User talk:Lightspecs

Hi Lightspecs! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:12, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

I also considered separating Rouse the Believers from Salvation Gov, though couldn't find a source claiming they are separate so maybe it is a part of it after all. I do know however that Turkistan Islamic Party is a part of the salvation gov along with HTS, so it's not just HTS in it. A4516416 (talk) 08:46, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No group is really "part" of the SSG. It's not like the Interim Government where they have a "Ministry of Defence" and a self-proclaimed "army". The SSG is basically the political wing of HTS and only HTS. The TIP are close military allies of HTS but they don't participate in its "government". Lightspecs (talk) 09:01, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Lightspecs,

Thank you for creating 2019 Turkish offensive into north-eastern Syria.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

As I have said, we cannot put the Turkish claims as fact, anywhere.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Slatersteven}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Slatersteven (talk) 10:44, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lightspecs, thanks for leaving a message on my Talk page. I agree on your revert regarding the this edit, as I think I confused that article with this one (basically who is attacking and who is being attacked). My edit in the Tell Hamis page mentioning the clock square could have been fixed with a minor edit, rather than a revert. You also reverted my Tel Abyad edit, which is well sourced and citing an author that Kurds use all the time to support their claims (more or less pro-Kurdish). Can you explain your point? Thanks, Amr ibn Kulthoumعمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 02:34, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Liberation" is POV unless it's named as such by the majority of reliable sources (ex. Liberation of Paris). There's also no reason to remove the Kurdish names of settlements when they're Kurdish minorities in them. Lightspecs (talk) 09:05, 16 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Changed "Liberation" in Tell Abyad to capture, although SDF and their supporters here use the word "Liberation" all the time. As for language, the presence of less than 10% Kurdish minority in the city does not warrant inventing a new name for it. I have left it however to show my good faith, although I am not convinced. Cheers, Amr ibn Kulthoumعمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 03:44, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I’ve noticed that you’ve changed the article on February 2020 Balyun Airstrike into a redirect due to a lack of distinctness. I don’t believe that is the case, as the article is much more notable by than the other airstrikes, to a point where it has received specific coverage from multiple organizations, and has provoked quite the “upset” response from the Turkish government. I’d say it’s probably notable enough for its own article. There should probably be a discussion before the article is removed Serafart (talk) (contributions) 05:16, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 23rd Division (Syrian rebel group), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afrin. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Cabayi (talk) 19:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello my friend , All the sources cites American officials saying about the ETIM " there's "no credible evidence" that it still exists" , check it here as an example https://www.dw.com/en/us-removes-separatist-group-condemned-by-china-from-terror-list/a-55527586 , so technically the U.S. can't be an opponent to what it deems to be " non existing " , so your respected example about Taliban isn't valid since America still believe that Taliban does exist , Thank YouAleviQizilbash (talk) 11:42, 8 November 2020 (UTC) Lightspecs Wikipedia's lists of allies and opponents to any group doesn't mean that what the group itself deems to be an ally or an opponent but rather what other states and organizations classify the group , an example here is the Hezbollah list of allies and opponents https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hezbollah you will see that Japan , Canada , Morocco , Serbia are opponents to Hezbollah yet there is no credible source or evidence to show that Hezbollah regard them as opponents . I believe that this is the origin of the misunderstanding about the issue of opponents in the Eastern Turkistan article , so it's not about what the ETIM deem as opponent , it's the way around and America no longer believe that ETIM exists as the example here https://www.dw.com/en/us-removes-separatist-group-condemned-by-china-from-terror-list/a-55527586 so technically you can't remain an opponent to what you classified as " non existing " , hope this could clear up the misunderstanding my friend , Thank You AleviQizilbash (talk) 12:14, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, things have changed in Abu Mohammad al-Julani and so many information has been added and I don't know if It's right or wrong so you better check it out so that people can get the right information. Thanks Kiro Bassem (talk) 17:53, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2014_Jihadist_Insurgency_in_Iraq_and_Syria&redirect=no stop redirecting it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohammed12313893 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abu Omar al-Idlibi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abu Omar al-Idlibi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Usedtobecool ☎️ 14:11, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Lightspecs: How goes it? You seem to have a penchant using dodgy sourcing. I removed the facebook ref after I reviwed the page, as its the worst of the lot. It may be the official mouthpiece of the organisation but it is a primary sps source and its unacceptable as a source. Don't use it. There are still five reference. Ref 3, 8, 11, 14 are also really poor. I understand it is a very recent event and its quite hard to find decent sources, but there really isn't a need for it. I hope that helps. scope_creep^Talk 09:25, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I think you made a hasty decision in restoring the Kurdish contribution to the Battle of the Beaufort (1982). At least check out my reasoning at the article's talkpage. Jokkmokks-Goran (talk) 21:52, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How you do know they are not the same? SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 04:34, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The current IRI emerged in 2020 not as a group in itself but a brand^[1] or network^[2] of pro-Iran Shia armed groups in Iraq. There's no source indicating any links, spiritual or otherwise, between it and the Sunni group. Lightspecs (talk) 04:40, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]