Belshay

Since Frank P. Pellegrino was brought into the mainspace on 25 January, you have until 30 January to nominate a hook from this article to the Did You Know project if you so choose. A successful DYK nomination would feature a fact from the article on Main Page. Chris Troutman (talk) 20:44, 26 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Some of the files that you have uploaded may be unfree. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 March 8#OTRS pending since January for details. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:53, 8 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I can't see the comments of why the article was unaccepted. WAIHF (talk) 08:42, 14 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for looking at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Camp Lambec - Lambec Lake. Mind looking at it again? When the article gets published, I think it should go here: Camp Lambec. Thanks! --evrik ^(talk) 15:10, 14 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi

This article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Simone Muench was not accepted and I have no idea why?

Can you help me please?

Thank you Richard — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Every (talk • contribs) 03:49, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sam Kogan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

The Ukulele Dude - Aggie80 (talk) 12:28, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Belshay

I amended the page with citations. I think i understand what you meant. Please review.

Much appreciated.

Richard — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Every (talk • contribs) 12:35, 16 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Belshay, I had marked this as under review because it looks to be suitable for Wiki and clearly needs some help. If you look back at the page before you redeclined you will see it had a blue 'under review' banner and request to leave the editor to it. It's a small courtesy to leave a page under review alone, but greatly appreciated. Many thanks. Libby norman (talk) 00:49, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

NB, have undone your revision, which I wouldn't normally do, but this seems to be the only way at present to place it back under review so I can work on the page. Many thanks. Libby norman (talk) 00:59, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

So sorry, I honestly don't know how I could have missed that. I definitely was in the wrong. Will try and be more careful next time. 75.80.176.124 Belshay (talk) 04:06, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

No worries at all – I figured it was a mistake and don't think it helps that the blue header comes right at at the bottom on an article with so many pink rejection notices! Usually under review articles come right at the end of Afc – divided from the rest – but that's also easy to miss when there are so many pages to work through, which there usually are. Hoping to retrieve this one to get it off the backlog as it clearly does exist and I've found what look to be reliable external sources. All best wishes. Libby norman (talk) 11:43, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi Belshay,

Thanks for reviewing Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Langgai Tinggang. I've been notified that there were some changes made to, but I'm still not sure what were the changes made. Not quite sure if there is a way to see it.. Anyway, I realized that the status of that article says, "(Cleaning Wikipedia:Articles for creation submission (AFCH))". May I know what does this status actually means? Sorry, I've tried looking around about it, still a newbie.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeblat (talk • contribs) 13:48, 19 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reviewing the article I submitted Draft: UP College of Engineering Library. I already removed all the external links as you've mentioned. I will be really thankful if you can review it again. Or shall I say, thank you in advance? :) Engglibrarian (talk) 01:40, 21 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

I have tried to re-edit my Hugh Pilkington article along the lines you suggested. Would tyou have time toreview it again? Many thanks and best wishes, Ron Witton Rawitton (talk) 01:19, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello Belshay, I have created an article "List of tourist attractions in Haiti" which was unfortunately declined by you because for some reason the submission was blank. I re-added the text. Please Review. Thank you. Jeanbapw (talk) 19:14, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello Belshay, I have created an article "List of tourist attractions in Haiti" which was unfortunately declined by you because for some reason the submission was blank. I re-added the text. Please Review. Thank you. Jeanbapw (talk) 18:57, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Requesting input at the discussion: !Vote requested to clarify matters about awards sent. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:22, 13 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

To editor Belshay: I had forgotten until recently that my first interaction with you was approving your submissions through AfC. It has been my opinion that you've been a good faith contributor. The fact that you performed so many reviews during the backlog drive in such a short span of time is troubling to me. I would feel a lot better if you could provide some explanation along those lines at the AfC talk page (mentioned above). Chris Troutman (talk) 07:54, 14 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello Belshay, Thank you for reviewing the article. I'm seeking help in getting the article on the Foundation published. Would you be able to help? 151.225.120.69 (talk) 09:09, 21 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi

I had submitted an afc called National centre For Excellence but for the past 2 consecutive attempts the problem was " Not reliable sources ". I have surfed the net for reliable source for my afc and i have listed all of the ones I got. Help please.

link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/National_Centre_For_Excellence

Thank you, Sincerely, Rahul — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rahulmdinesh (talk • contribs) 10:29, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) I have given our new friend an answer and advice on my own talk page, advice you may like to see, even disagree with. I've also left a comment on the draft article. The organisation feels as if it ought to be notable, but I can find nothing so far to verify my gut reaction. Fiddle Faddle 11:33, 28 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello Belshay,

I am working on a project to support the development of current and future newcomer mentorship programs on Wikipedia.

Because you recently participated in the Articles for creation, I would like to interview you about your experience in this program.

If you are interested, please email me at gmugar [at] syr.edu and hopefully we can find a convenient time to conduct an interview via Skype or Google hangout.

Thanks,

Gabrielm199 (talk) 14:39, 3 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Andrew Tilles, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bucket shop. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:25, 2 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hello Belshay. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).Reply

       Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Frank Pellegrino (disambiguation), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 7 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello Belshay. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Frank Pellegrino".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Draft:Frank Pellegrino (disambiguation)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 13:56, 16 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi Belshay! I found you on the list of participants over at WP:COMPANIES and I thought I'd say hello. You listed historical American companies in your interests, so you might be interested in the article for MetLife. Working on behalf of the company, I'm currently trying to make some improvements to the article, and I could use some feedback. You can check out what I've proposed here and give me feedback if you're interested. Thanks, 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 16:36, 10 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Julyan Sinclair

added a link pointing to Tabloids

Lucy Dorsey Iams

added a link pointing to Democratic Party

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:19, 5 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Applied Science University (Bahrain)

added a link pointing to Administrative sciences

Flaccid dysarthria

added a link pointing to Traumatic

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 12 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Category:World War II manufacturers of military equipment, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. MilborneOne (talk) 08:07, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article International Hat Company you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 17:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

The article International Hat Company you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:International Hat Company for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 23:01, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you recently ranked Cambridge Analytica as "low" priority on the WikiProject Companies importance scale. I am inexperienced at assessing companies according to this scale, but your assessment doesn't seem to me to match the scale's stated criteria for "low". Given that the company may have had a pivotal influence on the United States Presidential Election, 2016, and has been profiled as such in lengthy pieces in several respected newspapers, are you sure it doesn't warrant at least a "mid" ranking or higher? Thanks for your time. zazpot (talk) 13:01, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello Zazpot, thank you for taking the time to contact me. I reassessed the Cambridge Analytica article, due to it having multiple locations both in the UK and the US. Thanks for providing objective criteria. Another good metric for a mid-importance company is assessing the number of employees that the company has. It's easier to tell with publicly traded companies based on market valuation but certainly private companies can be any level of importance on the scale. Though, the importance scale does not determine the worth or value of the article itself, only it's priority within a specific scope of project work to a group of editors working to improve articles. But I have reassessed Cambridge Analytica as mid-importance. If you have any other questions or concerns, just let me know. Belshay (talk) 14:20, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! zazpot (talk) 14:55, 16 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Harrias ^talk 01:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating Graham Paper Company, Belshay!

Wikipedia editor Markdask just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice article - well put together :)

To reply, leave a comment on Markdask's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Mark^Dask 23:37, 25 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Belshay! I saw you're listed as an active participant of WikiProject Companies, and I was wondering if you'd be open to reviewing a draft article about an Ohio-based company? I've been working with Aleris to draft an expanded and improved article, which I've saved here for community review. I've posted requests for assistance at WikiProjects Companies and Ohio, but so far no changes have been made to the live article. Do you have any interest in reviewing? If so, please see my talk page post here. Thanks for your consideration. Inkian Jason (talk) 15:59, 1 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

This request has been answered. Take care! Inkian Jason (talk) 17:41, 22 August 2018 (UTC)Reply