Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Himanshi Khurana

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Bharatiya29 (talk) 11:48, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Himanshi Khurana

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most sources are unreliable. The Amazing Spiderman (talk) 08:19, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep 1. Himanshi Khurana is a famous model, actor and people use keyword 'Himanshi Khurana wiki' to find her. 2. Music videos featuring her have got 40,853,000+ views on YouTube. 3. She has worked in Punjabi movies including Sadda Haq, Leather Life, 2 Bol. 4. She is becoming more and more famous day by day. She has also worked for companies like Makemytrip, Ayur, Pepsi, Nestle, Gitanjali Jewellers, Big Bazaar, Kingfisher, Calvin Klein et. Kavindeep (talk) 08:49, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now. The wikipedia article is mostly cited to another wiki fansite and her film roles to date do not appear to be major. She's scheduled to be the female lead in a new film coming out later this month and, if she gets significant coverage on the back of this, her notability may change. Sionk (talk) 09:12, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: the Times of India reference appears to little more than a press release: it is taken word for word from here. I also note that the source, "PunjabUpFilms", has no Wikipedia article. This appears to me anomalous, given the extensive coverage of Indian cinema on Wikipedia. --Shirt58 (talk) 09:49, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawing my nomination She has acted in Punjabi movies. Punjabi movie actresses are not given much coverage in mainstream Indian English newspapers. The Amazing Spiderman (talk) 09:58, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Bharatiya29 (talk) 09:54, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think what matters is not PunjabUpFilms, what matters is that the article was published on Times of India after proper verification of the matter. She is a news personality. Maybe she has not much articles in Mainstream newspapers but there are a lots of articles and interviews of Himanshi Khurana on many India level websites. So I think this article fits the criteria to be on Wikipedia. Kindly think once again and I'm sure you will find that this article should not be deleted. Kavindeep (talk) 10:52, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.