Talk:Blood Feud (The Simpsons)

There's a problem here: 'Blood Feud' leads to a simpson's episode, 'Blood feud' leads to 'feud'. I already caught links which linked to the wrong one by mistake. Anybody can help?

Misheu 11:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

This article lists Bart's blood type as O- but in fact in the episode his blood type is "double-O negative," a made-up blood type. Thus, this statement and that of Marge's blood type is inaccurate. 67.185.99.246 00:19, 26 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Don't you love it when nerds don't know they're nerds? 70.54.126.204 02:56, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Don't you love it when anonymous asshats don't know they're asshats? This is an encyclopedia article, and the information contained in it should be accurate. Correcting it, whether you approve of the content or not, is a good thing. Derision for being correct is not. --StarChaser Tyger 10:13, 28 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Can someone source the spelling of Xt'Tapalatakettle? It was spelled differently in the closed captioning.--67.183.217.39 04:31, 24 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

• That's how it was spelt in the Treehouse of Horror comic book, cf http://krustofski.com/bongo/content.php?page=thoh5

Image:The Simpsons 7F22.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:30, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

So anyway...what's the deal with the blood type section? Error or no? Lots42 (talk) 16:33, 17 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

This review is transcluded from Talk:Blood Feud (The Simpsons)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Strong Pass. Shockingly well written article, very un-bias, references are very reliable, appropriate fair use rationales on both of the photos. External links are in order, 7 sections, very informative, not overly cluttering, photo is in a good position as well as the quote box. ISTHnR | Knock Knock | Who's There? 03:11, 19 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blood Feud (The Simpsons). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://archive.is/2013.01.21-220205/http://moviemet.com/review/simpsons-complete-2nd-season-dvd-review to http://www.dvdtown.com/reviews/simpsons-the-the-complete-2nd-season/1170/2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:39, 18 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blood Feud (The Simpsons). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121015215952/http://www.thestar.com/printArticle/215831 to https://www.thestar.com/printArticle/215831

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:29, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply