User talk:Jiangyu911

Hello, Jiangyu911! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! —HXL's Roundtable and Record 14:32, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply] Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hallo Jiang, Ich kom aus Nord-Westerliche Europa. WELKOM AM WWW! I have read some things like China doesnt have internet because they dont like joogle. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.11.134.217 (talk) 20:10, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of twin towns and sister cities in China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gumi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have a developed opinion yet on the move but, should there be support, I wondered whether it might be applicable to disambiguate from the proposed Xigazê (prefecture-level city) with something like Xigazê (district). In this case Xigazê could redirect to either title. Its just a thought but I didn't want to disrupt the proposal with a possible technicality. GregKaye 08:09, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

谁会把中华圣公会叫做中华。。 只是巧合，不要激动好不好 还有我是山西太原的。 dennis97519 (talk) 14:48, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

你能说清楚你为啥要撤销修改吗。。。我看不懂你英文说的啥，这边回复一下好不好。。。dennis97519 (talk) 15:30, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

中华香烟，可以说“来条中华”什么的
中华车，“那边开来一辆中华”
中华铅笔，“这是一支中华（型号）”
如果你觉得人们不会那么叫那为什么又要加回去呢？
请读一下 WP:PTM

dennis97519 (talk) 16:13, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• 这样好吧，把台湾的内容加回来，你删掉的圣公会什么的就不要了，铅笔汽车烟也都留下。我想台湾的中华电信比朝鲜的什么郡要更适合放在这里吧。Jiangyu911 (talk) 19:19, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Zhonghua may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *[[Chung-Hua Institution for Economic Research]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:31, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've wanted to inform you that even though like you said it's in Sichuan Province, the references as well as the article states that it is a Special Administrative Region. Therefore, the template had to be added to the article. And Woking had to be added to the template. Even though its structure is different from the other two SARs, according to the provided references, it's still a SAR. Thanks. Seqqis (talk) 08:51, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1. Hello, Seqqis. Yes you are right. The Wolong SAR is a SAR. But not a province-level SAR, so not belong to the province-level divisions of the PRC. It is de facto a county-level division of the Sichuan province. So, unter no occasion should it be added to the template of province-level divisions of the PRC and therefor the template should NOT be added into the Wolong article. A possible way, if you insist, the county-level division template can be added into the article . If you want, i can give you thousands of references to show how many rovince-level divisions of the PRC there are, in English and in Chinese. IN no official documents the Wolong SAR is seen as a province-level SAR, So, i repeat, you are right, it is still a SAR, but not a province-level SAR. Jiangyu911 (talk) 15:31, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada has a standing practice that we add a Canadian topic's name in French to the infobox only if that form is actually different than the name's form in English (e.g. Montreal vs. Montréal, Greater Sudbury vs. Grand-Sudbury, British Columbia vs. Colombie-Britannique.) There's no value in adding a French name to the infobox as secondary information if that name is spelled the same way as in English (such as "Canada", "Toronto", "Gatineau" or "Ottawa".) Bearcat (talk) 15:31, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. IJA (talk) 16:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can assure you that the Dongsha, Nansha and Xisha islands all fall under the jurisdiction of Hainan alone. Confusion over Guangdong may have arisen as Hainan only became a separate province in 1988. Any mention of control by Guandong is spurious and should be removed.  Philg88 ^♦talk 09:20, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

聽說您最近在Template:Country data China開始討論西藏旗的問題。你有可能會感興趣另外一個有問題的條目：Türkvizyon Song Contest。請看看這條目上所謂的“新疆國旗”——很久以前我把這個改成中國國旗，可是有個人在那裡偏偏就要用那個藍色半月旗。上次的討論沒有出任何效果，不知道你有沒有什麼想法。 --benlisquare_T•C•E 11:31, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dingyuan Railway Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dingyuan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you seem like a person that has some insight into Chinese history. I have seen this article Cho La incident and I find it very biased and it seems unauthentic. The sources are largely Indian, and I could not find any neutral sources for this article. The casualty count and results also seems very odd. Do you have any insight into this matter? I suspect it may be a propaganda article made by nationalistic Indians who felt disappointed after their loss in the Sino-Indian War Greentea555 (talk) 08:38, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. JQTriple7 ^talk 07:36, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The edit you made on 16:21, 25 Dec 2015 UTC+8 upon Template:Urban rail transit in China has been reverted due to the divergence of opinion regarding the grouping of items of the operational urban systems. Please join the discussion in Template talk:Urban rail transit in China to decide this matter over consensus before further edit. Yours truly, SilAshkenazi (talk) 02:22, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating Template:Hainan Eastern and Western Ring High-Speed Railway!!!! That "next station" template at the bottom of articles drives me crazy. It is nice to see the stations all presented in each station article. Good job! Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:29, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making edits where all you are doing is changing correct romanisation to incorrect! Thank you! 2Q (talk) 19:29, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Spring Airlines destinations

added links pointing to Ibaraki, Qianjiang, Jeju and Takamatsu

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, could you please stop adding "United States" the to end of the U.S. place name in the ADF article? It goes against convention on English Wikipedia, per WP:USPLACE. Please see the first sentence: "Articles on populated places in the United States are typically titled [[Placename, State]] or [[Placename, Territory]] (the 'comma convention')." Further disambiguation is only needed if the place name is ambiguous, which in this case it clearly is not. Thanks, Brycehughes (talk) 04:00, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,@Brycehughes. I totally can not agree with you. I see your claim and totally understand what you are talking about.But please read the first sentence of WP:USPLACE, "This page describes conventions for determining the titles of Wikipedia articles on places and for the use of place names in Wikipedia articles." In our case, it is not about the titles of articles, it is to describe a place. Arkansas is just a name of a US state, and it is not that well-known than the country. Not everyone knows that its a US-state, so we should let the reader know it's located in the United States. Otherwise you can post this issue to the talk page to let the community decide if we add "United States" or not. Thanks. Jiangyu911 (talk)

Oh, come on! I don't mean to be rude, but please read more carefully. "This page describes conventions for determining the titles of Wikipedia articles on places and for the use of place names in Wikipedia articles." You are in the wrong. Please stop adding "United States" the to end of the U.S. place name unless the name is ambiguous, which in this case it is not. Brycehughes (talk) 04:28, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. You are right, Sorry, i made a mistake in the previous argument, no offensive to you in person. I am not sure if i understand you and the WP:USPLACE right, can the word "United States" not be use, when a place is not ambiguous. When should the words "United States" be used at all? As far as i see, even in the examples here, in the articles of Elgin, Lancaster County, South Carolina and Elgin, Kershaw County, South Carolina. It is said they are in XXX, XXX, United States in the first sentences each. As well as in Arkadelphia, Arkansas, which in this case it clearly is not ambiguous. I personally, find this is kind of, let's say, American exceptionalism, after all, not all readers of Wikipedia know the name of all US-states. But, as a user of English Wikipedia, I do not want to be rude, I will obey the rules and will not against you in this issue. So, if you insist to remove "United States" from the placename without ambiguous in English-Wikipedia, you have a lot of work to do, good luck and best regards from China. Jiangyu911 (talk) 06:46, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to remove it from every article, because I don't care that much. But let's not go around incorrectly adding it. Brycehughes (talk) 14:01, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Brycehughes I'm looking at the dab ADF and agree with Jiangyu911 about including "US". Why is the US different to Turkey?! Can you explain the logical leap from article titles in WP:USPLACE to dab pages e.g. WP:MOSDAB / MOS:DABPLACES. Article titles are not the same as disambiguation. Detailing the country in a dab page seems useful to me? BTW, if you two agree, suggest we move this discussion to the dab talk Talk:ADF. Widefox; talk 09:49, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can't begin to describe how uninterested I am in this discussion. Do as you think best. Brycehughes (talk) 18:09, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Madang Road Station, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Huangpu District. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 14 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would you like to provide your input at this discussion regarding references and the Airlines and destinations tables? Thank you! — Sunnya343✈ (háblame • my work) 22:48, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jiangyu911. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jiangyu911. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have recently created a draft about Abao, the Chinese folk singer from Shanxi https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Abao . I was wondering if you could help add some more references or any other information to this draft. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Canton japan (talk • contribs) 09:13, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jiangyu911. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Stations on the Lanzhou–Xinjiang High-Speed Railway requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:21, 19 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]