The Wollaston disaster was a railroad accident that occurred on October 8, 1878, in the Wollaston neighborhood of Quincy, Massachusetts. 19 people were killed and 170 were injured when an incorrectly placed switch caused the derailment of an excursion train returning from a sporting event. The conductor who placed the switch was convicted of manslaughter, but the conviction was overturned on appeal.
 Headline in the Boston Evening Transcript | |
| Date | October 8, 1878 |
|---|---|
| Time | 7:30 pm |
| Location | Wollaston, Quincy, Massachusetts |
| Coordinates | 42°16′18″N 71°01′33″W / 42.27167°N 71.02583°W |
| Cause | Incorrectly placed railroad switch |
| Deaths | 19 |
| Non-fatal injuries | 170 |
| Convicted | Charles H. Hartwell |
| Charges | Manslaughter |
| Verdict | Guilty (overturned on appeal) |
Silver Lake special
editA special train had been prepared for spectators returning from the well-attended Reagan-Davis sculling race on October 8, 1878 on Silver Lake in Plympton, Massachusetts.[1] The train was made up of two locomotives, a baggage car where the racing shells were stored, a compartment coach where race officials, journalists, and one of the principals of the race, Patrick Reagan, were seated, and twenty passenger cars.[2] In total the special contained 1,600 to 1,800 passengers.[1] The train was not running on a set schedule and, as was traditional with late-running special trains, a notice was sent to railroad employees giving the train the right-of-way after 4 pm.[3] It did not depart Silver Lake until around 6:30 pm.[2]
Newport freight train
editAt 6:30 pm, the regularly scheduled Newport local freight train departed Boston. The train, which consisted of an engine and 15 freight cars, was short-staffed as one of the brakemen had gone home sick earlier that day. It was against the rules of the road for the train to go out; however, the conductor, Charles H. Hartwell, incorrectly assumed that the Silver Lake special had already reached Boston and he was not informed to the contrary. He was instructed to pick up five empty flat cars from the Wollaston Foundry siding.[3] When the train reached the foundry, two switches were opened in order to move the cars across the outward track to the inward track, and the train was divided to place them in the center.[4]
Accident
editAt around 7:30 pm, the excursion train was seen approaching on the inward track.[4] The freight train's engineer was able to move his engine and all of the cars attached to it out of the way, but there was not enough time to close the switches.[3][4] With both switches set wrong, the special should have stayed on the rails and stopped on the siding. However, one of the switches was out of line, causing the special to strike the end of the rail and derail.[3]
Several of the excursion train's cars telescoped, the compartment car was smashed, and three or four cars mounted on top of each other.[1] The two locomotives, baggage car, compartment car, and four passenger cars came off the track.[3] The cylinder of the second locomotive entered the side of the compartment car, killing all but one of its occupants.[5] A total of 17 passengers and two railroad employees died and 166 passengers and 4 railroad employees were injured.[6]
Investigation and trial
editThe Massachusetts Railroad Commission's investigation into the accident found the engineer and conductor of the freight train to be "guilty of gross and criminal negligence" and called for the arrest of the conductor, Hartwell.[3] On October 11, 1878, Massachusetts Attorney General Charles R. Train had Hartwell arrested. Hartwell claimed that he had received written orders from his superior to act in the manner he did when the accident occurred.[7] The following day he was arraigned on the charge of manslaughter and held on $10,000 ($315,724 in 2023) bail.[8]
The inquest began on October 16[9] and concluded the following day. Hartwell admitted that he had not placed warning flags as required. His attorney blamed the accident on the Newport train's headlight, which prevented the engineer of the excursion train from seeing the switch and danger signals until it was only a few hundred feet away.[10] Hartwell was found guilty of gross negligence for running short-staffed and not notifying his managers, allowing his train to stand on the outward track unsignalled, directing his engine to occupy the inward track, and causing the switches to be changed and remain unlocked without leaving the inward track signalled. The engineer of the freight train, Charles H. Hurlburt, was found to be negligent for occupying the inward track without a signal. As for the excursion train, the investigating judge concluded that Charles Westgate should not have been engineer of the lead locomotive due to his inexperience with the road. Lastly he criticized the lack of communication, stating that if either the freight train or excursion train had been notified of the other's presence, the accident would have been avoided.[11]
Hartwell was tried for manslaughter in the Norfolk County Superior Court beginning on April 22, 1879.[12] On April 24 the jury found him guilty after one hour of deliberation. According to The New York Times, the jurors "would have liked to return a different verdict, but it was impossible" based on the instructions given by the judge. The Times also noted that "the public sympathy for Hartwell appears to be very general and the feeling that he is made a scapegoat is wide-spread".[13]
On February 27, 1880, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court overturned the verdict, holding that the lower court had erred by not requiring the prosecution to prove that Hartwell knew that the arrival of the excursion train was imminent, and that there was no evidence to prove this allegation.[14]
See also
editReferences
edit- ^ a b c "Terrific Railroad Crash; An Excursion Train Wrecked Near Boston". The New York Times. October 9, 1878.
- ^ a b "Terrible Railway Disaster: Excursion Train on Old Colony Railroad thrown from Track". The New England Farmer, and Horticultural Register. October 12, 1878.
- ^ a b c d e f Annual Report of the Board of Railroad Commissioners. Vol. 10. Boston. 1879. pp. 37–49.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ a b c "The Wollaston Disaster; Responsibility For The Loss Of Life". The New York Times. October 10, 1878.
- ^ "DESOLATION.: Heartrending Story. Terrible Accident at Wollaston". The Boston Daily Globe. October 9, 1878.
- ^ Annual Report of the Board of Railroad Commissioners. Vol. 11. Boston. 1880. pp. 186–187.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link) - ^ "Conductor Hartwell Arrested for Manslaughter". The Boston Daily Globe. October 12, 1878.
- ^ "The Wollaston Disaster". The New York Times. October 13, 1878.
- ^ "Wollaston: The Official Investigation Begun". The Boston Daily Globe. October 17, 1878.
- ^ "The Wollaston Disaster; Plea Upon Which Conductor Hartwell's Discharge Is Asked Theory Of The Defense". The New York Times. October 18, 1878.
- ^ "The Wollaston Verdict: Hartwell Found Guilty of Gross Negligence--Engineers Westgate and Hurlburt Censured". The Boston Daily Globe. October 26, 1878.
- ^ "The Wollaston Disaster: Charles H. Hartwell Arraigned for Manslaughter". The Boston Daily Globe. April 23, 1879.
- ^ "Hartwell Found Guilty; The Responsibility For The Wollaston Disaster Placed On The Conductor". The New York Times. April 25, 1879.
- ^ "Legal Department: Manslaughter—Liability of Conductor". The Boston Traveller. March 13, 1880 [February 28, 1880] – via Railway World.; "The Case of the Old Colony Conductor". The Boston Traveller. March 1, 1880 [February 28, 1880] – via The New York Times.