Talk:Bali Peace Park

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia Bali Peace Park is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

This article was originally pasted up as one big unwikified article, with some links to articles about a dispute. I split what was there to a history section, and added an intro. But I get the impression that only one point of view is being expressed here, and the creator's account name suggests a WP:Conflict of interest. Could someone familiar with the subject please check it and edit for WP:NPOV? Thanks, Empty Buffer (talk) 10:15, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've had to delete big chunks from that history section, since it was mostly unreferenced, and most of the references given were from blogs and forums, and many of them didn't support the text for which they were cited. Apparently there has been some sort of disagreement over how to build the park, and I've noted this with two refs from WP:Reliable sources. Empty Buffer (talk) 08:20, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 09:40, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bali Peace Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110213081921/http://www.bali-tourism-board.com/news/513-disallow-development-clubbing-place-in-ex-sari-club.html to http://www.bali-tourism-board.com/news/513-disallow-development-clubbing-place-in-ex-sari-club.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:14, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Constant edits reflect personal vendetta by author, therefore an unreliable and inaccurate source of information. 167.179.185.197 (talk) 11:43, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to bring the whole article back in line with the overall idea of having a peace park at the Sari nightclub site, since that matches the title and most of the article. I did my best to sort out what was the Peace Park Association and what was the Peace Park Project, but a quick search didn't turn up a lot of information on what actually happened to the Association after they stopped trying to buy the land (except for the Project's website/blog, which is kind of by definition unreliable, since the founder of the Project was expelled from the Association and is quoted in one article as saying he'd rather face a firing squad than stand with the Association).

Could definitely still use some work, though, if anyone has better luck with finding sources for the actual outcome of Dallas Finn's offer (which, again, I could only source to his blog) or what happened to the Association. EasyAsPai (talk) 04:06, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]