Talk:Hollywood, Los Angeles
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hollywood, Los Angeles article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 26 March 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Not moved. The previous discussion ended a week ago. If you wish to challenge it, WP:MR is the venue. (closed by non-admin page mover) Calidum 01:18, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
– Previous discussion was a major change made with insufficient notice or discussion. The name Hollywood is a shorthand reference for the Los Angeles neighborhood and for the U.S. film industry headquartered there. The change made earlier should be reversed. --evrik (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 19:59, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose there was quite clear consensus for the RM which was open for over 11 days to move given as noted there are over 100 other uses. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:08, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Support second move only - Hollywood should redirect to Cinema of the United States Red Slash 20:38, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose — there was a pretty clear consensus for this in the above Requested Move discussion. Paintspot Infez (talk) 21:18, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per previous consensus. Mannysoloway (talk) 23:56, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose. Previous move was fine. --Coolcaesar (talk) 00:07, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Request Procedural Close There's no rationale presented for a move (a move review would be at MRV, but don't bother with that either); this can be closed. User:力 (powera, π, ν) 02:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- There would likely be no grounds for a move review and since this doesn't bring up much more than already mentioned I indeed think we can just speedy close this but I won't do that as I'm involved and 1 editor has suggested Cinema of the United States should be primary but this now looks like SNOW. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose and SNOW close. OP's reasoning is flawed - adequate notice was given and participation was ample to gain a consensus. In fact, OP's 2nd sentence rightly points out that "Hollywood" has at least two major meanings, which justifies having the disambiguation page at primary. -- Netoholic @ 04:31, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
First studio
editI have removed some sources that were not real sources and corrected the text. I have done something similar at Hollywood. I don't know enough about the subject to know: Was Nestor Film Company really the first studio here? That article itself says it was not. I'm also going to mention this on Talk:Hollywood so everyone will see it. Invasive Spices (talk) 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Hollywood Stars of the Pacific Coast League
editReally? Nothing about the Hollywood Stars of the PCL baseball league? Why not? 2601:283:8301:820:0:0:0:9BBB (talk) 05:22, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: STS 1010
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2023 and 5 May 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Sem2024 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Amcsparkplug, Cbrow25.
— Assignment last updated by Jessicacariello (talk) 14:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)