Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josefino Cenizal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Don't usually close on one !vote but Everymorning has proven they meet ENT/MUSICBIO so obvious Keep here (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 01:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Josefino Cenizal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable WP:ENT Quis separabit? 00:10, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 02:40, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:33, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep There is a fair amount of reliable source coverage of Cenizal, enough, I think, to meet WP:MUSICBIO: [1] [2] [3] [4] Everymorning (talk) 11:11, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.