User talk:Olivia Harry

Welcome!

Hello, Olivia Harry! Welcome to Wikipedia! You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! SkyWarrior 01:38, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

AfC notification: Draft:Hananya Naftali has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Hananya Naftali. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 09:39, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Theroadislong

Yes,I have seen to that. Thanks so much. Let's keep modifying the article gradually. Stay with me please. Olivia Harry (talk) 09:47, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: United States of Biafra (January 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:United States of Biafra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 23:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Olivia Harry! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 23:14, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KylieTastic

Thanks for giving me feedback on my submission. This is a current event and it will continue to develop on daily basis. I have provided more references. You may re-review. Olivia Harry (talk) 00:43, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 14:11, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olivia Harry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am appealing unblock of my account because I am not the user account in question. I just joined Wikipedia but when I wanted to join, my IP address was already blocked and I had to follow a procedure for an Editor (Wikipedia account creator) to help me create it. I strongly believe that my network, IP has been abused by unknown person. Olivia Harry (talk) 9:53 am, 11 January 2024, Thursday (19 days ago) (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Please describe concisely and clearly how your edits merited a block, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser data is not helpful in this case. --Yamla (talk) 15:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bbb23: Could you please provide any comments on the unblock request. Newyorkbrad (talk) 18:46, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The user's unblock request is not credible. See here.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think they're on proxy.

Likely to FocusedDeal, though. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:56, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olivia Harry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I am unblock request for the second time. I found out and realized that my edits was disruptive according to Wikipedia rules as I didn't write the draft article, United States of Biafra with much numerous, independent sources. I am sincerely sorry for this error on my side. I have sat down and read all the Wikipedia guidelines on publishing article and promise never to repeat my mistakes again. I'm new user and I am now aware of the rules, requlations, guiding Wikipedia and will always obey henceforth. Olivia Harry (talk) 21:29, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The discussion above, and the one Bbb23 links to, leave some questions unanswered about the sockpuppetry allegations. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:36, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.