Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Ian Jolly
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. per consensus and as a poorly sourced BLP per WP:BLP. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- David Ian Jolly (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. I am concerned about the ambiguous notability. I dream of horses (T) @ 03:56, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There's nothing in the article to establish notability; nor is there anything to meet BLP requirements of a new article. The sole "reference" describes the book (which it is selling) but says nothing about the author so cannot serve as an adequate BLP ref. AllyD (talk) 07:07, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable. Keristrasza (talk) 09:31, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No substantial coverage in reliable sources. Armbrust Talk Contribs 16:14, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not yet notable. Cullen328 (talk) 20:30, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.