Talk:Day of the Daleks

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Doctor Who Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Television: Episode coverage This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[List of fictional elements, materials, isotopes and subatomic particles#Dalekanium|dalekanium]] The anchor (#Dalekanium) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

The "Broadcast..." section states, "This is the earliest Doctor Who story to survive entirely on its original 625-line PAL videotape." However, there is no indication in the article for Colony in Space that it does not similarly survive. Which needs to be revised? Ted Watson (talk) 17:09, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Colony - it survives only as a 525 line transfer. Timrollpickering (talk) 14:50, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was a while ago and my memory may be playing tricks, but I thought the fictional explosive was "dalektite". I note that "dalekanium" is another substance referred to elsewhere in Doctor Who, so is it possible somebody else is getting confused? PatGallacher (talk) 01:51, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, it's the same word used for something different. Timrollpickering (talk) 14:48, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Day of the Daleks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gallifreyone.com/episode.php?id=3k
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081222000426/http://www.drwhoguide.com:80/who_3k.htm to http://www.drwhoguide.com/who_3k.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]