Talk:Tony Blackburn

Is the fact that he is switching on the folkstone xmas lights actually a piece of info that everyone wants to know about? Fair enough that the people of Folkstone & surrounding areas may be interested, this is a world wide encyclopaedia, so someone in Vancouver for instance may not really care about that. Just my view. 88.108.170.60 (talk) 22:53, 16 November 2007 (UTC) (infernoradio)Reply

Well spotted, I have removed. Thanks, SqueakBox 22:56, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Maybe the article should mention his appearances as presenter of the BBC TV "Top of the Pops" show in the 70s and 80s. I also remember him having his own TV Chat show (It might have been daily) on the original Sky Television channel in the 1980s. Can anyone verify this and add it in properly? 82.152.44.250 (talk) 23:28, 8 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

He is Currently presenter of BBC London 94.9 'Soul on Sunday' ^[1] 12pm-3pm Sundays. This needs to be added to the to the 'Media offices' table on the main page but I don't know how to. Can someone please do it? 212.159.79.211 (talk) 16:42, 24 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tony Blackburn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20140116220102/http://www.radioacademy.org/podcast/get.php?fla=podcast-2013-02-07-43217.mp3 to http://www.radioacademy.org/podcast/get.php?fla=podcast-2013-02-07-43217.mp3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

I dislike this term as it is a euphemism and moreover one which carries an outdated implication that it describes an illegal act (cf. "committed murder", "committed arson" etc). I had a wider discussion a year or two ago about this in which I was initially against bluntly saying "killed herself" but came around to the view I now hold. At that time it was demonstrated to me that the older term is deprecated by modern professionals in the relevant fields. I am not sure I could now find that discussion but I would plead with others not to simply revert changes like this out of hand. --John (talk) 23:18, 29 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

It is generally known that committing suicide is not an illegal act. It was before 1961 in the UK, and it is unfortunate that the construction gives that impression, but "committed suicide" is still standard usage. Sorry, but your reference to "modern professionals" reads like original research.

While subtly is not a policy requirement, avoiding sensationalist language (which is used mainly by the tabloids) is a condition editors are supposed to observe. Unfortunately, I inaccurately interpreted the reference to an overdose in the source as suicide, as McAlpine's end is almost universally described elsewhere, though of course such a cause could interrupted as an accidental death. But giving the impression she died accidentally is out of place in the context when sources do not sustain it. My main reason for adding the source which mentions her overdose was the month, which was previously elusive in reliable sources. So I forgot I was making an interpretation. Philip Cross (talk) 14:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Tastes differ. I regard "committed suicide" as pretty awful language now, and prefer the plain-spoken term. On Wikipedia we eschew euphemism; cf. "passed away" vs. "died". I have implemented a compromise which I hope we can both live with. Now, a far greater problem. Blackburn is a living person and the current state of the article gives far too much weight to his recent problems. There are also far too many quotations. If we can agree on this I can take a shot at cleaning it up. It can't stay as it is.--John (talk) 17:54, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

While the issue is still news, is it being recent-heavy a problem at the moment? Especially as some of the media are intentionally reporting this in a misleading way ("She spent the night with a singer. Tony Blackburn released songs.") Also, I have seen at least two local newspapers reporting the story almost verbatim from this Wikipedia article, so some are finding it professionally useful as it is! SandJ-on-WP (talk) 18:11, 2 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tony Blackburn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150415163149/http://www.kmfm.co.uk/on-air/presenters/tony-blackburn to http://www.kmfm.co.uk/on-air/presenters/tony-blackburn

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:40, 23 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

After his wife left him in the mid-70s, Tony Blackburn famously spent his whole show crying on air and playing "If You Leave Me Now" over and over - is this something that should be mentioned in the article? It seems fairly noteworthy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.150.173.71 (talk) 09:05, 8 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

I just have one question.

Why is nothing written in the article about Tony Blackburn about his work at BFBS?

After all, Tony presented the show "Soulstation" there in the middle of the 80s.

Should the article be revised in this regard? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.187.120.173 (talk) 10:43, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Somewhat surprising this article has survived so long with no source for his date of birth. BBC here has 1943. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:41, 27 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Here are a couple of book sources: Oxford Dictionary of Humorous Quotations and Historical Dictionary of British Radio Martinevans123 (talk) 10:57, 28 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

A search at FreeBMD for any Blackburn born between 1939 and 1945 reveals none with middle initial K, none with mother's name of Cubitt or Stone, and none born anywhere near Surrey. This seems a bit odd. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:01, 5 August 2021 (UTC) p.s. it was there on 6 February 2021, when I found it with no problem (see "Birth name" below).Reply

Here's a blog source (so not reliable) but looks very well-researched: [1]. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:33, 5 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

His birth name is Anthony Kenneth Blackburn. That is clear from primary sources such as the GRO Civil Registration Birth Index, and is also the name under which he was married in 1972. (These are public documents, available from subscription-based sites like Ancestry.com.) However, the Oxford Reference here does give his name as simply Kenneth Blackburn. It is a so-called "reliable source" - but it's clearly wrong on this occasion. We shouldn't base the opening sentence of the article, especially one about a notable living person, on a single, wrong, source - but what alternative, accurate, secondary sources would editors suggest? Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

GoogleSearchBooks suggests his autobiography, but there is no snippet view for me. Does anyone have a copy? (Might also be good idea to mention those book on the article!) Martinevans123 (talk) 13:55, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Not sure autobiographies are necessarily reliable though... Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:46, 6 February 2021 (UTC) PS: Just corrected myself - his name is spelled Antony - no h - if that makes a difference on searches. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:49, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Oh no. I've heard that somewhere before. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC) Reply

Maybe the spelling correction does make a difference. Here's the BBC - https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b04cppr1 - and here's the National Portrait Gallery - https://www.npg.org.uk/collections/search/person/mp84181/antony-kenneth-tony-blackburn. Ghmyrtle (talk) 14:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yes, here he is at FreeBMD: [2]. That NPG source looks good enough to me. Martinevans123 (talk) 14:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Note: this source has now disappeared. Martinevans123 (talk) 10:34, 5 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

We have only the currently used two at Commons. While the lead image is quite good, there is that awkward hand clashing thing going on. Here are two possible flickr candidates, copyright permitting: [3] and [4]. Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 09:51, 5 August 2021 (UTC)Reply