Jump to content

Talk:Scott Pruett

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

hi I vote to remove the cleanup tag off the article. The bullets are way a different way of formatting the document (compared to most of what's in here), but I think they are easily understood and effective. I'll let you decide, D-Day, since you added the tag. If you agree, then please remove the tag and take off the project clean-up list. If you disagree, then please explain here what you'd like to see changed (or change it yourself). Thanks Royalbroil 02:37, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good to me. It will be removed today. --D-Day My fan mail. Click to view my evil userboxes 16:01, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article's format seems very messy to me. Casey14 00:32, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The "Career Highlights" section is very difficult to read. It's like trying to read a biography starting with a person's death. Let's add the clean-up tag once again. Fdssdf (talk) 23:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 04:16, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article format

[edit]

Why is the "Career Highlights" section backwards in chronology? Also, as a prose note, the "Career Highlights" section has some sub-sections in it that have fragments that mean almost nothing. These need to be looked at by somebody who knows the man's history so they can properly phrase these sub-sections. But let's start by listing these years chronologically. Fdssdf (talk) 23:32, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I just copy edited what I could with this article, but the "Career Highlights" section remains confusing because of the weak sentences and anti-chronology format. I cannot remove the copy-edit tag. This one section requires a lot of work mostly to clarify just what happened during Pruett's career because, if someone were to read this without knowing who Pruett was, they wouldn't be much more enlightened. Fdssdf (talk) 23:41, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I tried my best to clean-up the career highlights. I think it's much better now. I will therefore remove the clean-up indication.--Kojozone (talk) 19:28, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Scott Pruett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:49, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Scott_Pruett&oldid=1195572347"