Talk:Attic Lights

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pop music This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Attic Lights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/entertainment/music/music-news/2008/01/04/attic-on-track-to-be-leading-lights-86908-20273866/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/entertainment/music/music-news/2007/12/28/viva-glasvegas-86908-20266935/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.the-mag.me.uk/Articles/Attic-Lights-Live-20060120/
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.theherald.co.uk/features/features/display.var.1948434.0.Futures_bright_for_Attic_Lights.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080917201530/http://channelbee.com:80/move/music/live-archive/atticlights to http://channelbee.com/move/music/live-archive/atticlights#300

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:20, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There are 14 entries in the "External links" in an extra "Reviews" section and five subsections. Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.

• ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
• LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
• WP:ELMIN: Minimize the number of links.

Trim excessive links and remove the 2013 maintenance tag. -- Otr500 (talk) 15:16, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]