Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plonk (Usenet)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 22:00, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Plonk (Usenet) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This belongs in a dictionary. There are no usable sources that treat this word as anything more than a dictionary term. None of the used sources look reliable, either. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 19:31, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 19:31, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Support for the reasons given. Lovely word, but not a topic for a wikipedia article. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 14:28, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my talk page 15:47, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.