Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Specific humidity capacity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Elli (talk | contribs) 18:23, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Specific humidity capacity (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed during NPP. Appears to be just seeking to create/post a neologism for certain aspects of existing thermodynamic principles. A search revealed only two hits on the term, both twitter posts by the same person who is an author of a paper which is the only reference for this article. North8000 (talk) 18:00, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science, Environment, and Mathematics. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:04, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I can find a passing mention: [1], but that's a primary source mostly about another subject. If by some stretch this concept has a secondary summary somewhere, the article needs to be shredded and rewritten from scratch, since it's impenetrably technical. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:40, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete From reading the single source quoted, which appears to be the definition, notability is very questionable. It is only part of that paper, not key, and while it is not unrigorous it is certainly WP:TOO SOON. It can only survive if rewritten, as mentioned above.Ldm1954 (talk) 13:39, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a WP:NEOLOGISM as mentioned above. I tried going down the route of looking for possible redirect targets, but none look useful here either, so deletion seems most reasonable here. KoA (talk) 17:23, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as a neologism that has yet to become an established technical term of documentable significance. XOR'easter (talk) 17:18, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.