Lado85

  Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! SimplyLouis27 (talk) 13:03, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Star Trek, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not edit war. The divisions for films and series across the Star Trek articles have been determined through talk page discussion and should not be changed without further talks. adamstom97 (talk) 08:48, 5 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi Lado85, Good day. Understand your intention; however, the UFC ranking article does not pass GNG notability requirement that is the reason of my revert. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 19:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Why doesn't it pass GNG notability requirement? Lado85 (talk) 19:57, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

All articles in Wikipedia main space need to pass notability guidelines and if not, any editor can nominate the article for deletion. Cassiopeia talk 20:42, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply