from ready (content about Chernobyl/Pripyat/Slavutych still needs to be added/vetted and, as you brought up, lots of rewording/reworking is needed to explain the relationship between Kyiv and Kyiv Oblast). I did some relatively quick edits to the article to make it more clear (including in the table, where Kyiv stands out from the rest now) but I'll be working on it more eventually! I've been somewhat procrastinating from this list since this and the List of cities in Ukraine both are in need of a lot more background research and content generation than the other lists but I'll make sure to get around to it eventually! :) Feel free to make any rewording/additions/other edits that you think would help in the meantime tho. Thanks, Dan the Animator 05:53, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah no worries, no need to rush when you're working on so many things at once. Even this quick fix I think makes a difference, so thank you. Shwabb1 ⟨taco⟩ 12:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest has come to a close! After a thrilling finish to the event with a slew of submissions on the final day, we have our winners. With 608 points, Thebiguglyalien (submissions) comes in third with his series of Kiribati and Botswanan submissions; BeanieFan11 (submissions) flies into second place at the last second with 771 points after a string of good articles about sportspersons; and after leading for much of contest's three months, Generalissima (submissions) finishes with a whopping 798 points to take home the Gold Belt Buckle. Congratulations to our winners!

In addition to his spot in the top three, BeanieFan11 (submissions) also wins the special awards for submitting under the most countries (44 countries) and for writing the most articles about women (15 Did you know? nominations)! Magentic Manifestations (submissions), after making 16 submissions under the Indian flag—15 of them good articles—receives the awards for most submissions for a single country and most featured or good articles promoted. For their submission of one FAC review, five FLC reviews, and 20 GAN reviews, Simongraham (submissions) wins for most article reviews.

The results of the contest have far exceeded any expectations the coordinators had for it at the beginning: among the submissions to the event were 3 FAs, 10 FLs, 88 GAs, dozens of article reviews of every kind, and more Did you know? submissions than we can count! Regardless of your level of participation, every contestant can be proud to have contributed towards a major step in countering the systemic bias on Wikipedia. Every year, millions of readers and editors around the globe use Wikipedia to educate themselves and communicate with others about parts of the world that often receive less attention than they deserve. Thank you for participating with us in the contest and contributing to this effort. The DCWC will return next year and we look forward to seeing you contribute again! However, before that...

We need your feedback! Join the conversation on the talk page to discuss your reflections on the contest (even if you didn't participate!) and help us make it better.

If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 19:02, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Anti-Systemic Bias Barnstar
		Thank you for participating in the Developing Countries WikiContest! You've received 145 points, and here's a special award for your contributions.

... sawyer * he/they * talk 19:17, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! :) Dan the Animator 19:42, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2018 in Andorra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is almost completely devoid of content. No indication of importance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 10:14, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, Dantheanimator! The list you nominated, List of cities in Odesa Oblast, has been promoted to featured status, recognizing it as one of the best lists on Wikipedia. The nomination discussion has been archived.

This is a rare accomplishment and you should be proud. If you would like, you may nominate it to appear on the Main page as Today's featured list. Keep up the great work! Cheers, PresN (talk) via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]