76.65.128.222

If you're going un-refuse my request, you could have deleted this message. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 09:21, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

{{talkback|User_talk:Harryboyles#file:The_King.27s_Highway_11_Ontario_.28East.29.png}}

replied -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 12:53, 9 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for Upload! The file has been uploaded. You can find it at File:Saint Lawrence River and New England at night in summer 2013.jpg. See Wikipedia:Images#Using images to learn image syntax, or Wikipedia:Creation and usage of media files for other types of files. Regards, Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 05:47, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for Upload! The file has been uploaded. You can find it at File:Lac-Megantic derailment from space (4 July crop).jpg. See Wikipedia:Images#Using images to learn image syntax, or Wikipedia:Creation and usage of media files for other types of files. Regards, Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:40, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for Upload! The file has been uploaded. You can find it at File:Lac-Megantic derailment from space (6 July crop).jpg. See Wikipedia:Images#Using images to learn image syntax, or Wikipedia:Creation and usage of media files for other types of files. Regards, Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:40, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. There is not really much point in posting your image deletion nominations on the project talk pages as those who are interested in such matter have a suitable alert page, such as this one where the nominations show up. Also, some projects do not assess files, such as the Philately project while the Ireland project does not find it useful; of the 40,000+ project banners only 56 images have the project tags and several are rather recent by anonIP editors like yourself who may believe you are helping but in this case it is not constructive. If you want to be involved in project assessment perhaps you would become a registered editor and join the appropriate project and consult the assessment criteria in order to ensure the banners you add are appropriately done. Your editing energy is appreciated but perhaps you can use it to add content to articles to improve them. Good luck. ww2censor (talk) 10:12, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Actually, they do not show up on that page, because they are not FFDs. (indeed, you should have noticed that the posted notices have not shown up at the Article Alerts page at all) Also, they only show up in that automated list if they are tagged with the Wikiproject Banner or if files are properly categorized under an Ireland category tree. That is because the Article Alerts bot uses the project banner to determine which projects to inform of deletion nominations. As PUFs and Speedy Deletions are not listed by the bot, they do not show up on that list. Also, at WT:FFD, it was determined it was a good thing to do to inform the related Wikiprojects whenever a file comes up for deletion that is potentially under their purview.

If you believe that properly formatting and attributing images, and filling out their missing information pages, in their file descriptions is a waste of time, that's your opinion.

And some of the other projects have expressed welcome and gratitude for being informed, and fixing the problems with the file page information. So, I will just discontinue informing WPIRELAND of any future deletions then. I will also discontinue fixing Ireland-related files.

-- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 11:04, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

You are in fact correct about the article alert pages: images do need the banner to appear there, so maybe my suggestion was not entirely accurate. BTW, the Ireland project has long ago given up using the WPIRELAND tag but uses {{WikiProject Ireland}} instead. If the images are FFD but not project tagged it may indeed be a good idea to let the project know. Fixing Irish related, and other project, files is a good idea but tagging them with the project banner makes little useful sense to some. I noticed that at least one project appreciates your work. We do too, but within the parameters of the project's assessment criteria. Thanks for your work. ww2censor (talk) 18:38, 10 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

{{talkback|Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Philately|File deletions and WPPHILATELY}} ww2censor (talk) 08:39, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

replied -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 08:44, 11 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

Jimbo has requested that people not post on his talk page until July 21. I respectfully request that you honor his reasonable request, and post your concerns elsewhere until then. Thank you very much. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:34, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

It said that anything posted there would not be read on until July 21. That's fine by me. It's a note to Jimbo. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:35, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps you misunderstood. Jimbo asked that nothing be posted on his talk page until July 21, and also posted a convenient list of alternate places to raise such issues in the interim. Thanks again. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 04:44, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

It's a note meant for Jimbo, so "Please be aware that he will not respond until he is back." applies. He had a position he advanced in the past on the issue as well. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:59, 13 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

{{tb|Template talk:R from NYC bus route|Editprotected|ts=by '''''[[User:JPæst|<span style="color: #00FF0F;">J</span>]][[Special:Contributions/JPaestpreornJeolhlna|<span style="color: #0FF;">~</span>]][[User talk:JPæst|<span style="color: #00F;">Pæst</span>]]''''' at  17:30, 13 July 2013 (UTC)}}

Thanks -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:11, 14 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, such as the one you made on Principle (disambiguation). I greatly appreciate your efforts to fight vandalism and make constructive edits on Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Recent changes patrol
• Anti-vandalism tools

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (76.65.128.222) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! -- ^t numbermaniac ^c 08:06, 17 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:49, 21 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

•   Comment: That page did not exist when I submitted my request -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 03:47, 27 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Does the Brückenpanzer 68 still need copyediting? If not, tell me, or remove the tag.--DThomsen8 (talk) 13:44, 27 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the tag -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:31, 28 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

There is a discussion at this location which involves you. --Philpill691 (talk) 21:59, 27 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:32, 28 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I just wanted to let you know I moved the infobox you created down to the section on the aircraft itself. Regards, --Forward Unto Dawn 11:38, 1 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Moved to commons - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Template:PD-GermanGov-currency shows they are keeping currency with a "PD-GermanGov-currency" template - now added.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 23:30, 2 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

I did not think that this article met criteria for speedy deletion as you proposed. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:47, 8 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Wouldn't that require a new AfD to determine whether we keep it or not, to override the currently established consensus, since the last AfD was only in June ? -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:08, 8 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

No, WP:G4 says, "This excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version, pages to which the reason for the deletion no longer applies". Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 04:19, 8 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

•   Comment: Your comment on duplication is clearly wrong, did you bother to match each entry against the other page? They are clearly different. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 00:31, 9 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 03:48, 9 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for Upload! The file has been uploaded. You can find it at File:Edouard Dethier.jpg. See Wikipedia:Images#Using images to learn image syntax, or Wikipedia:Creation and usage of media files for other types of files. Regards, Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:36, 9 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

A tag has been placed on Charles Windsor (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
• disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 07:39, 9 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hello - you participated in the RM at Talk:Rochester, New York metropolitan area. There is a related discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(geographic_names)#Commas_in_metro_areas which may interest you. If you have not done so, please consider contributing to the survey or discussion. Thanks! Dohn joe (talk) 00:04, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads up. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:17, 10 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

No problem. Also, just fyi, feel free to contribute to the "one comma" versus "two commas" part of the survey - it's separate from the alternative construction part of the survey, and the two parts are not exclusive. Dohn joe (talk) 19:34, 12 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Ict map.jpg isn't of scenic byway, state highway or major county road. Thanks for the notification and project tagging, but it isn't in the USRD scope. (If it was, the Article Alerts bot would notify the project once it was tagged for USRD, btw.) Imzadi 1979 → 04:12, 11 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ok. Though, ArticleAlertsBot doesn't work with PUF (non-FFD) deletion nominations, so it wouldn't have informed your project. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:15, 11 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Has been in main space since April of this year... sats 08:09, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

It didn't have the prerequisite number of supporters at the Council ballot page, so I'm surprised it exists as a project already. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 08:11, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Council is broke as far as I can tell - so is that the reason you are proceeding with Americas? I am suprised someone hasnt jumped you for incorrect usage of caps... sats 08:14, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Incorrect usage of caps? I don't see what you mean? Americas also didn't have the prerequisite number of supporters, but also seems to have been created. I only noticed after someone else told me Oceania already existed.

When did Council's proposal process break? (I've noticed several non-proposed WikiProjects have gotten dumped to MfD recently though) -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 08:17, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Oh, you mean the shortcut, no that conforms with WP:SHORTCUT Shortcuts are presented in all capital letters -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 08:22, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

damned edit conflicts, roll on flow...

I thought I saw a page/heading with americas all in caps it might have preceded your editing, sorry about that

As for council - the page has looksed messy and unmaintained for ages...

be sure to let the south american and north american projects know you are forging ahead with the america project - it is a very valid 'umbrella project' which is why asia was created - it makes a whole lot of categories and component projects fit better along side each other... and overall helps organisation and scope issues of sister and child projects - so it is very valid, more poweer to you - I just find stretching too far into too many projects an issue...sats 08:25, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

you should get a user name btw sats 08:26, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Actually, I just got round to informing them that someone proposed Americas for creation, then I find out that it's already been created, so I was poking around it. As the shortcut for the project page already existed, I just matched the talk page for it (as per other projects). As for building it out, I'm not sure about that, there's a Mexican user who seems to despise users from Canada (my IP address is in Canada right now), working seriously on anything like WPAMERICAS will probably very shortly get me accused of calling Mexico not part of North America, just like when I created WP:WikiProject North America, and was hounded out of it by baseless accusations concerning everyone in Canada. (I specifically proposed the project to cover Mexico, USA, Canada and Greenland, in the proposal itself, but that doesn't matter to someone who sees all Canadians as the same person) I don't bother going to WP:NORTHAMERICA anymore, since why bother. I avoid anything to do with WPMEXICO, it's a useless waste of time trying to discuss anything without getting a baseless accusation thrown in my face just because of my current location. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 08:40, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hmmm that info is a bit concerning. A whole range of possible sanctions for unacceptable behaviours come to mind... sats 08:45, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

There's plenty of other things on Wikipedia, and North America has plenty of editors, so it doesn't really affect much. Whether the Americas gets editors are not, would be if people from the various Americas projects are interested in the umbrella or not. It's just like every other thing on Wikipedia, if you're an IP user, someone will call you a sockpuppet because the only IP editors who voice opinions must be sockpuppets, someone will delete your comments because only registered users are allowed to voice opinions, etc. It's a fact of life on Wikipedia. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 08:53, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

You were trying to add text into the move template, but it went into Anthony Appleyard's comment instead. I've removed it a second time, for that reason. —rybec 15:11, 18 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

It's the actual nomination, and without that text, you're breaking user:RMCD bot, which is the listing bot for WP:RM. The requested move is incorrectly formatted, so isn't being picked up properly by the bot. It's not supposed to go into the template. It's supposed to after the template and before the rationale in this format. The bot scrapes the code and tries to find the rationale, which it will not find if the nomination is incorrectly formatted, which it is when you reverted the change. That bit is supposed to be autogenerated when you use the substitution template that a standard RM request uses. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

I see that it's needed; would you mind if it came before Anthony Appleyard's comment (i.e. on its own line, before the asterisk) rather than within it? Tariqabjotu suggested adding the reason, which appears to be that in Arabic the definite article Al- is always used in the name of this place. —rybec 16:19, 18 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

If it works, go for it. If not, revert is just a step away (RMCD bot runs every 15 minutes, AFAIR, so it takes that long to see if the change broke something) -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 01:40, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

If you'd like to move these images to Commons, please do so now. If you like editing anonymously, please create a one-time account simply to transfer the images. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 17:00, 18 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and thank you for your request at Files for upload! Unfortunately, your request has been declined. The reason is shown on the main FFU page. The request will be archived shortly; if you cannot find it on that page, it will probably be at this month's archive. Regards, -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 02:48, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Would you mind flagging them as being user reviewed? (and indicate which ones have any problems for commons) -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 03:04, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Continuitybot is having objections, wonder why's that. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk)

Protection on {{Infosplit}} has expired so your edit request at Template_talk:Infosplit is no longer active. 67.100.127.173 (talk) 18:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

It was never protected, page creation is protected. You should already know that, considering the nature of my request, and the fact that you are on an IP account. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 03:17, 21 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

{{Talkback|Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 August 22#File:ISR-HW5 blue.PNG|ts = }}

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Atefrat (talk • contribs) 09:26, 22 August 2013‎ (UTC)Reply

replied -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 10:46, 22 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

{{talkback|Talk:Neon Genesis Evangelion|Requested move 21 August 2013|ts=18:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)}}

I have modified my initial request per your suggestions. —Ryulong (琉竜) 18:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

replied -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 04:32, 23 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gladiators: The Ashes 1 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• {{For|other meanings of "The Ashes"|The Ashes (disambiguation)]]}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:23, 29 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I made a typo, I'll go and fix it. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 05:26, 29 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

I have changed Talk:Korban olah RM towards Burnt offering (Judaism) as you requested. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:05, 29 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

replied -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 07:14, 29 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, it looks like you tagged the image File:Guidon of the Queen's Royal Irish Hussars.jpg for errors. I need to ask for your help in respect of that. I copied the licencing etc from File:Image of QAMR Guidon.png which was uploaded in 2007. Is there a particular reason why the guidon image I uploaded is different from the one already there? I'm asking because, if I've made an error, I want to be able to correct it properly and maintain the use of the image and also because I don't want to make the same error in future. Thanks. SonofSetanta (talk) 11:32, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Actually, it was user:ImageTaggingBot that did it [1], but I'll take a look at it. -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 11:41, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. I appreciate it. SonofSetanta (talk) 12:02, 1 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

I require your input on something Insulam Simia (talk · contribs) 18:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Any comments regarding this closure? I moved to Good for Me (Amy Grant song), only to see it reverted. What's the point of a discussion if somebody else's POV is more important than consensus. And I am accused of pulling a trick! --Richhoncho (talk) 21:08, 10 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

...here Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#Semi-protect_all_templates.3F Tito☸Dutta 18:24, 22 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

You were involved in a move request at this article. A second request to move this article from United States v. Microsoft Corp. has been opened. A previous move request was closed 45 days ago with the move to the current title. Interested editors may weigh in at Talk:United States v. Microsoft Corp.#Requested move 2. Regards, GregJackP Boomer! 06:55, 15 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

  You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (geographic names)#En dash vs. "and" for multi-state metro areas. Herostratus (talk) 18:33, 11 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Windsor, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:50, 31 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charles X (disambiguation), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 20:55, 2 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello 76.65.128.222. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Charles X (disambiguation)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charles X (disambiguation)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —Anne Delong (talk) 02:36, 7 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello 76.65.128.222. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "George Windsor".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/George Windsor}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 01:43, 15 March 2014 (UTC)Reply