Picapica

Hallo!

Ich schreibe auf dieser Seite, denn ich bemerkt habe, dass Sie sind auf deiner Deutsche Seite nicht mehr aktiv.

Ich kenne, dass Sie auf Walisisch gut sprechen können, deshalb ich bitte um Hilfe. Ich brauche nur einige Texte aus den Walisischen Liedern schreiben (leider Ich spreche völlig kein Walisisch; die Lieder, aus den ich Texte brauche, sind nicht lange). Würdest du mir helfen?

Vielen Dank! Eniisi Lisika (talk) 15:06, 4 June 2018 (UTC) EniisiReply

Gerne. Mailen Sie mir einfach! -- Picapica (talk) 21:18, 4 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ich konnte deinen E-mail auf der Seite nicht finden, deshalb ich da die Lieder verlassen werde (die Lieder sind aus den alten Karikaturen): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWupra-6GH0 und https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wWVFzFrO0R8 Senden Sie die Texten zu baasakroto@gmail.com Vielen Dank! Eniisi Lisika (talk) 22:27, 4 June 2018 (UTC) Eniisi "der Adler"Reply

Have replied to your email address. -- Picapica (talk) 10:13, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Ich wartete auf eine e-mail von dir, aber ich habe es nicht bekommen, deshalb wieder screibe ich. Wollen Sie über meiner Sprache etwas schreiben oder fragen, bitte machen Sie das! :) Entschuldigung, wenn ich bin zu eifrig und habe nicht genug gewartet. Eniisi Lisika (talk) 17:52, 23 June 2018 (UTC) EniisiReply

Eniisi, entschuldige bitte die Verspätung. Ich arbeite seit ein paar Tagen an der Phonologie deiner Sprache (wie du es auf deiner Webseite dargestellt hast) und werde mich bald diesbezüglich mit dir in Verbindung setzen. -- Picapica (talk) 06:21, 24 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Vielen Dank! Ich schätze es wirklich sehr! Wenn Sie wollen, Sie können die Seite über der Sprache ergänzen und verändern. Es würde größe Hilfe für mich sein. Eniisi Lisika (talk) 12:39, 24 June 2018 (UTC) EniisiReply

Hi; I agreed with your point (made in 2017) about the Alcester branch not being an Alcester to Hatton line. As I sometimes get trolled over this kind of thing, I wonder if you would be prepared to make the change? I will add some material to the page afterwards. Alcester–Hatton branch line

While I'm here:

1) Impressive language capability. I find the celtic languages quite hard work. My favourite recent discovery is the Italian for corkscrew; "cavatappi". Nice word.

2) You say start a new section by pressing the + sign next to "edit this page". Couldn't find it. --Afterbrunel (talk) 09:38, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thanks for the reminder, and the support for my point of view! I've put it on my "to do" list (and will look at it soonest: tonight, if possible).

Yes, you're right about the lack of the + sign. It used to be there (and still is in the German Wikipedia for example) but the English Wp has clearly "evolved" while I wasn't looking. I'll change the wording now. -- Picapica (talk) 09:59, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your work. Afterbrunel (talk) 12:45, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Please STOP making unreferenced changes that go against consensus. Useddenim (talk) 22:57, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

This kind of question-begging reminds me so much of "Have you stopped beating your wife?" :) -- Picapica (talk) 23:17, 17 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

So how is your wife feeling, these days? 8D Useddenim (talk) 00:24, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Oh, you know: usual method, the old tactile faculty? Still can't be beaten. -- Picapica (talk) 12:27, 18 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

Earlier this year you commented on the origin of the name Flint (Flintshire). I'm a new editor I've put some detailed information on the matter in the talk page, (I'm a little frustrated by someone who appears to me to be acting a little unreasonably) i believe the sources I've referenced are indeed secondary/tertiary sources discussing the subject matter directly ( even the reference to the Calendar of the Chancelory Roll I'm calling on the commentary of the compiler as published in 1914) and there's 5 of them! In any case my intention is not to publish those points but discredit the original source and thus remove it from the page. Even if it is prevalent it surely can't be right it's included unchallenged if it can be obviously disproven? Surely wikipedia isn't a place for known misinformation? I feel I don't have the resources or experience to compete for this, so perhaps I may ask for you to share your opinion on the matter?

Kind Regards

Gareth Gar P Young (talk) 21:51, 17 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Nsb next long-distance has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:44, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply