Talk:Postdevelopment theory

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sociology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. International development Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject International development, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of international development, including such areas as appropriate technology, microfinance and social issues, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International developmentWikipedia:WikiProject International developmentTemplate:WikiProject International developmentInternational development articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Economics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

thought this needed to get started here. development theories in general are kind of slimly discussed on the wiki. the text is in no way intended to set the tone and framework of this page. I just wanted to give readers an idea of what postdevelopment is kind of about; hopefully people can organize, edit, and rewrite.--Winjammer (talk) 04:43, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

oh yes. postdevelopment theory is also referred to as 'antidevelopment theory'.--Winjammer (talk) 04:45, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for starting this article Winjammer. It has now been re-edited/re-organised as you have suggested. Hopefully it’s an improvement: if not, just revert or re-edit it again. --User1756 (talk) 13:17, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've incorporated the lists from the Development criticism stub. This seems a better place for them. --User1756 (talk) 15:50, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A section of this article is verbatim plagiarized from a published source - I have indicated where. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.189.179.26 (talk) 23:28, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Postdevelopment theory. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20121231170033/http://www.solutionslocales-lefilm.com:80/en/characters/serge-latouche to http://www.solutionslocales-lefilm.com/en/characters/serge-latouche

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:57, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]