Talk:Queen's Royal Hussars

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: British / European C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  British military history task force European military history task force

See File talk:Churchhill 03.jpg. Opera hat (talk) 21:14, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article describes the QRH as a light cavalry regiment, but that seems to be contradicted by their equipment, and by the listing in Cavalry regiments of the British Army that gives them as an "armoured regiment", rather than "formation reconnaissance". Perhaps some more compound statement is indicated, specifying both their historical antecedents and the present role. 84.203.32.88 (talk) 01:15, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Light cavalry is a historic term for hussars and lancers. Think of the charge of the light brigade. Jim Sweeney (talk) 06:38, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Queen's Royal Hussars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130817215611/http://www.bfbs.com/news/canada-hosts-exercise-prairie-thunder-64259.html to http://www.bfbs.com/news/canada-hosts-exercise-prairie-thunder-64259.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:58, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Someone needs to make the dates more consistent. It says they were founded in 1685 (which is 332 years ago). medals awarded to them referred to as being in the last '320 years', which seems 12 years out of date as I’m sure it is supposed to be there whole history. Then in #privileges and traditions it says: In over 300 years of distinguished service which is OK, but could be more specific.

On return from Afghanistan in 2012 the regiment was called on at very short notice - what is very short notice?

A Guy into Books (talk) 12:41, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All agreed and removed. This regiment actually only dates from 1993. Best wishes. Dormskirk (talk) 13:08, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I must say I had problems finding any historical information to correct it, that explains why I suppose.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Queen's Royal Hussars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080521020040/http://www.qrh.org.uk/ to http://www.qrh.org.uk/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:32, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• QRH cap badge.gif

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:49, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]