Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myfanwy Davies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Myfanwy Davies

The result was delete. Unanimous consensus for deletion. Further, the article in its present state reads like a press release; were the subject later becomes notable the article would still need to be re-written from scratch. -- llywrch (talk) 15:20, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Political candidate who fails WP:POLITICIAN, no other explanation of notability. Paste _{Let’s have a chat.} 18:22, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, per nom. The only claim of notability is having stood in an election, and that in itself does not confer notability. RichardOSmith (talk) 20:15, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable under our guideline for politicians. Article can be recreated if she is elected to a high office in the future. Cullen328 (talk) 21:19, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:06, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No independent third-party coverage other than routine pre-election reporting of candidates. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 08:22, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable as a politician. FruitMonkey (talk) 21:15, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Deleteas a candidate and fails WP:POLITICIAN. LibStar (talk) 06:58, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Snow Delete. Above reasons state the complete case. Agricola44 (talk) 15:40, 10 March 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per WP:POLITICIAN. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 20:36, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.