Talk:The Gypsy Morph

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels: Fantasy / Shannara Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Fantasy task force (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by Shannara task force (assessed as High-importance).

Somebody edited this article to add some total nonsense - or best wishful thinking/fanfic at worst - messing around. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.115.83.236 (talk) 13:55, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nice catch. I got tripped up editing the language without verifying the accuracy of the claims. Thanks for keeping me from looking like a total idiot. Now if there IS a reliable source for those claims ... ;) --Quartermaster (talk) 16:17, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could someone PLEASE spellcheck that page? Is this Wikipedia for 10 year olds? Terrible grammar all around. - HPDDJ —Preceding unsigned comment added by HPDDJ (talk • contribs) 05:30, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. I made a quick stab, at least correcting "Logon Tom" to the correct "Logan Tom." Consider that since anyone can edit Wikipedia, that maybe a 10 year old DID make the plot summary? In which case "kudos!" to them, but the need for even more cleanup is still obvious. Lots of run-ons and comma splices. I also changed "centre" to "center" not because I'm biased against British spelling, but because a)Brooks writes primarily in American English, and b) the action takes place in what was the continental United States. I can live with either spelling with no problems. --Quartermaster (talk) 13:19, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can haz informative page without plot synopsis regurgitation? A condensed, more general summary would be far better, in my humble opinion. I could also say the same for alot of the Shannara series book articles. Iriscal 03:48, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "new characters" section is pretty useless. It lists mostly characters who dont actaully play a part in the story, being figments of this one guy's imagination- in addition, the 'unnamed girl' and the pair of demons are impressive only for how minor their roles are, appearing on roughly 3 pages of the novel each. The only important character on the list is Wills or whatever he's called, and the synopsis outlines pretty much everything the reader learns about him —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.190.210.188 (talk) 09:28, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]