Talk:Paramount Global Content Distribution

On 15 March 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Paramount Global Content Licensing to Paramount Global Distribution Group. The result of the discussion was moved.

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Media Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

CBS Television Distribution Group

It seems to me that CBS Corporation has formed the CBS Television Distribution Group and they're about to merge King World, CBS Paramount Domestic Television, and CBS Paramount International Television into one entity. More soon. King Shadeed 13:37, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have a feeling that CBS Paramount International Television--according to the CBS Corporation and CBS Television Distribution websites--still exist, along with its name and logos. That means CBS Television Distribution is the domestic syndication unit of CBS Paramount Television, which also includes CBS Paramount Network Television. Looks like CPITV is still the international distribution unit of CBS Paramount Television. Don-Don (talk) 03:09, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on CBS Studios International. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110724023344/http://newsroom.zonemedia.net/Scripts/FileDownload.asp?fPath=D:%5CWWW_Domains%5CZONE_PRESS%5CFiles%5CPress%5CCBS+FINALChello+Zone+partnership+press+release.doc to http://newsroom.zonemedia.net/Scripts/FileDownload.asp?fPath=D%3A%5CWWW%5FDomains%5CZONE%5FPRESS%5CFiles%5CPress%5CCBS+FINALChello+Zone+partnership+press+release%2Edoc

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:40, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paramount Global Distribution Group

The external link to the official website clearly refers to this division as Paramount Global Distribution Group rather than Paramount Global Content Licensing. But for some reason people keep reverting edits trying to update this? Averyfunkydude23 (talk) 18:41, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

(clerking...moved to bottom of page —C.Fred (talk) 20:32, 15 March 2022 (UTC))[reply]

This in fact appear to be a requested move. At the moment I am making no comment on the merits of such a move. As per WP:BRD, I have restored the status quo version of the page until a consensus can be determined about moving this article to Paramount Global Distribution Group. Singularity42 (talk) 20:42, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked into this more, and I'm going to tag Kp2016rockin. On February 19th, KP2016rockin moved the article from Paramount Global Distribution Group to the current title Paramount Global Content Licensing. The article indicates this is due to rebranding that occurred after February 16, 2022 (but no specific date is provided). No sources for this have been provided, nor can I find that confirmed anywhere through a Google search. I'm inclined to support a move back over a redirect if no sources can be provided to confirm such rebranding occurred. Singularity42 (talk) 20:53, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'm going to start a formal requested move below. Singularity42 (talk) 21:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 March 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) 🐶 EpicPupper ^{(he/him | talk)} 21:35, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paramount Global Content Licensing → Paramount Global Distribution Group – There's no dispute that the parent company changed its name to Paramount Global, but what is this sub-company called. The sub-company's website says it is Paramount Global Distribution Group, and the article was moved accordingly. However, on February 19th, the article was moved again to Paramount Global Content Licensing and an unsourced sentence was added to the article claiming that this was a second rebranding by the parent company. I cannot find any secondary sources confirming that. The only source I can find is the primary source - the sub-company's website - and while the website title as the Content Licensing name, the website itself still says it is the Distribution Group name. Therefore, unless there are other, contrary, more reliable sources, the article should be moved back over redirect. Singularity42 (talk) 21:08, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment In addition to the above, at https://www.paramount.com/brands, Paramount indicates that the brand name is the one with Distribution Group, not Content Licensing. Singularity42 (talk) 21:30, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support, that's what the references seem to indicate and their own branding pages. Canterbury Tail talk 22:02, 15 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support, although my edit summary on this article's page may have been vague (apologies on that), I do support this move, all signs seem to indicate that while the company's website has a URL showing "content licensing", everything within that site indicates the correct name should be "distribution group". In fact, when you go to the site's main page, there is a logo indicating "Paramount Global Distribusion Group" on the top left side, and under their "Global Brands" section, there is only a link for Distribution Group and nothing whatsoever for Content Licensing. - SanAnMan (talk) 18:47, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.