User talk:Multichill/Archives/2011/August

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hi there, the other day, I added a couple of items to Commons:Flickr batch uploading. It lists you as one of the participants. Given that past requests have often been responded to on the same day, but there's been no reply to my requests, I was wondering whether I've missed something / done something wrong. I've also posted this message to user Zil. I haven't watchlisted your page (so if you reply here, please notify me with a talkback), but I do monitor the upload request pages. Thanks a lot. Schwede66 01:23, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi again, one of my flickr batch upload jobs from early June is still open. Zil has had a few attempts, has asked a few times for me to do something, but since my last action (12 July) things have been silent. I see he or she hasn't been on Commons in a while. Would you mind having a look at some point? I know that we are all volunteers and hence I really appreciate you doing these kinds of jobs. I've now watchlisted your page, too, so a TB is not required. Schwede66 06:00, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Multichill, in 2008 hebben we de gelegenheid gehad om "Het groot domein" in Sint-Agatha-Rode in België tijdens een monumentendag te bezoeken. Ik heb toen foto's gemaakt van het kasteel, dat vanaf de straat niet zichtbaar is. Kan ik deze foto's op Commons uploaden? Groeten, Wouter (talk) 21:44, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Als aanvulling een ander geval. Als gunst van de eigenaar hebben we met een groepje de buitenkant van een grote privé woning kunnen bekijken. Ook een onroerend erfgoed geval. Ik heb daar ook foto's van gemaakt. Ik zou het zelf niet op prijs stellen als op die manier foto's van mijn huis bij Commons terecht komen. Is de privacy regel als bij personen hier ook van toepassing? Wouter (talk) 20:12, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Het is een beetje naar eigen inzicht of een foto een privacygevoelig karakter heeft. Als ik een eigenaar spreek, vraag ik meteen of hij het goedvindt dat ik een of enkele foto's op wikipedia plaats en ik geef uitleg over wikipedia. Soms wordt de goedkeuring geweigerd. --Havang(nl) (talk) 07:21, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Ik heb naar eigen inzicht een paar foto’s ge-upload en ik verwacht in deze gevallen geen problemen. Vragen om goedkeuring is soms moeilijk. Wie is beslissingsbevoegd? Tevens is men zeer huiverig om iets zwart op wit vast te leggen. Mondeling iets goedvinden voor fair-use zal geen probleem zijn. Maar als de foto’s worden gebruikt voor het commercieel verkopen van ansichtkaarten of het gebruik op posters met een uitgesproken politieke boodschap is wat anders. Wouter (talk) 21:12, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Flickr - …trialsanderrors - The hippopotamus, 1874.jpg is in the public domain, the licence section was changed accordingly. Please note that the description does not contain information on the digital enhancement or the source for the high resolution version. If you can provide this information feel free to add it. Thanks for taking care of this. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 01:58, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Flickr_-_…trialsanderrors_-_jabulani_014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

trialsanderrors (talk) 09:32, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Ddmstdm07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 03:23, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Flickr_-_moses_namkung_-_AFI.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Mn2150 (talk) 23:05, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Flickr_-_moses_namkung_-_AFI-5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Mn2150 (talk) 23:54, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Flickr_-_moses_namkung_-_Jens_Lekman_6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Mn2150 (talk) 00:11, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi! One question regarding Commons:Deletion_requests/Template:ITTF (deleted by you). So you don't deem the permission statement on the ITTF website as sufficient (bold quote in the first DR)?

example: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Liu_Guoliang.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 was from http://www.ittf.com/ittf_pictures/Photo_Enlarged.asp?ID=3972&

I am just asking because we still have several images relying on this permission sentence from the website itself. Also some on enwp. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 21:53, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Now here: Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Photos_from_ITTF - to get an answer :) --Saibo (Δ) 16:30, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Please see http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Batch_uploading/Geograph#Problem_with_geographic_categories

Both bots have related (but different) issues mainly related to adding lots of files to "town and village" categories - that is utlimately counterproductive - since the whole categories need to be cleaned (no easy way to tell which are right or wrong) - the problem is that both the bots make mistakes. Your bot's main problem is that it is adding many files to categories of which the files are already in subcategories eg Category:Hambleton has many files in which should not be there.

Here's the sort of thing your bot gets wrong - [1]

I'm suggesting that geograph bot either use maintenence categories, or a geographic method based on actual boundary data, or to stop until fixed.

I'm not sure how responsible your bot is - I've seen it make some mistakes but I think Geograpbot is making the most errors. Please respond on the linked page if your bot is part of the problem. Imgaril (talk) 19:51, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Clarify

this recent edit http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AMalvern_Crescent%2C_Hull_-_geograph.org.uk_-_543805.jpg&action=historysubmit&diff=57602064&oldid=49299946 - the locations it added are wrong - this happens a lot. Please stop the bot adding this. Imgaril (talk) 20:09, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Bot stop request

I've requested that the bots (Geograph, and MultichillBot) be stopped until the junking of geographical articles is fixed/addressed/stopped. Please see Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#User:BotMultichillT.Imgaril (talk) 17:03, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi it's just a polite note i noticed a couple of images you said you were finding a better category for, clearly images for somewhere in Surrey, yet you added Walton, Liverpool, category, to this. Also you did the same for Everton somewhere in Bedfordshire, to Everton, in Liverpool (Like the football club). I'm not sure why? Have had to remove these images from Walton, Liverpool & Everton, Liverpool Babydoll0409 (talk) 11:20, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

I've actually noticed your name appearing on a few re-categorised images which are recategorised incorrectly. All these are from the Liverpool area. Can you please refrain from doing this? Babydoll0409 (talk) 11:32, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Please can you stop recategorising uncategorised images relating to Liverpool as West Derby or Walton can you not just simply categorise them as Liverpool? I would appreciate a response as your edits are still happeningBabydoll0409 (talk) 14:17, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi,

I saw that your bot took all the pictures from our Flickr stream - that's great! But he mix all into one category, not into sets like flickr, not into the right category ("Images from Wikimania 2011 organization team) and without the Template:Wikimania2011-License... Can anything can be done to change that? --Itzike (talk) 18:25, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi Itzike, is that tracker category and {{Wikimania2011-License}} really needed? People will just sort out the category I guess. Upload is very slow at the moment so I rather not kill it. I created Commons:Flickr batch uploading/Wikimania 2011 so that we can easily get a lot of Wikimania 2011 to Commons. Multichill (talk) 19:05, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

---

Hello, Multichill/Archives/2011!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 14:49, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

• Image:WEEKNUMMER332-HRE0000DF9D.ogv was uncategorized on 9 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 14:49, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

File:US_Army_51721_Military_women_inspire_photographer's_art,_life.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 08:53, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

File:US_Army_52187_BreastCancer_.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 08:58, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

File:US_Army_52500_Reid_3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 09:03, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

File:US_Army_53143_Sparky_the_Fire_Dog^reg,_game_.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

High Contrast (talk) 09:15, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Darth Vader - geograph.org.uk - 1379636.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

--ANDROBETA 20:03, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

respected friend I have lot of information about Gilgit-Baltistan which is a dispute territory between India and Pakistan being belong from the dispute area I want to add some United Nation and Pakistan/India agreements about my home land but I can not speak/write English. Therefore I am requesting you to help and guide me for improving my English. best wishes. Shakeelgilgity

I'm afraid I can't help you. You might want to try Commons:Help desk. Multichill (talk) 22:33, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

I haven't been able to get the http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/Gallery.php?wikifam=commons.wikimedia.org&img_user_text=BotMultichillT to work to see the US Navy photos recently. Is this a known error or just something on my part? Rmhermen (talk) 18:42, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes, a meeting is now being planned. At last!Blofeld Dr. (talk) 13:04, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Europeana_logo_3_eu_black.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

– Adrignola talk 18:51, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

File:ORP_Orzel(1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Kekator (talk) 03:08, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

With all due respect, why do you keep putting images for Walton, Surrey, in to Walton, Liverpool, and similarly put numerous images in the Liverpool area in to the wrong location? I have already contacted you and you have ignored my comments. I would appreciate a reply Babydoll0409 (talk) 10:09, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Is it possible to edit the title of this image? I am the artist in this photograph, and I am from Oxnard, California - not from El Paso, Texas. A fix to the title would be appreciated! Thanks!

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US_Navy_040527-N-7871M-071_Electronics_Technician_3rd_Class_Juan_Solorzano_of_El_Paso,_Texas,_works_from_photographs_to_paint_a_mural_depicting_various_scenes_of_USS_George_Washington_(CVN_73)_.jpg

--Jsolorzanoarts (talk) 16:20, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

•  Done. Multichill (talk) 22:14, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it,if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 03:37, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it,if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 03:39, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it,if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 03:40, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

CAN YOU STOP UNVIELING IMAGES HERE THERE AND EVERYWHERE TO CATEGORIES THAT DO NOT BELONG TO THE IMAGES YOU ARE IDENTIFYING. Image for "View South along Berry Street from the corner of Bold Place" in Liverpool is in Liverpool city centre and you added Toxteth and Dingle "IRELAND" on some kind of assumption basis. Please if you have to can you just add Liverpool? Only you are also pulling up files that are nothing to do with Liverpool. I realise this is known as a bot but you are the controller you need to look at this. You are being very ignorant in not responding to my earlier messages. Can you figure away around this as your edits are becoming quite a pest. Babydoll0409 (talk) 20:42, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for you message. As you can see my talk page has become a random dumping ground so I sometimes miss messages. I'll have a look at it. Multichill (talk) 22:01, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi - just drop a quick comment on this:

The Dingle error is the result of a disambiguation error.

However, Toxteth is result of the inadequacy of the underlying databases: Neither have a distinct location for "the city centre of Liverpool", so instead match to neighbouring districts such as Toxteth. I'd say the database (and nearest point routine) are likely to be completely unreliable within cities, and its better to place the files in the city category (or <subject> in city) categories only.

One suggestion, that should be easy to implement, is make the bot ignore any <suburb> locations on OSM, and those marked as <fcode>PPLX</fcode> on geonames. IMO, the best solution is be to switch the localisation from a "nearest point" routine to something that looks at boundaries - but that would take more time/effort. I'll make a more detailed post on why that's a good thing to the batch page later.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:41, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

I just wanted to stop by and say that you're awesome and all the work you do on Commons and beyond is invaluable. p.s. Obviously the user above this comment does not use Firefox or they'd notice how great their spelling is. Thank you again Multichill for your awesomeness. Missvain (talk) 22:10, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

File:1865_Chapman_Sectional_Map_of_Minnesota_(_Pocket_Map_)_-_Geographicus_-_MN-chapman-1865.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Mathonius (talk) 12:08, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi,

I saw in the statistics section of Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2011/Monuments_database that it says that 100% of the Swedish entries have coordinates. As can be seen from e.g. sv:Lista över kyrkliga kulturminnen i Skåne län#Svedala_kommun this isn't the case. I'm therefore worried that the list to database process is misinterpreting the empty fields. /Lokal_Profil 16:42, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

	The Original Barnstar
	I award you this barnstar for suggesting and implementing WikiLove! (using WikiLove.js) --ZooFari 17:18, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

	The Technical Barnstar
	Hi Multichill, thanks for your efforts to commons. Especially your bots are very useful. RE rillke questions? 17:19, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

	Wikimedia Commons wizard barnstar
	Had to pick one image, but this is for all the work you’ve done here. For your bots running day and night. For your batch uploads and their countless images. For the i18n and TranslateWiki. For your devotion to Wikimedia Commons and your integrity. For mentoring me. For your awesomeness. Jean-Fred (talk) 17:54, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	Thanks for bringing WikiLove to Commons! :) Béria Lima msg 18:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

You can has kitteh

– Adrignola talk 19:09, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure if it's worth a huge amount of effort, but I think at some point Category:Images from the National Archives and Records Administration should probably be renamed to Category:Media from the National Archives and Records Administration, as it includes some video and sound files, and will hopefully soon include a lot more. The other NARA categories are also named that way ("Media contributed by..." "Media from NARA needing categories..."). It'll involve changing a few of the templates, too. Dominic (talk) 17:41, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

I agree. Just tagged it with {{Move}}. The actual move is easy (bot + template change). Multichill (talk) 18:26, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Hi!. I have some questions about the bot and the structured lists of wikipedia-es. We have some lists on wp-es that are in other wikis too like wp-gl and wp-ca, and we wanted that the bot don't read the wp-es lists of some provinces. How can we get this?, is it possible?, with some no-robot command perphaps?. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 00:31, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Where was this category re-organisation discussed? There is no tagging of it or linkage to any discussion. This is a massive change to a large structure: "Vehicles of" and "Vehicles in" are not the same thing at all. The same thing came up in March and was rejected, as it was combining and confusing these two sub-trees, one for manufacture and one for photo location. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:48, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Being discussed at Category_talk:Vehicles_by_country#.22In.22_vs._.22of.22 Andy Dingley (talk) 20:55, 27 August 2011 (UTC)