Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PADC Hummingbird

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete and add a line to the article at MBB Bo 105 if a source can be found. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 16:02, 13 January 2017 (UTC).[reply]

PADC Hummingbird

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources in article, and not likely to be notable on its own. If it's truly a development of the MBB Bo 105, then that article is probably the best place for a reliably sourced mention. BilCat (talk) 12:40, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge anything sourceable. Andy Dingley (talk) 13:04, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:24, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it clearly flew but as it was an illegal copy of the Bo 105 it just needs a line at MBB Bo 105#Variants rather than a stand-alone article. MilborneOne (talk) 22:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with MilborneOne just add a line to MBB Bo 105 Sario528 (talk) 13:27, 9 January 2017 (UTC)DISCUSSION[reply]

← Body of the discussion stays unchanged

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.