Jump to content

Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 6

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< March 5
March 7 >

March 6

[edit]

Category:Perfect World (company)

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: withdrawn (non-admin closure) Marcocapelle (talk) 07:23, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I boldly moved the main article from Perfect World (company) to Perfect World Co., Ltd. per WP:NATURAL (see also WP:NCCORP). This might be a borderline WP:C2D but I’d like to err on the side of caution. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:34, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:YYYY Summer Olympics water polo templates

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Over-categorization with only one subcategory, and the subcategories are already well-navigated by Category:Olympics water polo squad navigational boxes. Frietjes (talk) 21:48, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:1877 establishments in Transvaal Colony

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename/merge/delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:42, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: 1877 is currently the only year within Category:Establishments in Transvaal Colony by year. The South African Republic (ZAR, also known as the Transvaal Republic) lasted from 1852 to 1902. In 1877 the British annexed the ZAR as the Transvaal, a British colony. However, the lead section of the article Transvaal Colony uses that name for period of direct British rule over a larger area between 1902 and 1910. It would be clearer to rename this 1877 category as part of ZAR history. – Fayenatic London 21:36, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Jurchen rulers

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 14#Category:Jurchen rulers

Category:Japanese Breakfast

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Unnecessary eponymous parent category for two interlinked subcategories per WP:OCEPON. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 21:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lists of women politicians

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: reverse merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:44, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Upmerge. Same category. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 21:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Environment of Los Angeles

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename & reparent. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:45, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: SoCal has a zillion fiddly little district/city/county borders which is fine but for ecosystem stuff like watersheds and air pollution it's not helpful. Anyway current title implies City of Los Angeles but I think we should go a bit bigger to be more inclusive; I think it's more helpful than "category:environment of Santa Monica" and category:environment of Riverside" etc. jengod (talk) 20:03, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Blues festivals in Estonia

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 14#Category:Blues festivals in Estonia

Category:Buildings and structures by monarch

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. This was a rather contentious discussion, but most people seem to be in favor of deletion. Aside from those who explicity !voted delete or listify, there were several comments arguing that the categories are ill-defined, possibly being WP:OCASSOC, and that not all of the listed articles mention a monarch in connection to the topic. Because of the ambiguity in scope, listification seems unlikely as well, so I have chosen deletion as the most satisfactory response. (non-admin closure) –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 17:06, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I think Neddyseagoon (talk · contribs) did better with naming the subcat Category:Building projects in Rome by instigator. Note that "building projects" would be inconsistent with the rest of Category:Buildings and structures, but IMHO seems fitting in this case. Some alternatives would be "by patron" or "by sponsor". – Fayenatic London 23:01, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
William Allen Simpson (talk) 10:22, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Looking at those, there is a problem: Lohaprasada was built by Dutugamunu, Lovamahapaya is simply "a building of this class". No mention of being built by Dutugamunu. The other two claim to be have been built by Dutugamunu. Is this a category likely to be expanded?
William Allen Simpson (talk) 19:00, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is only one other mentioned in the article. So delete Category:Buildings and structures completed in the reign of Dutugamunu, as the list is already a section of the article.
William Allen Simpson (talk) 19:13, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is an attempt to built a relevant tree, instead of just deleting them. Some will be pruned. Only those documented as government sponsored would qualify.
William Allen Simpson (talk) 18:50, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. What about the Arch of Hadrian (Athens)? It was built to suck up to the Emperor. It was commissioned by the government of Athens. Achaea, as a province of the empire, could be said to be a branch of the imperial government. Does that make the arch a government sponsored structure? Laurel Lodged (talk) 23:40, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: "by instigator" sounds awful, but both it and the alternatives in the original proposal are equally unsuitable, simply because the contents of these categories refer to buildings constructed, rebuilt, or completed during the reign (or equivalent thereof) of various individuals, irrespective of their contributions. I'm not saying that this is an invalid categorization; on the contrary, it's a very logical one. The issue is that none of the proposed titles is an accurate description of those contents. What about "by period"—less sweeping in scope than "by era", and the contents could still consist of structures dating from the reign of individual rulers, irrespective of whether they ordered them to be built or somehow participated in the construction. An alternative might be "by reign", although in a few cases that might be inappropriate ("by reign or period"?). Unless I'm forgetting, categories can have some text identifying what should and shouldn't go in them. P Aculeius (talk) 12:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I applaud everyone's efforts to try to figure out a way to keep this info as categories. But we're just dancing around the main issue. All these entries need explanation in regards to their relationship to said monarch. And that equals a list, not a category. See per point #2 at WP:CLN#Disadvantages of a category. - jc37 19:43, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep -- This is about ruling monarchs. Category names should be short, which sometimes measn that there are too terse, but the solution is often not to rename, but to define better in a headnote. BTW Arch of Hadrian (Athens) was presumably erected by the city of Athens, which was merely one city of the province and not its capital. Whether its was instigated (or commissioned) by Hadrian or merely in honour of him is a different question. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:23, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's not a different question; ot gets to the heart of this proposal. If we cannot tell if the arch was instigated (or commissioned) by Hadrian or merely in honour of him, then what is the point of this tree structure? Better to have an article list that could properly contextualise it. Laurel Lodged (talk) 08:44, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Fayenatic london, Marcocapelle, and P Aculeius: would delete with listify be acceptable?
William Allen Simpson (talk) 06:47, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have no objection. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:20, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Agree with the condition of being able to re-create the categories based on the contents of said lists. We have monarchs who are known for their building projects; for Justinian, an entire book was written to show the world what a great builder he was. It may have been exaggerated as part of imperial propaganda, but it is there, and it is a topic and categorization used by historians as well (just search for "Justinianic fortification" or "Justinianic building"). And if there is a list, then the buildings belonging to it could and should also be categorized by it. Constantine ✍ 08:16, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • That seems like a logical way to preserve the information and provide more context, so long as persons (whether monarchs or not) associated with their building (whether by involvement or merely contemporaneous reign) link to the appropriate list or section, perhaps with a "see also" line. P Aculeius (talk) 14:30, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 10:30, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:47, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Years in (the Kingdom of) Hungary

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 18:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Additional categories merged after closure under WP:G6:
– Fayenatic London 22:30, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


  • Propose merging:
more categories nominated
Nominator's rationale: merge, before 1848 it is too early to start year categories in Hungary, it merely leads to a huge set of single-article categories. This is well explainable by the fact that there was no sovereign Hungarian country between 1526 until at least 1848. The Habsburgs merely kept King of Hungary as part of their infinite list of titles but it did not have any practical meaning.
A number of nominations, especially in the 16th and 17th century, are without a second merge target because the article is already in a Habsburg or Ottoman year category as appropriate.
If the categories are kept, we should discuss a more consistent naming scheme. In the 16th and 17th century the term "Kingdom of Hungary" may be used for the strip of land (mostly modern Slovakia) that was ruled by the Habsburgs rather than by the Ottomans. But not all editors agree with or understand that nuance, see e.g. Category:1635 establishments in the Kingdom of Hungary with establishments in Budapest. Marcocapelle (talk) 17:19, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep some?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 18:26, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Members of the International Law Commission

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 14#Category:Members of the International Law Commission

Category:Sex worker organisations in Finland

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 14#Category:Sex worker organisations in Finland

Biographies by subject

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 14#Biographies by subject

Category:Compilations of biographies about artists

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 14#Category:Compilations of biographies about artists

Category:Communications units and formations of the Lithuanian Army

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:49, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. Estopedist1 (talk) 13:06, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:29, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Fictional females

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 14#Category:Fictional females

Category:Transracial activists

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 14#Category:Transracial activists

Category:Transracial people

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 March 14#Category:Transracial people

Category:Roman-era philosophers by origin or region

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Rename the sub-cat. Partial merge of Category:Roman-era philosophers by origin or region to Category:Ancient Roman philosophers, moving the other two sub-cats up; also add Arius there, as the other two Alexandrian philosophers are in a sibling Category:Roman-era Peripatetic philosophers. – Fayenatic London 09:16, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:OCLOCATION, WP:OVERLAPCAT, WP:SMALLCAT.
See also:
William Allen Simpson (talk) 17:04, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
added/tagged the following, per that discussion. - jc37 17:23, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
added to my nomination, fixed the tags. Leave the other two in the other discussion, we are smart enough to carry on parallel discussions.
William Allen Simpson (talk) 02:37, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Fine by me : ) - jc37 05:26, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:40, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 17:02, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Communist rulers

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 19:57, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: WP:ARBITRARYCAT, WP:OVERLAPCAT. Category:Rulers is currently a child of Category:Sovereignty suggesting that "rulers" are sovereign. Some are not rulers, they were elected. Most are in parallel related categories, not aid to navigation.
Well documented, long time precedent:
Separated from:
  1. Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 13#Category:Socialist rulers
  2. Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 February 14#Category:Fascist rulers
William Allen Simpson (talk) 04:43, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@JayCoop and Fayenatic london: participants in 2019 Speedy discussion.
William Allen Simpson (talk) 05:07, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@LaundryPizza03 and Justus Nussbaum: participants in 2022 discussion (who are still around).
William Allen Simpson (talk) 05:29, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 21:46, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PS: I've switched to Delete now because of the deletion of category:Socialist rulers. Cheers, Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 18:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
PPS: I'm now at Strong delete because of the deletion of category:Socialist rulers and category:Fascist rulers. Cheers, Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 20:58, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwerfjkltalk 16:58, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Russian fascism

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: combine.
Nominator's rationale: Russian fascism is a disambiguation page. Skovl (talk) 14:42, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Marcocapelle: not all articles in Category:Russian Fascist Party are specific to the Russian Fascist Party either. All-Russian Fascist Organisation was in the US. Various others were in Europe. But all save one article in Category:Russian fascism (1930s–1940s) is also in Category:Russian Fascist Party, so they are nearly duplicate. Therefore, I'll modified my !vote again; they should all merge into the renamed Category:Fascism in Russia.
William Allen Simpson (talk) 08:57, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
William Allen Simpson (talk) 08:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
William Allen Simpson (talk) 08:01, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Lithuanian neo-Nazis

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge to Category:Neo-Nazi politicians. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Latvian contemporary art

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: merge. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Per WP:SMALLCAT. This category has only 1 entry. Estopedist1 (talk) 13:17, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: rename. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:03, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is a follow up to an opposed C2E speedy renaming.
More generic category is needed. Only one such sidebar template is for external links: Template:Archival records, so there is no need for Category:External link sidebar templates just yet. Other template would be subcategorized from Category:Interwiki link templates into Category:Interwiki link sidebar templates. —⁠andrybak (talk) 13:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Ancient biography stubs

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:13, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Stub category and template recently created for just one person. As always, stub categories are not free for just anybody to create willy-nilly -- the required minimum before a stub category can be justified is 60 articles, and for that reason a stub category has to be approved by WikiProject stub sorting before it can be created. Since the one person here was Jewish, he can make do with {{Judaism-bio-stub}}, and doesn't need this if he's the only person in it. Bearcat (talk) 04:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Television series set in fictional locations

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: containerise. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:14, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: I'm not sure what exactly bothers me about this cat. Should it have 10,000 more articles, or none at all? Should this be a container cat? Is it significant that Roseanne is set in a fictional city (Category:Television series set in fictional locations) in an actual state (Category:Television shows set in Illinois)? Fuddle (talk) 04:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Biblical rulers by century

[edit]

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 April 15#Category:Biblical rulers by century

Category:Moving walkways

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy merge to Category:Land transport. – Fayenatic London 11:16, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: Only one article after 10 years. Fuddle (talk) 03:25, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:U.S. states with multiple time zones

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This isn't a defining attribute, it is trivia -- that could be in a list, but doesn't need a category. Walt Yoder (talk) 01:37, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 06:11, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Category:Moral communities

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete. (non-admin closure) Qwerfjkltalk 20:16, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nominator's rationale: This is just a bunch of religious organizations, even if purged it would ultimately would be a WP:SUBJECTIVECAT and currently duplicative with and more WP:DEFINING category - car chasm (talk) 00:41, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Nederlandse Leeuw (talk) 04:43, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2023_March_6&oldid=1157912092"