Talk:Lee Newton

There is a request, submitted by Soulboost (talk), for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: "article is about a notable news host and person in maxim's magazine.".

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 May 2012. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Arts and Entertainment This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group. Comedy This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Internet culture This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Internet culture To-do: edit history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles Expand : Pick an article from here or here Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images Stubs : All stubs are located here Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}} See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention Oregon Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical). YouTube Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject YouTube To-do: edit history watch purge A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : see list. Assess : Apply the assessment scale on Unknown-importance YouTube articles + Unassessed YouTube articles Cleanup : See cleanup listing Maintain : This WikiProject Stubs : Category:Stub-Class YouTube articles Other : Substitute {{WikiProject YouTube/Invite Members}} on user talk pages Check out edit requests on Talk:List of YouTubers

I personally see no reason for this article to be marked for deletion. 86.147.174.20 (talk) 21:15, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I second the decision to remove the mark for deletion. This person is a notable person for making it to Maxim's top 100. ~ter890~talk 16:56, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Other than the Maxim hot 100 List she has not done anything that is Notable. Yes she is on a show that might have missions of views. That does not make her notable she is one of many youtuber. As many say Sourcefed had millions of views, where is your data to back it up? you have to to have third party data, your option is not enough. Also there was a supposed crash on Maxim because of the votes but again where is your proof? This wiki entry looks like a joke to me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.173.145.133 (talk) 21:55, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where is my proof about the 100 million of views on sourcefed? [1][2][3] Proof of the crash: [4] Exact proof can't be shown since you weren't on the website at the time of the crash. And this wiki entry is supposed to be the joke? Soulboost (talk) 11:59, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Although their is some evidence to provide hints that their was a crash for example, Maxim had to add a captcha security feature which changed the entire voting process.[5] Soulboost (talk) 08:34, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• This article just was "kept" at AFD, yet one editor keeps placing a "notability" tag on the article (and removing content), even though he participated in the AfD and was apparently unable to convince fellow editors of his opinion. I have no personal opinion as to this article, however, I don't believe people who "lose" at AfD should try to delete by subterfuge immediately after an AfD closes.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 15:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

AFD is to decide if an article is deleted, not whether it currently meets policy/guideline x. Resolve the issue of having an in detail 3rd party source, then you can remove it yourself.--Otterathome (talk) 15:50, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• The vast majority of AfD discussions are brought to test the notability of the subject. Indeed, here the AfD nominator's sole rationale in total was "This subject lacks notability." There was no other valid basis for discussion at that point. The consensus outcome was that she was notable. You participated in the discussion. Remove the tag now or you may be perma-banned.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 15:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I see no consensus that the subject meets notability guidelines.--Otterathome (talk) 16:09, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was kept because its notable. WP:NOTABILITY says the article must meet the general notability guidelines or a subject specific guideline. WP:ENTERTAINER is clearly met. I see no reason for that tag, so I'm removing it. Dream Focus 18:46, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do explain.--Otterathome (talk) 17:25, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was explained to you by someone already in the AFD. Maxim proves she Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following. and thus passing WP:ENTERTAINER. Dream Focus 18:11, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Completely fails the basic criteria, but skims by as 'Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following' due to being mentioned after being spammed on a website. None of the sources go beyond a passing mention. Seems like a good example of WP:1E/WP:BLP1E to me. Will go AFD again in due course, assuming the 3rd party sources remain the same.--Otterathome (talk) 18:54, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The YouTube channel has 430,943 subscribers and 114,536,964 video views. [6] So I'm thinking she had a cult following before this. Dream Focus 19:41, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Probably had to do with it being a Phillip Defranco Inc. channel, which has millions of subscribers who will do what he wants — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.154.232.126 (talk) 23:27, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hedBQ2tr414 about 45 seconds in, I already fixed it Wrestlings Savior (talk) 20:07, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From her mouth: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvqpie9Fpw8 at 15:52 in. Though I realize that it's not a creditable source. Drew (talk) 09:26, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lee Newton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120421015437/http://www.maxim.com/hot-100/the-most-popular-hot-100-write-ins-of-2012 to http://www.maxim.com/hot-100/the-most-popular-hot-100-write-ins-of-2012

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:56, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]