Cooldudeseven7

Got something to discuss? Lets talk over a cup of tea:

Hi. I saw that you had your rollback permissions request denied. I agree with the rationale, but I'm not writing to "spike the football". Rather I wanted to suggest that you install Twinkle which gives you a convenient rollback button. I think it's a bit slower than rollback, but I use it frequently and I have never felt the need to ask for rollback rights so I wouldn't know.

Good luck with your editing. It does take time to learn policies and guidelines, and to gain skills at wiki-markup. I think I'm a lot farther along in my learning than you and I still make mistakes (usually the kind a bot picks up). Oblivy (talk) 23:34, 16 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

already have twinkle and ultraviolet, thanks for the tip. Cooldudeseven7 ^{tea talk} 00:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello

You reverted an edit I made to her profile. She was a pupil at my school, where I have taught for the last 31 years. I have no citation to use as you request. Therefore I would appreciate you keep my edit and not archive it. Let me know anuyhing I can do.

Perhap this will help though Alumni: Five Ways Edwardians - King Edward VI Five Ways (kefw.org)

Regards Stuart Shephard 62.253.196.130 (talk) 13:37, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

https://www.kefw.org/one-more-post/ 62.253.196.130 (talk) 13:43, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Is the text that you changed fully inside of the reference you gave me?

Elsewise it would count as 'original research and wouldn't be allowed on wikipedia.

  Thanks

If yes, I will go and remove the warning.

If not, I will have to revert your edit again. Cooldudeseven7 ^{tea talk} 14:09, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Are you sure this reference is:

notable

strictly independent of the subject

secondary?

and it follows the BLP policy Cooldudeseven7 ^{tea talk} 14:15, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Another alarming thing is that it must follow the BLP policy. When editing the article, a notification will state

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Take extra care to use high-quality sources. Material about living persons should not be added when the only sourcing is tabloid journalism; see more information on sources. Never use self-published sources about a living person unless written or published by the subject; see Wikipedia's guidelines on self-published sources and using the subject as a self-published source.

Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. If you are connected to one of the subjects of this article and need help, see this page. Cooldudeseven7 ^{tea talk} 14:11, 17 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. It seems that I will still have to revert your edit due to Original Research. If you have any comments, please express them. Cooldudeseven7 _{join in on the tea talk} 14:40, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

One of the editors (User:Ltbdl) has been blocked from editing, so he will be unable to continue the dispute with us. As one of the volunteers who has been helping us reach a consensus, I thought that I should make you aware of this news directly. I hope that this does not cause problems. I am unsure if I am allowed to talk more casually here, but if I am, please tell me.
This was from Thought 1915 (talk) 01:24, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

First of all, Welcome to my talk page! This shouldn't cause any problems- and there's no problem talking casual here. I guess the ^{[citation needed]} idea is going the best? (there also is an option for ^{[verification needed]} as an alternative) Cooldudeseven7 ^{tea talk} 11:15, 18 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Since you're involved in the DRN with a topic that is dealing with the infobox. I have been going around and notifying the involved editors that infoboxes are considered a contentious topic. Brocade River Poems (She/They) 09:28, 19 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Which DRN is this related to, just for clarification?

thanks, Cooldudeseven7 ^{tea talk} 23:35, 20 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

a goat

PublicSafetyEditing (talk) 13:26, 21 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

As per your request, an example of the small section is here in your talk page. I mentioned this example in the dispute before as well as how it could possibly be placed in on my personal sandbox. You asked if everybody agreed to this, and to that I say that SuperStain agreed to this when I mentioned it before.

Small section example: After 1.5 years of waiting, much of the community has felt that 15 had abandoned the project due to a lack of contact, 15's usage of the domain for other projects [something about tf2.15.ai would go here], and working on other activities. The community surrounding this projects believes it to be abandoned. Thought 1915 (talk) 14:24, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Alright! good to see that that its nice and   Accepted I still dont exactly understand tf2.15.ai, as when I visited it just showed details about a Team Fortress 2 server... Thanks so much! ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 _{join in on the tea talk} 14:46, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

The TF2 Server is completely unrelated to the original project, 15.ai. It also is run by 15, which shows that 15 is dedicating time to other projects. As for the sub-culture within the server, I do not understand it either. Thought 1915 (talk) 19:02, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Death date was vandelized and I fixed it. tab says death first birth second I grabbed the edit using someone else's article Month Day and Year I also noticed wiki using born 29 March 1967 for some reason that doesnt make sense to me I did not violate BLP 47.203.216.242 (talk) 18:20, 23 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Alright, will go and revert MY edit. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 _{join in on the tea talk} 11:33, 24 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Just a question- is the problem the references or the notability of the article? Thank you! ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 _{join in on the tea talk} 11:07, 28 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Cooldudeseven7. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Revival Lo Rural, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:36, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Cooldudeseven7. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Was the Voynich Manuscript the Creation of a Noble Child? A Fresh Look at an Age-Old Mystery, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 13:56, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

This seems like an AI generated text and clearly isn't like a wikipedia article. What speedy deletion would be the most suitable even if it isn't valid (just a question) ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 _{join in on the tea talk} 13:58, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

None. It is not eligible for speedy deletion. Specific speedy deletion criteria have community consensus and can be applied. Anything else is not eligible and would need to use some other deletion mechanism if you feel it really should be deleted. Note that the draft name space was created specifically for editors to develop potential articles and to work out problems so the expectation is that drafts will be in poor shape. If you really think this needs to be deleted, then you can nominate it for deletion at WP:MFD. I would recommend against doing this, as you really have not let the creator of the draft make any effort to improve it. -- Whpq (talk) 14:06, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Alright. Thanks for the heads up. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 _{join in on the tea talk} 14:07, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Cooldudeseven7. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Marilyn Robert, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not an unambiguous copyright infringement, or there is other content to save. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 19:35, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Golden Edge. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:24, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, the simple english wikipedia page has no references after I translated it. Cant I put the unreferenced tag and publish? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Cooldudeseven7 _{join in on the tea talk} 15:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply