Talk:False God (song)/GA1
Latest comment: 6 months ago by Gained in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: Gained (talk · contribs) 12:46, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 13:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a. (reference section):
- b. (citations to reliable sources):
- c. (OR):
- d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a. (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (major aspects):
- b. (focused):
- a. (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked are unassessed)
I will get on with this right away! --K. Peake 13:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Infobox and lead
edit- Infobox looks good!
- Remove close wikilink on riff per MOS:LINKSTYLE
- Pipe music critics to Music journalism
- "otherwise found it" → "otherwise found the song"
- "Commercially "False God" peaked at number 56" → "Commercially, the song peaked at number 59"
- List the full name of the ARIA Singles Chart
- Mention that the certification was in Australia
- "by its musical director" → "by the show's musical director" and mention the years of this performance and her tour
- Mention Ryan Hurd's cover version
- I also included James Bay if that's okay. Gained (talk) 16:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Background and release
edit- The "love letter to love itself" quote is not mentioned by the source
- "celebrity at the time" is not needed in the sentence since we know the media would be focused on her status and at the time is implied
- Wouldn't the chart positions go better in a new para of reception, retitling to simply this word?
- Personally, I think they fit better with "Background and release" and I believe it's too short to a new paragraph for it on "Critical reception". I also think that section is very tightly focused so adding info about chart performance would kinda make it a bit unfocused and forced. Gained (talk) 16:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- The correct Australia position is number 59, not 56
Production and music
edit- Audio sample looks good!
- "in New York City, and" → "in New York City (NYC), and" per later instances appearing in the article
- Pipe Michael Riddleberger to Bleachers (band)
- "Sterling Sound in New York City." → "Sterling Sound in NYC."
- Either remove the pipe on Evan Smith or send to Bleachers (band), not sure since they are already linked
- "considered it "faux-R&B"." → "considered the song "faux-R&B"."
- Re-invoke the Lipshutz ref for the slow jam sentence
- Maybe only use the dash as 1980s R&B-influenced?
- lovers' rock → lovers rock with the wikilink
Lyrical content and analysis
edit- First para looks good!
- "using heaven imagery:" → "using heavenly imagery:"
- "The couple encounters problems" → "The couple encounters challenges"
- "to make amends but" → "to make amends, but"
- "Religious imagery continue" → "Religious imagery continues"
- "my hips"[31] and ultimately accepts" → "my hips",[31] ultimately accepting"
- "the mentions of New York City and" → "the mentions of NYC and"
- Maybe it would be suitable to mention "Cruel Summer" is from this album and the other two tracks are from 1989?
Critical reception
edit- "called it a" → "called the song a"
- Refinery29 should not be italicised
- "to be confident that evoked" → "to have confidence that evoked" or something similar to be clear
- "Lipshutz ranked it third among" → "Lipshutz ranked the song third among"
- "Some critics regarded" → "A few critics regarded"
- "and the New-York references ineffective but" → "and the NYC references ineffective, but"
- "somewhat experimental production but" → "somewhat experimental production, but"
Live performances and covers
edit- Img looks good!
- The flat shoes are not sourced
- "and "vibey" and highlighting" → "and "vibey", and highlighting"
- "of the 45th Saturday Night Live season;" → "of the 45th SNL season;"
- The one on guitar and one on piano throughout the tour is not sourced as far as I can see
- "on the 53 U.S. dates,"
- Sorry what? Gained (talk) 16:02, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- "The next year, she performed" → "In 2024, she performed"
- Mention that James Bay sang the chorus as falsetto
- "on his 2020 Platonic Tour: he replaced the" → "on his 2020 Platonic Tour, replacing the"
Personnel
edit- Looks good!
Charts
edit- Looks good!
Certifications
edit- Looks good!
References
edit- Copyvio score looks great at 28.1%!!!
- Should Freezepage really be used for archiving on ref 15?
- Cite Refinery29 as publisher instead on refs 34 and 36
- I don't believe I understand.. Gained (talk) 16:10, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Wikilink Taste of Country on ref 48 per MOS:LINK2SECT
- Pipe Complex to Complex (magazine) on ref 49 per above
Final comments and verdict
edit- On hold until all of the issues are fixed; completed right on time! --K. Peake 15:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Kyle Peake! I have addressed all your points except those that I have comments above. Gained (talk) 16:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Gained Thank you and regarding the Refinery29 citations, change work to publisher and the 53 U.S. dates was added by accident from me. --K. Peake 17:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Kyle Peake I believe everything's now addressed! Gained (talk) 04:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- ✓ Pass now, this is very good sorry I was busy yesterday outside of online usage! --K. Peake 08:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Kyle Peake! Thank you very much for the review but I think you forgot to pass the article? Gained (talk) 10:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- ✓ Pass now, this is very good sorry I was busy yesterday outside of online usage! --K. Peake 08:07, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Kyle Peake I believe everything's now addressed! Gained (talk) 04:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Gained Thank you and regarding the Refinery29 citations, change work to publisher and the 53 U.S. dates was added by accident from me. --K. Peake 17:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hey @Kyle Peake! I have addressed all your points except those that I have comments above. Gained (talk) 16:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)