Talk:Fascination Records
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fascination Records article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Folded
editI think it is now confirmed that Fascination Records have folded. Article should be updated to reflect this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.166.204.88 (talk) 22:40, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- We need a source stating so. I Help, When I Can. [12] 00:41, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Joie
editis a fictional band, and have deleted its reference in this article, the actualy article should too be deleted
Fair use rationale for Image:Fascination.gif
edit
Image:Fascination.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
# does not mean 'number' in European languages, including UK English
editI've got rid of it and replaced it with the correct abbreviation for 'number', which is 'no.'
'#' means 'hash', except in dialects like the USA's English so this article read as 'hash nine' and 'hash one' etc instead of 'number nine' and 'number one'.
Still a record label?
editThe official website forwards to http://fascinationmanagement.com/ There is no mention of being a record label. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.147.168.67 (talk) 22:55, 30 November 2014 (UTC)