Talk:Hoefler & Co.

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Blythwood in topic Acquired by Monotype in 2021

Reflist for future use

edit

I intend to use this site to help create education section and how he started his job interest. --CCCSSAA7 (talk) 17:56, 24 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

I intend to use this site to do more research about their current statues and their work. --CCCSSAA7 (talk) 00:00, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Gives idea of what Frere-Jones has given to the company and has different blogs explaining more about the font bureau. --CCCSSAA7 (talk) 00:00, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

With Planet typography it offers Q&A and it gives me information about Hoefler and simple information on how he name his site and so forth. --CCCSSAA7 (talk) 00:33, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Gotham Interview with Frere-Jones gives me the start of a new paragraph of how the begun their work.

Explains and hears the speech Frere-Jones gives about the prize he's won.

it also gives information about the awards they won. --CCCSSAA7 (talk) 16:22, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Summary of revisions planned for HFJ page

edit

250 Words, Summary + outline--Theredproject (talk) 18:53, 20 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

The stub for Hoefler and Frere-Jones I intend to organize what’s already on the page and also reorder what on the stub as a mini bio for both Hoefler and Frere-Jones. For Hoefler and Frere-Jones I intend to create areas for them and a better bio for them. Such as in education, childhood, work and even how they were as teens to present. Also gather information about a timeline of Hoefler and Frere-Jones. However, also include interviews they did and their words they first created to their present work. If possible add photos of them and also their works and a gallery of different sub-areas. I also intend to use Steven Heller, "Jonathan Hoefler, on Type Design", interview to help explain parts of how Hoefler and Frere-Jones met. I plan on also with drawing more information on seeing how and when they started their work. In addition I intend on pulling information from their past interviews, where they worked and so forth to create a long enough page that could explain and help give a better understand of Hoefler and Frere-Jones to everyone. For instances create a gallery of Hoefler and Frere-Jones, and their pieces of work over the years starting with the very first piece of typography to their current piece of work they do. In addition I plan on putting in their current information if they are reachable. Mostly add information and attempt to make Hoefler & Frere-Jones well known along with their works. --CCCSSAA7 (talk) 23:34, 31 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review

edit

I see a lot of the article is quotations and websites. Maybe a little more information regarding their pasts and recent works in your own words would be helpful and get you closer to creating more of the article. It also seems as though the article is not broken up very much in categories. Most of the information is listed in one area, then broken into one other list with only links. Possibly expanding and creating more break ups in content could be helpful. Hope this helps! Ellebrager (talk) 06:02, 8 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Co

edit

Is the new name really Co, not Company nor even Co.? Is there a partner named Co? —Tamfang (talk) 00:36, 26 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Ah, the press release says "Whether as The Hoefler Type Foundry, Hoefler & Frere-Jones, or Hoefler & Co., our company has...."
So the new name does have a dot. —Tamfang (talk) 00:38, 26 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for pointing this out, I added the missing dot to the name. —Fitoschido [shouttrack] @ 27 January, 2014; 11:23

Frere-Jones Title and Position

edit

Hi there, I came to this wiki entry looking for information about the lawsuit between Frere-Jones and Hoefler. Wikipedia usually has pretty good up-to-the-minute news! I'm curious about the choice of calling Frere-Jones "former staff member Tobias Frere-Jones". It seems like the title is taking a pretty strong point-of-view on whether the lawsuit is valid or not. Perhaps leaving off the title would and just saying "On January 16, 2014, type designer Tobias Frere-Jones filed a lawsuit in New York state alleging that he was entitled to own half of the type foundry, based on an oral agreement made in 1999 by which Frere-Jones transferred ownership of his fonts to the company for 10 USD and the company was renamed Hoefler & Frere-Jones. Jones claimed the oral agreement made the company an equal partnership while Hoefler claims that Frere-Jones was a staff member."

128.237.177.35 (talk) 16:48, 6 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Good phrasing: I'll put that in. Thanks a lot. For the record, I hoped that 'staff member' didn't take a side as to whether he was a partner or not, but OK. Blythwood (talk) 17:51, 28 September 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Hoefler & Co.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:12, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Acquired by Monotype in 2021

edit

[1]. Suzukaze-c (talk) 04:48, 16 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Have thought about how to word an update and have added it to the article now. I haven't made major changes to the text though. Blythwood (talk) 03:02, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Explored in this essay at Quartz: To see H&Co gobbled up by Monotype was a great blow felt by solo practitioners and small studios, [...]. Suzukaze-c (talk) 11:20, 27 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yes, that article was excellent. Well researched and interviewed the right people. I'd added it to the Monotype article but not on here, so I've added it now. Blythwood (talk) 07:43, 30 October 2021 (UTC)Reply