Edwininlondon

Hi Edwin - the Ruisdael page is coming along nicely! I just noticed your edit to the reference work by Hofstede de Groot. The reason I keep referring to it as published in 1911 is because though he wrote it in German, he did write it in 1911. The English translation is from 1912, but I think historically (especially when he writes about the whereabouts of paintings) it is better to keep to his original publishing date. In this volume the lag is only one year, but in subsequent volumes the lag becomes quite large. Jane (talk) 13:31, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Ah, I see. I'll change them all back. I should figure out how to correctly say in the Bibliography that the original was in German. Thanks for helping out. Edwininlondon (talk) 20:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sorry I missed supporting this. I will add what I said - remind me if I haven't in a week or two. You could bring it back after a bit more polishing and dealing with remaining points. Johnbod (talk) 13:28, 15 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I have tried to address the remaining points, but not sure if you think it is done well enough:

• tonal - classical: I added something in the Legacy section. Do you think that is sufficient?
• prices: so far I have added one bit, at the end of the Life section, in the bit about dispelling the myth of dying poor. I found a good source for comparative prices.
• landscape status: I have added something about general popularity of landscape, great graph here in Jager 2015, http://www.jhna.org/images/pdfs/angela-jager.pdf, and I think that fits well in the Life section, when talking about him starting painting, what do you think? In any case, I am still looking for something about the low status, with history painting being of higher status.

As for other people's specific comments, I have addressed them all I believe. Just left with your suggestion to polish. I will try to get some copywriting help. Thanks. Edwininlondon (talk) 18:38, 15 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

@Johnbod: Hi Johnbod. You asked me to remind you about you adding something about low status of landscape vs history, and maybe other things you feel are still missing before I bring it back to FAC. I think I have got prices, popularity of landscapes, and tonal v classical covered. It still needs a prose polish by a native speaker, but I've got someone lined up. Thanks for your help. Edwininlondon (talk) 09:15, 29 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

OMG I can't believe you did it! Congrats and thanks for your hard work on this. Jane (talk) 13:47, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

I couldn't have done it without you, so many thanks. I hope to get it onto Today's Featured Article on March 10. BTW, I've been slowly creating pages for each of the paintings. How do I get those I did to show up as blue links on List of paintings by Jacob van Ruisdael? Or does that eventually happen automatically? As we discussed before on occasion the names don't really match, so I guess in that case it has to be done manually? Take for instance Storm Off a Sea Coast which I created. In the list it is called Ships in stormy weather off the coast. Did you link it?

I also created these:

• Bentheim Castle (Dublin) which is not in the list, can you add it?
• View of the Binnenamstel at Amsterdam, which is not linked
• View of the Dam and Damrak at Amsterdam which is not in the list
• Dune Landscape near Haarlem which is called The Thicket near Haarlem in the list, but it's not linked. Edwininlondon (talk) 15:13, 6 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! But first of all, let me just say I am perfectly happy with you taking full credit for the FA status, since I lost complete faith in that FA process years ago. I also think you are awesome for doing these painting articles, and I only just noticed. I understand the problem you are having with Wikidata and so I hope I have fixed it by adding the Q numbers inline to the List of paintings by Jacob van Ruisdael. Now you can look up the image by the date it was created, and then click the Q number which will take you straight to Wikidata for that image and there you can add in the Wikipedia article name link yourself. While there, try clicking on the Resonator link in the left menu to see the information in a better format and feel free to update the English label or any other language label if you have other languages set in your preferences. I try to include the label used by museums if at all possible, even when this is just "Landscape", but I personally think it is more useful to use a label more like a Wikipedia article title (but avoid parentheses, since disambiguation is not a Wikidata thing). Jane (talk) 11:17, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Regarding TFA on March 10: you succeeded. Espresso Addict worked on this one at TFA. Let me know if you'd like to see any changes. - Dank (push to talk) 18:33, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating View of the Dam and Damrak at Amsterdam (Boymans van Beuningen), Edwininlondon!

Wikipedia editor Damibaru just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good; however, I would have the notes in one column, as it would look better. Perhaps this article should be categorized as a stub?

To reply, leave a comment on Damibaru's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:59, 10 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

A year ago, you were recipient no. 1344 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:05, 10 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for name-letter effect or "it turns out that people tend to, unknowingly, prefer letters from their own name"! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:57, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for valuable comments to improve Der 100. Psalm, now promoted to FA on the day it was mentioned on the Main page ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:43, 30 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for today's Birthday-number effect, "turns out people unknowingly prefer numbers from their birthday". I do, same day and month as Egon Schiele ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:48, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for what you did for Miriam Makeba, "a musician and activist who had a lasting impact on music and popular culture in South Africa and abroad". I use her expressive face today, her birthday, to illustrate my own singing in defiance, - DYK ... that the hymn "Jesu, meine Freude" (Jesus, my joy) by Johann Franck and Johann Crüger mentions singing in defiance of the "old dragon", death, and fear? (March 2014). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:30, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Two years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:45, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, Gerda. Edwininlondon (talk) 08:30, 10 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for today's Cooperative pulling paradigm, "on animal cognition. Will two animals pull a rope in a synchronised manner such that they both can obtain food? In reading the research I encountered quite a few interesting findings, which I hope you will enjoy as well. I'm pleased to report one of the researchers involved kindly donated his drawing of a cooperative pulling experiment with elephants." --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:37, 26 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

thank you, Gerda!Edwininlondon (talk) 20:08, 27 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Three years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:23, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Oh, time does fly, doesn't it? Edwininlondon (talk) 16:21, 10 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

yes, four --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:02, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hey there, I was wondering if you had any further comments for this FAC. I hope I addressed your previous concerns, and you have no further issues with the article being an FA :) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:10, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi Edwininlondon, thanks for all the corrections you've made to Borscht. I have a question about one of them, though. You've corrected "the Russian Navy borscht... whose defining characteristic is..." to "the defining characteristic of which is..." I'm not a native speaker of English, so I'd like to better understand the nature of the grammatical mistake I made here. I thought "whose" could refer to both personal and non-personal antecedents, being the possessive case of both "who" and "which". Is it not the case? — Kpalion^(talk) 14:08, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

I'm not a native speaker but I checked it with a native speaker who is particularly picky. It seems it is controversial, some say it is fine, others say it is not. Maybe best to avoid needless controversy by rewriting it. I'm not sure my attempt is successful. There may be better ways. By the way, thanks very much for bringing borscht to my attention. I had some just now. Delicious. The beetroot version. Edwininlondon (talk) 19:03, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Fair enough. With a little more research, I've found this dictionary usage note, which confirm the controversy.

Anyway, I'm glad you liked the soup. It's quite rewarding to know that a food article you've written makes readers hungry. — Kpalion^(talk) 07:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi, the article Belgium national football team is under review as FAC again. At the first review you raised several issues that needed to be solved. It took some time to cope with these and other comments, yet I thank you for your critical input as it helped to get the article forward. You are warmly invited to have a second look now. Regards, Kareldorado (talk) 15:53, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Good to see you have not given up and improved it. I'm very busy with my own prep for a FAC now, but will try to find time to comment on yours. Edwininlondon (talk) 07:24, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks in advance, and good luck with your own future FAC! The article on nominative determinism looks promising and well sourced. It is your decision, but I would recommend you to do serial nominations for B- , GA- and FA-status. While this is not compulsory, it assures you and the reviewers that the article is already at a very fair and a a totally decent level, respectively, before you take it to the next stage. Regards, Kareldorado (talk) 17:02, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

It is just now that I realise you already brought Jacob van Ruisdael to FA. So, you can forget what I wrote above. :) Congrats! Kareldorado (talk) 17:08, 6 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Cover Dec 17 1994 issue of New Scientist.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 19 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

This is to let you know that the nominative determinism article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 22 January 2017. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 22, 2017. Thanks! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:06, 8 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

I'm going to move the TFA date for nominative determinism out to March or April. It's because of the reference to the urologists' names in the lead -- since I picked the article there have been news articles in the US relating to Donald Trump and an alleged episode of urination; the current date would have nominative determinism running only two days after Trump is to be inaugurated. Rather than have someone decide it's a deliberate choice to run the article then, I'm going to run something else and we'll pick another day for this article. Sorry about the delay, but it won't be long till it runs. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:46, 17 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Mike Christie: Hi Mike, it seems to me there is now a continuous stream of more controversial Trump news, that it is safe to put this weakly Trump related article up as TFA. Agree? Edwininlondon (talk) 09:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yes, we should be fine now. Crisco1492 will be scheduling TFAs for March, and I'll be scheduling April, so if Crisco1492 doesn't choose it for a day in March I'll pick it for April. I see it's been added here for April 1, which would be fine with me assuming there's nothing with a strong claim to that day as an anniversary. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:22, 12 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Mike Christie: Hi Mike, do I need to do anything to get it scheduled? April 1 is fine by me.Edwininlondon (talk) 19:04, 19 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

No, nothing needs to be done -- I'll be scheduling in the next two or three days, and it will go in for April 1. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 22:25, 19 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the nudge! I didn't realise the phrase had been used in a source, I think it mostly stood out as being oddly informal, and skimming the article there didn't seem to be a huge distinction between the insides and outsides of labs (Anseel and Duyck were presumably still reading through their large data set "in a lab"). Rereading the article, though, I can see the early stuff is certainly a lot more experiment-based than I thought it was. Feel free to change it back, or to use something else that puts the focus on attempts to find supporting evidence in real-world data. (I can't think of a good way to phrase it offhand.) --McGeddon (talk) 20:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

This is to let you know that the nominative determinism article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 1 April 2017. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 1, 2017. Thanks! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 23:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Edwin, I shortened the lead for TFA purposes. I'm starting a new project today; I don't have time to explain the whole project at the moment but I want to ask a few questions before this article goes live (in 3 hours) on the Main Page. Did you have any reaction (like, dislike, makes no difference) to the following changes I made?

"The idea that people are drawn to professions that fit their name was suggested" -> "The hypothesis had been suggested"

"Sigmund Freud, who studied pleasure and whose name means joy" -> "Sigmund Freud (German for "joy"), who studied pleasure"

"a person might be named Smith or Taylor" -> "an ancestor might have been named Smith or Taylor" - Dank (push to talk) 21:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi Dank, all good! Thx Edwininlondon (talk) 21:25, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for playing along. I'm trying to write up something now, I'll run it by the TFA coords, and if they approve, I'll post the project details at WT:TFA. - Dank (push to talk) 22:06, 31 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for "A lawyer named Sue Yoo? Authors of the book The Imperial Animal called Lionel Tiger and Robin Fox" ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:45, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

I'm glad you liked it. Edwininlondon (talk) 11:38, 1 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

The article is undergoing a FAR here. Please provide comments before it is closed. Thank you.  — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 09:01, 15 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

This is to let you know that the Name-letter effect article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 5 August 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 5, 2017. Thanks! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 21:26, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for all the work you do on psychological articles, especially in getting Name letter effect to Featured Article status. I came here to give you the Psychology Barnstar, but someone else beat me to it. Cheers, MartinPoulter (talk) 12:17, 5 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

A few months ago, you left some very helpful comments on the FAN page for the article Astronomica. Unfortunately, in the middle of the nomination, I realized that I had neglected part of a peer-review, and so I withdrew the nomination. Since then, I have implemented those changes and had the article copy-edited, and today I just re-nominated the article at FAN. I was wondering if you could leave a few comments as before? I assure you that the article is much better now! Thanks!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 15:16, 15 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi Edwin, would you like to take a look at the prose at my FAC here? I think I'm this close in getting it promoted but one of the coordinators just want to be sure the prose is free from all sorts of issues. Hoping for your acceptance, SLIGHTLY^mad 09:53, 9 September 2017 (UTC) I will try to do it this week. Edwininlondon (talk) 08:08, 12 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! I wondered if you'd have time to leave some comments on my FAc above? Best regards, Cartoon network freak (talk) 20:42, 24 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello Edwin, thanks for your assistance in reviewing the Golden jackal for FAC. I appreciate the amount of time that you spent reading intently, and your comments helped to fine-tune the article. If ever I should submit another Canis article for FAC again, if we do not hear from you by Week 3 then I will give you a ping and see if you might be further available! William Harris • (talk) • 20:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

|}

Hi Ed. Don't feel obligated, but I would be honored if you review my GA nomination via WP:GAC#Film. Nice work on the birthday-number effect article btw. Cheers, Slightlymad 10:14, 31 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hey there, I remember you helping out with the review for Waiting. I was wondering if you'd be interested in taking a look at my current FAC, another Kalki Koechlin film. Let me know, thanks either way. VedantTalk 15:58, 7 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Greetings. I see on the WP:FAC page that you have done a lot of recent prose reviews. I'm looking for someone to do a simple prose review of the Carolwood Pacific Railroad article here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Carolwood Pacific Railroad/archive1. It's part of the Disney train article series, and one of those, the Walt Disney World Railroad, will be the featured article on the main page on 25 March. Over the past two months, it has successfully completed an image and source review and has five confirmed supporters, so once a prose review is done, it will be ready for promotion. Jackdude101 ^talk cont 19:25, 24 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

I will have a look. Edwininlondon (talk) 16:01, 25 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Sarastro stepped in and completed what needed to be done review-wise, so you're off the hook. Thank you for agreeing to do it regardless. Jackdude101 ^talk cont 17:16, 25 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

I now have a new FAC page for the Ford Piquette Avenue Plant article here: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ford Piquette Avenue Plant/archive1. It's a very old car factory that's remarkably preserved, and it's where the Ford Model T was created. It's a pretty significant historical site, and the fact that it has survived for over a century in its original state in the middle of Detroit (which is notorious for arson, among other crimes) is nothing short of a miracle. If you have a moment, consider doing a review of this one, please. Jackdude101 ^talk cont 15:06, 8 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for helping me with sourcing. It means a lot. Let's just go in fives and tens, and get through it all in no time. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 23:48, 10 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

The article How Democracies Die has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable book lacking in-depth, non-trivial support.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 15:32, 29 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for creating How Democracies Die, Edwininlondon!

Wikipedia editor Eddie891 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good luck in getting to FA. I'll be following closely.

To reply, leave a comment on Eddie891's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 16:44, 29 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56/archive1, do you remember? Would you support, or what would you need? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:22, 24 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

This is to let you know that the Cooperative pulling paradigm article has been scheduled as today's featured article for July 26, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/July 26, 2018, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:12, 18 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please do not be too discouraged by the comments on the FAC. I see most of your contributions have been about mathematics or other relatively non-controversial topics. Current politics requires a bit of a different approach, esp. as regards sourcing. buidhe 16:19, 2 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

• @Buidhe:Thank you, buidhe, for your kind and supportive words. I would be grateful if you could give me further guidance, as I mentioned on the FAC page.Edwininlondon (talk) 16:45, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Led By Donkeys you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SerAntoniDeMiloni -- SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 19:41, 26 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

In order to help you, you will need to tell the exact message that appears when you attempt to edit, including the IP address given. If you do not wish to give this IP address publicly, you may use WP:UTRS to give it privately(please indicate if you will do that). 331dot (talk) 08:27, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

• @331dot: Thanks 331dot for looking into this. This is what I get when I try to edit while I am logged in: "You are currently unable to edit Wikipedia. You are still able to view pages, but you are not currently able to edit, move, or create them. Editing from 84.13.176.0/21 has been blocked (disabled) by ‪Berean Hunter‬ for the following reason(s): Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this IP address or network has been used (not necessarily by you) to disrupt Wikipedia. It has been blocked from editing to prevent further abuse. Wikipedia tries to be open, but we sometimes must block IP addresses to prevent editing by abusers, vandals, or block evaders. These blocks can affect users who have done nothing wrong. If you are a legitimate user, follow the instructions below to edit despite the block. Users who are the intended target of a range block may still appeal the block." Edwininlondon (talk) 10:10, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Did you follow the "instructions below" the message? 331dot (talk) 12:33, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I think so. All it says is "Please make sure you are logged in to your account. If you are unable to edit while logged in you may request IP block exemption to bypass blocks unconnected with you that affect your editing. Post an unblock request to your user talk page." I'm logged in. Still get the message. Is there something else I need to do that should have been in these instructions? Edwininlondon (talk) 12:39, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Berean Hunter: Should this rangeblock be anon-only like the other rangeblock this editor has been editing through? --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:07, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

No, this hardblock is intentional, Jpgordon. It is an increase from where it was blocked before and the socking returned. I gave a one month IPBE to Edwininlondon in December and giving him a longer one this time.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:54, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking for a period of six months. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page Wikipedia:IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:44, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article Led By Donkeys you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Led By Donkeys for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of SerAntoniDeMiloni -- SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 17:01, 6 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi again Edwininlondon. I hope all is well. I was just checking your page and noticed that you've done quite a few GA/FA reviews. I'm currently trying to get one of my older Politics nominations, Leslie Goonewardene, to GA status. I enjoyed working with you on Led By Donkeys and would really appreciate it if you'd be interested in reviewing this. If you're busy, that's totally fine!

Best, SerAntoniDeMiloni (talk) 23:18, 23 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Edwininlondon, I wondered if you might be able to take a look at my FAC article Edward Thomas Daniell, about an English artist whose work dates from the 1830s/1840s. I've been asked by a reviewer to dig out anyone likely to be able to comment on a Fine Arts article at this level, and i found you. Any comments would be welcome! Amitchell125 (talk) 22:04, 25 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Well Amitchell125, I feel honoured to be asked, but frankly I can't claim much of expertise in the fine arts. I see your article is nearly there. If I were a native speaker I would help out with the prose, but I'm afraid I'm not. I'm sure others will help you with the last step towards FA. Good luck! Edwininlondon (talk) 10:25, 26 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Edwininlondon, just a reminder that you posted that you were going to close your review of this GA nomination on September 12, so whenever you edit on Wikipedia next, it would be great if you could do so then. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:52, 20 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hmlarson (talk) 16:08, 31 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Arsenal Women 11–1 Bristol City Women you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hmlarson -- Hmlarson (talk) 01:41, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

The article Arsenal Women 11–1 Bristol City Women you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Arsenal Women 11–1 Bristol City Women for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hmlarson -- Hmlarson (talk) 00:02, 22 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi Edwininlondon, do you have any interest in creating a list similar to this featured list, List of international goals scored by Abby Wambach, for Miedema? Hmlarson (talk) 23:19, 1 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

• @Hmlarson:I'm more into getting articles to be featured on the home page, but sure, this seems like a fine project to get sidetracked in. The hard work is done I think, building the table, right? So it just needs references for each goal and a few intro paragraphs, correct? Edwininlondon (talk) 08:20, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

• Yes. Hmlarson (talk) 17:36, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

*@Hmlarson: I have made a start: List of international goals scored by Vivianne Miedema. I will add references. Will you link to it from her article page? Edwininlondon (talk) 22:32, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

• You're awesome. Yes, we could also start a navbox now that there are 3 articles. See Template:Lionel Messi series for example. Hmlarson (talk) 23:16, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

• Take a look at how it was done on the Alex Morgan article here: Alex_Morgan#International_summary - do you want to do similar for integrating this into her main article? See also Marta's article: Marta_(footballer)#International_career They're a bit different than Abby_Wambach#International_goals. Hmlarson (talk) 23:33, 2 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:01, 4 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi, can you please leave your final comments on the nom? It's been stuck for a long time now. Thank you. Yashthepunisher (talk) 05:01, 18 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Arsenal Women 11–1 Bristol City Women has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the FAN.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 19:40, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks very much for doing this! It is a lot cleaner now. Much appreciated. Edwininlondon (talk) 21:20, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vivianne Miedema, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ellen White.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi. There should be no problem. I checked back on that article and it was moved to draft because the person who originally created it hadn't included any references. Then he/she never bothered to work on it any more so it was deleted after being in draft for six months and never submitted for review. What you've done so far looks fine; you should just submit the draft for review and it will be moved to article space, so the red link will turn blue. Deb (talk) 09:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the delay in fixing Ruth Cupp. I believe it is all fixed now. I understand it failing GA review so that's ok. Happy to nominate it again. I just don't know what the proper thing to do right now (e.g., do I need to wait a period of time before renominating? Do I clear things with you before renominating?). So any insights you can provide on what the next steps should be would be most appreciated. Thank you again for taking the time to review and help the article! I really appreciated it! Cheers! Remember (talk) 11:59, 9 March 2021 (UTC) @Remember: I don't see any reason for this nomination to fail. I think we're nearly there. I just need to investigate the name of the article a bit more, just making we get it right now. I will get back to you soon. Edwininlondon (talk) 17:29, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:26, 10 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you today for Arsenal Women 11–1 Bristol City Women! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:53, 22 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

... and today thank you and the team for [[Manon Melis}}, introduced: "I nominate another football article. For nine years Manon Melis was the all-time top scorer for her country's national women's football team. She retired from professional football just before her national team won their first and only tournament in 2017."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:49, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your kind words, Gerda. Edwininlondon (talk) 21:23, 2 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Manon Melis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 03:20, 18 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

The article Manon Melis you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Manon Melis for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 08:41, 26 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi Edwininlondon - might you have any interest in building a list article for FA Women's Super League Golden Boot similar to Premier League Golden Boot? A basic list is available at The FA Women's Football Awards Hmlarson (talk) 01:34, 27 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Looks like it already exists: FA WSL Golden Boot. But we can make it better and even nominate it for Featured List? Edwininlondon (talk) 07:39, 28 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

The article Manon Melis you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Manon Melis for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sportsfan77777 -- Sportsfan77777 (talk) 08:01, 6 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Edwin -just a small reminder, we are at Day 11 of the Review, I pinged you several times, is anything missing? CommanderWaterford (talk) 07:20, 19 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Margery Wolf, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ƒirefly ( t · c ) 10:17, 21 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 22 August, 2021. Please check that the article needs no amendments. A coordinator will draft a blurb - based on your draft if the TFA came via TFA requests, or from an existing blurb on the FAC talk page if one has been posted. Feel free to comment on this. We suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 15:35, 5 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello Edwininlondon -- With the goal of helping to progress the WikiProject Women in Green (WiG) women’s rights-themed GA nomination goal for 2021, I’m proposing that WiG hold a special editathon event in the fall (maybe October/November?). I can assist with logistics, but I need to know how much interest/support there might be from WiG participants first. Please let me know what you think in the talk page conversation! All the best, Alanna the Brave (talk) 01:57, 20 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello:

The copy edit you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article [[]] has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Best of luck with the FAC when you get to it.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 15:21, 21 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks very much for improving it, @Twofingered Typist:, much appreciated! I will put it up at FAC now. Edwininlondon (talk) 06:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Edwininlondon! Hope things are good across the pond. Would you care to do a FAC review for Manganese, Minnesota? I don't know if it's Wiki-appropriate to recruit reviewers, but you have reviewed articles I have written before, and the FAC coordinators are suggesting this article may be archived if no other reviewers step up to the plate. Thanks! DrGregMN (talk) 15:10, 11 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Led By Donkeys, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Communication Workers Union and The National.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 16 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi Edwin, just wondering if I can be cheeky enough to ask for a review at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/1987 Football League Third Division play-off Final/archive1? It's a co-nomination so there are two of us (me and ChrisTheDude) working on it and it'd be great to get some different perspectives on it. I know I owe you a review on Manon Melis which I intend to get to later. Anyway, all the best, and keep making great content. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 20:28, 10 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi Edwininlondon! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 17:10, Wednesday, November 10, 2021 (UTC)

@Edwininlondon: Greetings! I usually go through FAs to check for issues and address them to the respective nominators. One of your FAs has a CN-tag; could you take care of it? Cheers. Wretchskull (talk) 13:49, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

@Wretchskull: Thank you for alerting me. I have dealt with it. Edwininlondon (talk) 09:00, 12 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Corry Tendeloo you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 12:41, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

The article Corry Tendeloo you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Corry Tendeloo for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 17:41, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

The article Corry Tendeloo you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Corry Tendeloo for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Vacant0 -- Vacant0 (talk) 11:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Inequity aversion in animals you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 21:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

The article Inequity aversion in animals you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Inequity aversion in animals for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 19:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

The article Inequity aversion in animals you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Inequity aversion in animals for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 17:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

New York (where I live) has had 3 snowstorms / blizzards this month, which have prevented me from getting to a library with better Wi-Fi connection or computers than I have here. Ironic, I guess. But I have found pdfs of her work that can go into the article, so I'm still working on it behind the scenes. Trillfendi (talk) 16:53, 31 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry to hear about your troubles. Hopefully Spring comes soon. I am happy to help out with the article, just let me know. Best Edwininlondon (talk) 17:54, 31 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Edwin, hope you are well!

I've got another FAC up here, which seems to only be lacking a source review at this point. You've been kind enough to source review some of my other recent FACs and I was wondering if you might have time to look at this one? Not to worry if not. Of course, if you also wished to do a complete review, that would be great!

All the best! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:55, 9 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi Edwin, hope you are well. If you fancy reviewing yet another season article, I have another one up now :-)

All the best, ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:51, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:02, 21 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Betsy Bakker-Nort you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Johannes Schade -- Johannes Schade (talk) 11:21, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

The article Betsy Bakker-Nort you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Betsy Bakker-Nort for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Johannes Schade -- Johannes Schade (talk) 07:41, 23 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

Dear Edwininlondon. You indicated at the end of the GA for Betsy that you would be ready to review a nomination of mine. I have nominated Charles MacCarthy, 1st Viscount of Muskerry for GA. You will find it under Royalty, Nobility and Heraldry. I would be very pleased if you could have a look and review it if it is not too off-putting or too far from your expertise for you to take on (I would understand this). With many thanks, Johannes Schade (talk) 07:46, 15 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hey, how's it going? I see you've reviewed football-related articles for FA in recent years. A.C. Monza has been a candidate for over three weeks, and there are almost no comments. I would really appreciate it if you took some time to leave a comment (it doesn't necessarily have to be a full review) :) Nehme₁₄₉₉ 21:09, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Just in case you have pings disabled. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:15, 20 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Dear Edwininlondon. Thank you so much for your GA review of Charles MacCarthy, 1st Viscount Muskerry. This is only my second GA. Please do not hesitate to call on me if there is anything I can help you with. Best regards, Johannes Schade (talk) 05:30, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

You kindly commented in a FAC Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56 back in 2018 - we are now in the next round, and I'd appreciate your input now. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:39, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sure, no problem! I will in the next few days. Edwininlondon (talk) 21:45, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

thank you for helping! - new pics and thoughts on 13 August --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:55, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Look at the church where I heard VOCES8. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:31, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your comments that made the cantata a featured article! - images of a rich summer, especially in music --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:14, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you today for Corry Tendeloo, introduced: "I promised my daughter to get more bios of women on WP, so here's an article about a Dutch politician from the 1940s & 50s, who was active in the women's rights movement." A great reason! Congratulations to the next promotion! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:34, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Every small step helps. Edwininlondon (talk) 12:49, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Saw that you reviewed another FAC recently. Would you be so kind as to offer a review for this article? Wikipedia:Featured_article_candidates/Texas_A&M_University/archive3? Buffs (talk) 16:43, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, no time for WP at the moment. Edwininlondon (talk) 22:33, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Understood. Thanks! Buffs (talk) 23:19, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:35, 25 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 21 November 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/November 21, 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/November 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 14:55, 11 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Excellent article! I enjoyed reading it and learned a lot. Thanks for creating it and getting it to this exalted status. :) —Ganesha811 (talk) 00:08, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Congrats, and thank you for reviewing Ich will den Kreuzstab gerne tragen, BWV 56! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:27, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thank you today for Betsy Bakker-Nort, introduced: "Following the successful nomination of post-war Dutch parliamentarian Corry Tendeloo a few months ago, I started the article about her pre-war predecessor, another women's rights fighter largely forgotten these days."! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:27, 21 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Pinging you since you did comment on the second FAC, in case you have suggestions for resolving the issues noted there. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:02, 2 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

—Ganesha811 (talk) 15:36, 24 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sorry that I forgot to update, but thanks for updating. Jishiboka1 (talk) 05:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:50, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thank you, Gerda. To celebrate I shall try to visit a gallery and see a Ruisdael this weekend. Edwininlondon (talk) 07:36, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

lovely idea! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:48, 10 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I nominated Li Rui for FA status, but the review is now at risk of being archived because there have not been many comments. Would you be willing to jump in and share your thoughts on the article? You previously were a GA reviewer for one of my other two FAs (Mary Jane Richardson Jones), which I really appreciated. Thank you! —Ganesha811 (talk) 14:08, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

I don't want the FAC page to degenerate into some unnecessary back-and-forth, so I'll just clarify here in response to Special:Diff/1149906863: in case you were under some other impression, I am another reviewer, not the nominator. I would expect reviewers of my nominations to either quote an FA criterion/policy/guideline if challenged on a particular comment or drop the comment. As it's not my nomination, however, I won't press any further. — Bilorv (talk) 10:08, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of top international women's football goal scorers by country, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:04, 31 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of top international women's football goal scorers by country, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:22, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Greetings Edwininlondon,

When updating this list please remember that the sequence is Caps, Last Cap and First Cap.

Can you correct your latest updates?

Thank you.

Rklingmann (talk) 16:23, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

• @Rklingmann: Happy to make corrections, but sorry, I'm not sure what you want me to do. Are you talking about a specific row order, where if number of caps is equal there is a secondary sort order involving dates?Edwininlondon (talk) 18:40, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  @Edwininlondon, Yes, that is what I'm talking about. ie. Beerensteyn should be at the bottom of the "102 Caps" group. Rklingmann (talk) 21:05, 2 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for fixing the Dutch entries. Rklingmann (talk) 23:07, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:33, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi user Gdfctjmm (talk) 19:23, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hey, thanks for all your efforts reviewing good article nominations! Just a reminder to list the article at the Good Articles page once you're done, too. I often use this script which stops me from missing a step! Adabow (talk) 00:35, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:21, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply