Talk:Elizabeth Blackburn

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2018 and 14 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Asitari. Peer reviewers: Ggrear.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:26, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

There appears to be an error in the description of Blackburn's secondary education as being in Victorian public (i.e. government) schools. My wife has just informed me and I quote "I went to Broadland with her, but I can't edit it because the server thinks I'm a troll. LOL" I think she means Broadland House in Launceston, Tasmania (edited...she does). Broadland House has since merged with Launceston Grammar. Following on from further information from my wife, I have made some corrections to the section dealing with Blackburn's secondary education. I'm afraid we don't know about her primary years, nor indeed where she attended school in Wagga Wagga (presumable Wagga High, but I have no evidence for that). Incidentally, according to my wife, Blackburn's father Harold and her mother were both doctors in Launceston at the time she was at school there (my wife's father was also a doctor in Launceston at the same time and knew the Blackburns, so I may well be able to get more information from him soon) --Phil Wardle (talk) 04:34, 20 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Also, I tagged a conflict regarding the first two sentences (or more explanation is required): Elizabeth Blackburn being born in Hobart seems to conflict with her parents moving to the town when she was four.

This wording was approved by consensus, and then somebody changed it on 22 August to a weaker statement without giving any reason or explanation in the edit box or talk.

Blackburn's work on the President's Council on Bioethics is important, because it demonstrates how scientists are active in politics and work in the social context of science.

The fact that she was fired is also important. She was fired because she maintained a politically unpopular position that she believed was supported by the science.

Her firing provides support for the argument that the Bush Administration and their supporters are hostile to science.

Many scientists applauded Blackburn's decision to protest her firing, rather than go silently, as an example of how a scientist should act on matters of social policy.

The sources for this are cited in the Bioethics section. -- Nbauman (talk) 12:57, 5 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

In an interview that Blackburn gave in re the President's Council on Bioethics a while back -- see http://www.clinchem.org/cgi/reprint/55/4/835.pdf -- Blackburn states that she wasn't so much fired from the council as not asked to stay on for a second term, which was an attempt at a much more sinister form of marginalization than simply being fired; if fired, there would have to be some sort of cause. I remember reading other interviews quite some time ago where Blackburn went into greater detail about how she was directed to unscientific and non-peer reviewed papers by the powers that be on the council, and that she dismissed those sources as being so much rubbish. Personally, I think the story should be told about how and why her membership was unceremoniously "not renewed," and that she refused to go quietly. // Internet Esquire (talk) 07:10, 10 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Elizabeth Blackburn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061012161759/http://www.news.harvard.edu:80/gazette/daily/2006/06/08-honorary.html to http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/daily/2006/06/08-honorary.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:28, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elizabeth Blackburn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120727062701/http://achievement.org/autodoc/page/bla0int-2 to http://achievement.org/autodoc/page/bla0int-2
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091022193507/http://blogs.dnalc.org:80/dnaftb/2009/10/05/blackburn-greider-and-szostak-share-nobel-for-telomeres/ to http://blogs.dnalc.org/dnaftb/2009/10/05/blackburn-greider-and-szostak-share-nobel-for-telomeres/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:50, 22 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Elizabeth Blackburn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://blogs.dnalc.org/dnaftb/2009/10/05/blackburn-greider-and-szostak-share-nobel-for-telomeres/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110930032809/http://www.aacr.org/home/about-us/governance/officers.aspx to http://www.aacr.org/home/about-us/governance/officers.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:58, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply