Saimcheeda

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Mathias Point Light has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \bfacebook\.com (links: http://www.facebook.com/home.php?#/profile.php?id=100000021061697&ref=profile).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:38, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

...but nothing you contribute is going to survive unless you take to heart the need to provide proper citations and avoid vandalism. Mangoe (talk) 15:08, 22 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Saim Cheeda is a Pakistani boy currently residing in Muscat, Oman which is also his birthplace. Saim is attending College of Banking and Financial Studies. In addition to his daily lifestyle Saim is also a Cricket fan and an avid gamer. He frequently offers his own reviews on various websites.

It's never going to work.^{--UnquestionableTruth--} 00:40, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

HellO! Your edits on June 13 to Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker introduced two ref names, "IGN" and "Edge" (in the reviews) without actually adding the source(s). Would you please revisit the article and include the sources you intended? Thanks. - Salamurai (talk) 17:54, 13 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Money in the Bank ladder match. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Do not remove external links, categories, and inter-wiki links from articles. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 12:55, 1 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

•   You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on WrestleMania XXV. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. ^{--UnquestionableTruth--} 04:38, 4 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from List of WWE pay-per-view events. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Steam Iron 20:47, 10 June 2010 (UTC)   Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: WrestleMania XXV. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 12:48, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on WrestleMania XXV. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Stop edit-warring on this article. I've lost track of the number of editors and ips you';ve reverted without explanation. I'm tired of pointing out in my edit summaries that the name parameter in the infobox (i.e. where it says |name = ) is for the name of the article. The article is called WrestleMania XXV, therefore the infobox reads WrestleMania XXV. End of story. Stop edit-warring or you will get blocked. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 19:54, 19 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to WrestleMania XXVII, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You seem to be vandalizing this article as well as many others if you do this again you WILL BE BLOCKED! Curtis23's Usalions 03:47, 28 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have reported you for continuous edit warring you can defend yourself here [1].

—slakr^\ talk / 04:39, 28 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Saim, i see that you have nominated yourself for adminship. I urge you to immediately withdraw. You have made only 345 edits in wikipedia; in recent years no-one with less than 2,000 edits has succeeded, and most have well over 3,000. You also need to have broad experience in admin-related tasks, and you have not. I suggest that you cancel your submission and spend a few months gaining wikipedia experience; then try again. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 16:44, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

In fact I now see that you have not properly transcluded your application, so it does not in fact show on the WP:RfA page. I suggest that for the present you leave things as they are and, as I said above, gather some wikipedia experience. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 16:49, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Concur with Anthony.bradbury. You should withdraw. You are not going to be successful with so few edits, and the blocks and edit warring warnings are no help. When you are ready someone will nominate you. --220.101 (talk) ^\Contribs 16:58, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

I agree with all the above. You currently have zero chance of becoming an admin, so save yourself any heartache and have a read of WP:NOTNOW. Get a good year or so of article-building under your belt, with a good few thousand edits, and no edit-warring or blocks, and then think about it again. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. A lack of civility; edit warring and blocks only demonstrate a lack of experience and possibly even immaturity (to judge by the desire to edit wrestling and video game pages. That's how an objective assessor may see it at any rate). Avoid the humiliation. 125.63.185.205 (talk) 04:43, 7 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hi Saimcheeda. I noticed you created a Requests for Adminship page some time ago; I was wondering as to what the status of that request might be. I think it's fair to warn you that new users are rarely successful at RfA and that the Wikipedia editing community sets very high standards for editors running for adminship. That being said, I strongly urge you to read WP:GRFA, User:Davidwr/Administration is not for new users, and WP:NOTNOW, and ask you to reconsider whether you really do wish to go through with your candidacy; please understand that you stand very little to no chance of passing RfA at this point and that you are strongly discouraged from running for adminship. If you are still intent on running for adminship with that RfA and are absolutely positive this is what you want, please do let me know; otherwise, I'll go ahead and delete the RfA page for you in about a week or so from today. Regards, FASTILY ^(TALK) 07:16, 10 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:DSC02828.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:06, 17 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Please familiarise yourself with the contents of Wikipedia:Image use policy before uploading any further images. Wikipedia takes copyright infringement very seriously and uploading non-free images is strongly discouraged. You may find that if you continue to repeatedly infringe the guidelines you may find yourself blocked by an administrator. 21st CENTURY GREENSTUFF 14:56, 23 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Matt-leblanc-1.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:06, 23 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:179627 140684589326695 100001554640777 253372 6796417 n.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:08, 23 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:HOW-I-MET-YOUR-MOTHER-Challenge-Accepted-Season-6-Episode-24-7 595.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:08, 23 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:179627 140684589326695 100001554640777 253372 6796417 n.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Alpha Quadrant ^talk 21:55, 24 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:45, 27 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:37737 404918494425 513329425 4507479 4399564 n.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:05, 27 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Cena2011.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:46, 5 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi there.

What's with this and this edit? I could understand you changing all instances of "primary" to "main", or vice versa, but I don't understand why you've flipped them round in each case? That's hardly consistent. a_man_alone (talk) 12:23, 5 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Saim Cheeda, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It appears to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do, and take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
• It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. CyanGardevoir ^{(used EDIT!)} 23:59, 23 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at WP:Featured articles. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 22:09, 29 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pakistan national cricket team, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abdul Razzaq (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:06, 5 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at India–Pakistan cricket rivalry. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. SMS ^Talk 06:20, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Saimcheeda, and thank you for your contributions!

Some text in an article that you worked on Pakistani cricket team in India in 2012-13, appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, Pakistani cricket team in India in 2012–13. Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Pakistani cricket team in India in 2012-13 at any time. MadmanBot (talk) 15:20, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello Saimcheeda, and welcome to Wikipedia. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied without attribution. If you want to copy from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Davejohnsan (talk) 18:49, 14 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Misha Collins, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whose Line is it Anyway?. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Age of Enlightenment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Epoch. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 2 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Hello Saimcheeda, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Kal Ho Naa Ho has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:10, 26 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lootera, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romance. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:37737 404918494425 513329425 4507479 4399564 n.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 17:42, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Robert Downey Jr. filmography. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Please refrain from using rowspans in actors filmographies per WP:ACCESSABILITY LADY LOTUS • TALK 20:25, 9 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Got married with Anushka Sharma Congratulations Bhaijaan Rjhardik (talk) 18:37, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Wonder (film). Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:41, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to The Dubai Mall; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. UA3 (talk) 21:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I apprecitate if you don't remove the sentence from Velveteen Dream article. Even if WWE only counts one of the events (in-universe), it's something that happened and it's sourced (real life and fact). Just like The Rockers title reign --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:24, 11 February 2019 (UTC)Reply