Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Council of Religious Communities and Groups

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:25, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

United Council of Religious Communities and Groups

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem notable. All Google Books searches seem trivial — I can find sources mentioning them in passing but nothing significant. Deprodded for no reason. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:38, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This was deprodded for a very good reason. WP:PROD is a procedure used for clear-cut uncontroversial deletion candidates, but your rationale was "not sure if notable." If the nominator himself is unsure then it obviously doesn't qualify. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:11, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:59, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This committee is apparently also known by its Russian acronym OSROG, for which there is coverage here, here, here, here, and here [1][2]. Gongshow ^Talk 00:30, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It would've helped if the article said that, but of course the creator always invests the absolute bare minimum into every article he makes. At least now I know I won't get a "Speedy keep, it clearly exists, nothing else matters". Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:48, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – This topic meets WP:GNG per [3], [4]. Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:09, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The sources mentioned by Gongshow and Northamerica1000 are quite enough to establish notability (as well as providing extra information, some of which I have now added to the article). PWilkinson (talk) 21:04, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.